This is topic Is Israel doing the right thing? in forum Polls Only at Christian Message Boards.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://thechristianbbs.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=27;t=000147

Posted by David (Member # 1) on :
 
Is Israel doing the right thing by going after Hezballah?
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
It's a difficult one this, as I agree with the fact that Israel cannot sit by and have rockets rain down on it, but I certainly don't agree with the way that they have undertaken the action. On balance, I would say no.
 
Posted by WhiteEagle (Member # 3728) on :
 
Israel is doing the right thing. Israelis are practical people and they know that the Muslims' groups whether Hezbollah or Syria, or Iran want Israel destroyed completely.

It's self-defense. Israel will not ***** foot around, as it's a case of their survival.

Israel is doing the only practical thing. It's the right thing.
 
Posted by NLP (Member # 5870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by WhiteEagle:
Israel is doing the right thing. Israelis are practical people and they know that the Muslims' groups whether Hezbollah or Syria, or Iran want Israel destroyed completely.

It's self-defense. Israel will not ***** foot around, as it's a case of their survival.

Israel is doing the only practical thing. It's the right thing.

WhiteEagle: You sound EXACTLY like my dad, I almost thought he got the internet and posted this! LOL. [roll on floor]

I agree with you 100%.
 
Posted by Eduardo Grequi (Member # 3984) on :
 
Is Isreal doing the right thing?

Yes! The Muslims has always had it out with the Isreal. No other country on this earth have MORE enemies than Isreal. The Hezoballahs are just one of twenty facist group that would have Isreal anilated.

This is where I believe that the uniqueness of Isreal stands out. Personally speaking I would rather have the lion lay down with the lamb, but being pratical about it. The lion would rather devour LAMB.

There is no other country that came into existence over night, unless you think about Liberia. Liberia was a country whose main purpose was to allow fomer slaves a place of recognition and acceptance, Isreal if left alone would had been in existence for ten lifetimes and more. The ancient Egyptians would place the Jews back in bondage, Hitler would have every Jew killed, with his allies. Neo Nazis would kill the Jews. For the longest time the Roman Catholic Church would kill the Jews and some still would rather have Isreal killed.

Thank God! Isreal exist. I often wonder how would it be like to have been born in Isreal. Isreal (The Jews) has always remained alive in the hearts of the Jwish people by their culture and somewhat of the culture who circumspect it in various areas where they live today. The language Hebrew never died out because it was always the language of the Jews even in the Synagouges abroad in the world.
Isreal like the bible have been equally scorned and tried to wipe out.

There is a saying that Jewish people not living in Isreal say every year during Yom Kimpur and that is - " MAYBE THIS YEAR JERUSALEM WILL BE MINE"

THY WORD HAVE I HID IN MY HEART THAT I MAY NOT SIN AGAINST THEE.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
I'll qualify and expand my statement a little. I think you have to seperate the principle of defending their citizens from a critical assessment of the acion that Israel is undertaking. The debate regarding the actions of Israel, certainly in the UK, has become very muddied recently - a critism of Israels actions does not imply a lack of support for the country or it's people. Look at the figures for the death toll - the number of Lebanese killed so far is at least 10 times the number of Israelies and at least half of these are civilians.

Israel's military has never given real regard to civilians in it's operations - their counter argument to accusations of civilian caualties has always been "they're killing our people, so we'll fight back, and if a few random innocent people are killed along the way then that's regretable". This is no way for a nation state to behave.

Israel is an institutionally racist state. Fully a fifth of it's citizens are Arabs but they are treated as second class citizens. Do they control a proportionate amount of the countries' wealth, political power, jobs etc ? They do not. You need look no further than the treatment of the setllers in Gaza compared to an Israeli Arab protest march in 1999. The march got a little rowdy and the police weighed in with batons, water cannon, rubber bullets and APCs - there were many injuries and I seem to recall a few deaths. When the Gaza settlers protested in a FAR more violent manner, the police and army went out of their way to ensure none of them were hurt. Gaza settlers throw stones, Police tackle them and take the stones away - Palestinian children throw stones, they get shots fired at them.

I understand Israel is surrounded by hostile states, their memory resounds with times such as the 1967 war and they cannot sit by while Hezbollah rain rockets down upon them while the Arab nations stay silent on the issue. But the nature of the response, not whether there should be a response, is the basis for my objection.
 
Posted by WhiteEagle (Member # 3728) on :
 
ahar:

While in a perfect war it would be wonderful, if innocent people didn't get killed, we do not live in a perfect world.

Why don't you care to mention all the Palestine suicide bombers that have haunted Israel over the past decades. They even train their children it's a way to get into paradise.

Israel is dealing with an irrational enemy.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by WhiteEagle:
ahar:

While in a perfect war it would be wonderful, if innocent people didn't get killed, we do not live in a perfect world.

Why don't you care to mention all the Palestine suicide bombers that have haunted Israel over the past decades. They even train their children it's a way to get into paradise.

Israel is dealing with an irrational enemy.

This is exactly the issue that I mentioned - instead of debating their tactics the answer generally comes back "what about what they have done to use" as if that in some way absolves any debate and gives Israel carte blanche to do as it pleases.

Using the epithet 'they' regarding the indoctrination of suicide bombers presumes that this happens to all Palestinian children and is part of the culture. This tars everyone with the same brush and is the kind of prejudice that can lead down a very dangerous path.

Anyway, back to the point, I don't see the actions of Palestinian suicide bombers (abhorrent though it is) as particularly relevant to the debate on the tactics used to stop Hezbollah launching rockets at Israeli civillians. Israel has a responsibility as a nation state to act in a measured way to achieve it's objectives with the minimum amount of cilivian deaths. Bombing the central TV station in the middle of the day for example, is not consistent with this.
 
Posted by HE LIVES (Member # 4931) on :
 
quote:
Look at the figures for the death toll - the number of Lebanese killed so far is at least 10 times the number of Israelies and at least half of these are civilians.
I feel for the Lebanese people, but that's even more of a reason for the Lebanese government to get rid of Hezoballah. If you allow another country to send rockets to a terrorist group in your country, and let them shoot them at another country, and then blame the other country when they retaliate, that's just crazy!

The Lebanese people shouldn't be blaming Israel, they should be blaming their own government for harboring Hezoballah.

What if the KKK started shooting rockets at Cuba from Florida and we just set back and watched it happen, should Cuba just set there and take it? NO! they shouldn't, but that wouldn't happen here because we would go down to florida and tell them idiots to stop and take their rockets away from them and throw their butts in prison.

The Lebanses government needs to step up and quit turnning a blind eye to what is happening in their country. If you allow this kind of thing to happen in your country then don't act shocked when someone retaliates.
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
My personal opinion is that Israel should not have given back one inch of the land that was taken in the 6 day war in the first place. Isreal was given all this land and so much more for a HOMELAND by Britain who controlled it at the time of the Balfour Declaration. The Arab Palestinians have been offered full citizenship in Israel and they did not want it.. they wanted to be seen as a displaced people.

The Arab Palestinians have vowed that there will be no peace until there is no Israel. But GOD has said that there will always be an Israel! What else can Israel do when these peope have vowed to eliminate Israel?

Because of not wanting to alienate the US, Israel shows much more restraint than I think that they should. No one would expect any other nation to accept the things that Israel has been edxpected to accept. No other nation would be told to give back land legitiamtely taken in a legitimate war. Especially if that land were theirs in the first place!

Israel has two choices - fight or be pushed into the sea. I say that that means they MUST fight. The lines have been drawn and Israel did not draw them. All Israel has ever asked is to remain peaceably in the land that was first given them by God, and later regiven them by Britain.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by helpforhomeschoolers:


Israel has two choices - fight or be pushed into the sea. I say that that means they MUST fight. The lines have been drawn and Israel did not draw them. All Israel has ever asked is to remain peaceably in the land that was first given them by God, and later regiven them by Britain.

Again, we come back to the same point - you can be against the manner in which Israel is undertaking its defence without being against its right to self defence.

As with many endemic problems around the world, British finger prints are all over it - take a look at the mess with India, Pakistan and Kashmir to get an idea of how we Brits have truly screwed things up in the past. About the only place we haven't done much damage is South America, and that's because the Spanish and Portugese got there first - working over eight million locals and imported slaves to death in the silver mines in Potosi in Bolivia was one of their worst crimes.

Anyway, I digress. I will reiterate that the issue I see it is not Israel's right to protect itself, but the manner in which it conducts itself that is wrong. You can't just indiscriminately bomb the hell out of a country and tell the people to blame their own Government.

Of course the Lebanese government is at fault for allowing Hezbollah to continue, but what could they do? For 20 years they were occupied by Israel who smashed their military and as soon as they left Syria moved in and only left 8 months ago - that's a very short amount of time to rebuild your country.

Israel continues to operate with very little regard to Arab civilians - in Lebanon, in Gaza and in the West Bank. You only need look at the (very few) military personnel that have actually been brought to justice for killing civilians - the overwhelming majority of them are Israeli arabs, not Jews.

I am not going to go into the history of the holy land, as it is murky and shrouded in claim and counter claim by all sides - nothing can be achieved in this situation by looking backwards as all sides have historical and religous claims to the land - just look at the Wailing Wall - its just underneath one of the most revered mosques in Islam.

We have to deal with the current situation - there are millions of people living in extreme poverty in the occupied territories and they want the chance for self government. They do not want to become Israeli citizens, and who can blame them given the way that Israeli Arabs are treated by their own country. They also do not want to be citizens of the surrounding countries - apart from the fact that no-one actually wants them, they'll be badly treated there as well (certainly worse than in Israel). These people need a viable state before there can be any semblance of peace. Issues in the middle east keep coming back to Palestinians - without this rallying call, terrorists would find it much harder to recruit people and Israel's security would increase dramatically.

The other situation is the attacks by Hezbollah - while subjecting civilians areas to heavy bombing may be a short term tactical move, it is strategic suicide and just perpetuates the cycle of violence. Israel could claim the moral hgih ground given the constant attacks it is under and no one would deny its right to fight back - but it shoots itself in the foot every time with its own complete disregard for human life.
 
Posted by David (Member # 1) on :
 
.
.
.
.
Israel is doing the right thing.
.
.
.
 
Posted by WhiteEagle (Member # 3728) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ahar:
The other situation is the attacks by Hezbollah - while subjecting civilians areas to heavy bombing may be a short term tactical move, it is strategic suicide and just perpetuates the cycle of violence. Israel could claim the moral hgih ground given the constant attacks it is under and no one would deny its right to fight back - but it shoots itself in the foot every time with its own complete disregard for human life.

I don't think it's Israel that has a complete disregard for human life. I see it's Hezbollah and other Muslim extremists groups that do not seem to respect human life.

How many times does the Muslim world need to state they want Israel completely wiped off the map? They deserve the broad brush getting painted on all Muslims. I rarely hear any so called tolerant and peaceful Muslim folk come forth to really condemn the extremists.

Unless the so called peaceful Muslims start condemming this volence themselves it will not stop. That means Muslims in America as well as the Middle East and elsewhere.

Otherwise they are silently condoning the actions of their extremist brothers and silently saying they agree with them.
 
Posted by WhiteEagle (Member # 3728) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ahar:
quote:
Originally posted by WhiteEagle:
ahar:

While in a perfect war it would be wonderful, if innocent people didn't get killed, we do not live in a perfect world.

Why don't you care to mention all the Palestine suicide bombers that have haunted Israel over the past decades. They even train their children it's a way to get into paradise.

Israel is dealing with an irrational enemy.

This is exactly the issue that I mentioned - instead of debating their tactics the answer generally comes back "what about what they have done to use" as if that in some way absolves any debate and gives Israel carte blanche to do as it pleases.
It's not about "what they have done to us(ie Israel)"

It's about they fact they do these tactics and there is no way of negociating peacefully or reasonably with the Islamic extremist as they appear to be and have stated their single-mindedness and rigid views and seem to prefer death to any kind of peace negociation, that includes Israel as a nation.

Their terms are simple: Israel must be destroyed for Islam to be satisfied.

One can't negociate for any kind of peace with the other party only wanting your death.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by WhiteEagle:
I don't think it's Israel that has a complete disregard for human life. I see it's Hezbollah and other Muslim extremists groups that do not seem to respect human life.

How many times does the Muslim world need to state they want Israel completely wiped off the map? They deserve the broad brush getting painted on all Muslims. I rarely hear any so called tolerant and peaceful Muslim folk come forth to really condemn the extremists.

Unless the so called peaceful Muslims start condemming this volence themselves it will not stop. That means Muslims in America as well as the Middle East and elsewhere.

Otherwise they are silently condoning the actions of their extremist brothers and silently saying they agree with them.

A little incident that neatly illustrates what is going on - this was witnessed by a couple of British Journalists working for Channel 4 News, and reported, with pictures, on the News this evening.

Israeli forces have dropped leaflets telling the civilians to get out of the areas around Tyre. There was a large convoy of civilians to the north leaving Tyre this afternoon when just south of Tyre Hezbollah terrorists launched several missles at Haifa, killing 2 Israeli civilians. Israel quickly pinpointed the launch site and attacked it using aircraft launched air to ground missles. After this, Israeli helicopter gunships also attacked the convoy of civilians moving north (a very great distance from where the rockets were launched from) and destroyed 12 cars, killing 4 civilians - this was a deliverate attack on civilians, when asked the Israeli military just said no comment.

This is unfortunately typical of incidents occurring currently. The view of the British reporters present in Lebanon is that it is carrying out parallel operations - those operations designed to neutralise Hezbollah and their ability to attack Israel, and operations designed to punish Lebanon and it's civilians generally.

These are not my words (sat safely at my PC in London), the are the opinions of independent and impartial British journalists currently working in Israel and Lebanon. This is NOT acceptable and is contrary to Christian values. We cannot sit by without condeming what is happening.

Peaceful muslims ARE condeming the actions of Hezbollah - I'm afraid to say that my experience of the media in the US is that they are not very good at showing a full picture of what is happening. I bet they haven't even covered the attack on the cars travelling north from Tyre.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Andy if you are geeting your perspective from British journalism, then it is hardly fair and balanced towards Israel.

It is not Israel which is hiding weapons in Mosques.

It is not Israel which is firng multitudes of rockets, adjacent to civilian populations, and indiscriminantly into populations of innocent men, women, and children.

You will want to ignore history, because it supports Israel.


http://www.melaniephillips.com/articles/archives/001204.html


This picture of a corrupted BBC culture that is ideologically skewed towards the left is blindingly obvious to anyone who does not share those assumptions. It is a far deeper problem than the political partisanship recently let slip by Today presenter Jim Naughtie when he inadvertently referred to the Labour Party as ‘we’.

With a few honourable exceptions, the BBC views every issue through the prism of left-wing, secular, anti-western thinking. It is the Guardian of the air. It has a knee-jerk antipathy to America, the free market, big business, religion, British institutions, the Conservative party and Israel; it supports the human rights culture, the Palestinians, Irish republicanism, European integration, multiculturalism and a liberal attitude towards drugs and a host of social issues.

Every day, its relentless bias rolls across the airwaves to shape the assumptions of our society. Who can be surprised at Britain’s current anti-Americanism when the BBC starts from the premise that President Bush is a dangerous extremist?

Thus it describes Republicans opposed to his controversial UN nominee John Bolton as ‘moderate’. On News 24 the other night, after scenes of ecstatic Georgians praising President Bush for supporting their quest for freedom, the presenter declared that America was interested in Georgia only in order to grab its oil.

Who can be surprised at Britain’s visceral hatred of Israel when, having all but ignored such atrocities as the two decades of genocide in southern Sudan or the systematic Muslim persecution of Christians worldwide, the BBC obsessively transmits a twisted view of the Arab war against the Jewish state which presents genocidal Hamas terrorists as heroic freedom fighters and Israeli attempts at self-defence as unwarranted aggression?

On issue after issue, the BBC throws impartiality to the winds. When abortion recently resurfaced as a controversy, TV’s Newsnight featured a discussion between two pro-abortion campaigners — Sir David Steel, the architect of the current Abortion Act, and the feminist writer Suzie Orbach — with no-one to put an anti-abortion view.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:
Andy if you are geeting your perspective from British journalism, then it is hardly fair and balanced towards Israel.

It is not Israel which is hiding weapons in Mosques.

It is not Israel which is firng multitudes of rockets, adjacent to civilian populations, and indiscriminantly into populations of innocent men, women, and children.

You will want to ignore history, because it supports Israel.


http://www.melaniephillips.com/articles/archives/001204.html



Melanie Philips, quite frankly, is known as the most rabid pro-israel journalist there is. Israel could start boling babies for fun and she'd still never utter a word of critism. She hates the Guardian newspaper (mentioned in the clip from her article you cut n paste) and would disagree with them on any issue just out of pure spite. She also hates the institution of the BBC and would just a well see them closed downfor a whole host of reasons, not just their news reporting. Having seen her many times on discussion programmes, I would say that she is the least impartial journalist you could find.

I take my news from the wide variety of journalistic sources, including the Daily Mail (a very pro Israel paper) in which she writes. The BBC is always accused of bias, usually by all sides of any debate. Their view is that if both sides are accusing them of bias, they're usually somewhere in the middle. So it is with reporting on Israel - the board of british jewish deputies (kinda like the top jewish organisation in the country) is always accusing the BBC of bias. But then so is the Muslim council of Great Britain and other Muslim organisations. Not sure if you can get it in the US, but at least watch the BBC News for a while and make up your own mind. At least read the BBC News website http://news.bbc.co.uk/

To be honest, I don't want to go into the history because it won't get us anywhere - there seem to be two versions - one very pro israel and one very pro arab and I've not found anything in between. As is the way of these things, I doubt either of them are entirely true.

Not being a history professor I don't have the skills or resources to go back to the primary material and undertake the years worth of comprehensive research to make my own mind up. I suspect the vast majority of people are in this position, so we have to content ourselves with history books written by other people, inevitably with a certain view point. We tend to choose sources of information that chime with our views anyway, so the whole exercise becomes pointless - any debate turns into a case of repeating the arguments read from books written by other people.

And yet again we come back to the central point I make. The fact that Hezbollah are firing rockets in to Israel and killing civilians does NOT give it carte blanche to do anything that it wants. It has the right to defend itself and undertake the actions necessary to stop hezbollah, but that does not give it the right to undertake a lot of the things it is doing at the moment. Just this morning, several more civilians were killed and injured in indescriminate shelling of a town - the reason? Hezbollah have 'some kind' of presence there. Was there an effort to find out what this presence was? No. Was there an effort to hit the one or two buildings that would achieve their aim? No. One evil act (firing rockets into Israel) does not excuse another.

The British Government is pretty pro-israel, and is one of the few countries in the UN on the same side as the US and Israel in this. However, after a visit for the last few days to both Israel and Lebanon, even our Foreign Secretary Kim Howls (our equivalent of Condi Rice) has said that Israel is going too far at the moment.

Even Melanie Philips admits very many British Jews don't think that Israel is right in it's response

http://www.melaniephillips.com/articles-new/

"Yet Britain’s Jews still remain muted. This is much more than the usual craven cultural cringe that is the default position of the Jewish leadership in this country. It is because, even among that swathe of the community that does not harbour the hatred of Israel displayed in the Times advert, many are wringing their own hands over Israel’s ‘disproportionate’ response."
 
Posted by WhiteEagle (Member # 3728) on :
 
ahar:

Actually I feel that Israel is using a great deal of restraint.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by WhiteEagle:
ahar:

Actually I feel that Israel is using a great deal of restraint.

I certainly think that there are people with the Government and the military that want to go further, and are being held back.
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
The British Government is pretty Pro Israel?? Forgive me but that is such a joke. The British government's pro Israeli policies at this point are tied to nothing today except their alliance with the US, and it is too little too late!

It was The British government created the situation that is today because they did not stand by their own mandate! The British government melted under Arab pressure and began dividing what they first gave for a Jewish Homeland in the first place! The British Government point blank stated that it would not be good for the Middle East to become as Jewish as Europe had become! The British Government allowed ships full of Jews to die at sea rather than allow them to come back to Israel.

You want to make Lebanon the innocent in this? Lebanon was occupied by Israel for 20 years you say? I say hogwash.. After the 6 day war Lebanon allowed its land to be used for the reorganization of militants and the likes of Vassar Arafat and the PLO who had lost their place in Jordan's civil war and took up residence in Lebanon, and from this place of residence continued to wage war on Israel. Israel is surrounded by enemy on all sides and there is the sea... if Israel is being attacked from the north then Israel will defend its borders on the North and that defense will include preemptive strikes when necessary. There is no country in the world that would sit outside the border and continually defend attacks without seeking to cross the boarder and eliminate the source of attack! It was the Palestinian onslaught of refugees and militants like Arafat and the PLO that caused civil war in Lebanon as it had done in Jordan, but let us also not forget that there needn't have been a Palestinian refugee situation in the first place. The Israeli's had offered citizenship to the Palestinians and the Palestinians did not want it... they were instead made pawns by their neighbors who sought to make them refugees... beckoning them in Jordan and Syria... not to give them a home, but to refugee camps where they would become something to cause the world to pity... the Palestinian people were exploited for the gain of a few who wanted power and control of all Palestine and whose hate for Israel would not allow them to share the land, but would cause them to call for the complete annihilation of the Jews and the Jewish state. Lebanon was not without a choice! Lebanon allowed itself to be launch pad for the PLO and Lebanon allowed itself to enter agreements with Egypt and Syria that would result in creating an micro state within Lebanon that was the under the control of Arafat. Israel did not create the Palestinian problem that would lead to a 16 year long civil war in Lebanon! Britain created it by first mandating the Homeland of Ertz Israel and then bending to Arab pressure to continually divide the land into increasingly smaller and smaller portions until they created an Israeli state that was strategically undependable.

When Israel attacked the Beirut airport it was not un provoked, it was because the PLO had been hijacking planes and Lebanon had made a home for the PLO.

Let us remember that it was Lebanon that called for Syrian intervention in their civil war in the first place; Whether the US and France say the presence of Syria in Lebanon is co-opted and that Lebanon is nothing more than a puppet to Syria is immaterial. Syria did not occupy Lebanon, they were invited into Lebanon to strengthen their military presence because of the stress on Lebanon's military from within and from without!
There presence there was sanctioned by their own parliament. So I just can’t buy oh poor Lebanon!

Further, when Israel invaded Lebanon in the early 80's it was not unprovoked... the PLO had tried to assassinate the Israeli Ambassador, which was a final straw in a series of attacks made against Israel by the PLO who was based in Lebanon! Israel occupied a buffer zone which was needed because of the PLO and because of Syria. When Israel pulled out of that buffer zone, Syria took their place.

The UN resolutions that called for the withdrawal of Israel and Syria from Lebanon also called for the destruction of Hezbollah, but this has not happened and as long as Lebanon chooses to be a home for the many Israeli hating militias of the Middle East they will have to deal with the possibility of invasion from Israel. The same is true of Jordan or of Syria or of Egypt.. If there is attack against Israel from those countries then they can expect Israel to retaliate, and even to preemptively invade!
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by helpforhomeschoolers:
The British Government is pretty Pro Israel?? Forgive me but that is such a joke. The British government's pro Israeli policies at this point are tied to nothing today except their alliance with the US, and it is too little too late!


As I said before in an earlier post, a large part of this mess is due to the historical incompetence of Britain around the middle east. The middle east is just one of many areas around the world where this is the case - the past actions of Britain are very often shameful (as are many other countries).

It's probably true that a part of the support for Israel from the Brtish Government comes from our alliance with the US, but to call the fact that the government is pro israel a joke is to demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the past actions of this Labour government. Time and again the current labour administration has supported the actions of Israel and been given a large amount of political flak for this - the left wing (and pretty anti Israel) of the labour party is exasperated with the current leadership over this and they are continually complaining about it. The previous Conservative government also had a large number of very pro israel ministers.

It still comes back to the distinction between Israel's right to defend itself and the actions it undertakes to do this. Just yesterday, two ambulances, in the process of transferring patients, were blown up by airstrikes. The first one was hit by one missle, and two minutes later the other one was hit. It was at night and they both had illuminated their lights and their red cross symbols.

Do I think that Israel has a policy of attacking civilians and ambulances specifically? No of course not, but it does display a criminal lack of care time and time again. I suspect the pilots saw the vehicles, and under the rules of engagement that they have been given, fired before making any attempt to identify the vehicles.

It is not enough to acknowledge that Hezbollah are hiding in civilian areas and then carry on regardless with reckless abandon, blaming any causualties on them. Israel has an obligation to undertake actions that reduce to an absolute minimum the number of civilian causualties - Israel is not, and very frequently does not, do this. Not just in Lebanon, but across the west bank and Gaza.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=108293


Rice was slated to meet with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Tuesday, hours after an initial meeting with Foreign Secretary Tzippy LIvni on Monday evening in which she expressed U.S. concerns for Lebanese civilians affected by the war.

“We are concerned about the humanitarian situation,” she said, “and nobody wants to see innocent civilians harmed.” Israel opened a humanitarian corridor in its seaside blockade two days ago in order to allow foreign nationals to leave Lebanon and international aid into the country. Most countries evacuated thousands of their citizens from Lebanon last week.

Olmert said Tuesday morning before meeting with Rice that Israel would try to work with the U.S. to relieve “humanitarian difficulties”, but reiterated that Israel will carry out “the most severe measures” against Hizbullah terrorists firing rocket attacks at Israel.

According to a political source, Olmert is expected to present Israel’s conditions for a ceasefire in his meeting with the U.S. Secretary of State. He is also expected to express Israel’s support for the temporary installation of an international force comprised of NATO soldiers in south Lebanon.

Rice is also expected to meet with Defense Minister Amir Peretz and then travel to Ramallah to meet with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, chairman of the minority Fatah faction.

Livni told Rice that a ceasefire would only be considered after the return of the two IDF soldiers it kidnapped on July 12, dismantling the Hizbullah terror organization and deployment of the Lebanese army in the south of the country. Hizbullah has controlled the region since Israel pulled out six years ago, in direct violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559.

The resolution, passed in 2004, calls for the disbanding and disarming of all domestic and foreign militias, and for the government of Lebanon to exercise control over all Lebanese territory.

“We have learned that peace must be based on long-term and stable principles, an end to the violence and a resolution of the humanitarian problems,” Rice responded, adding that Resolution 1559 had already spelled out the solution.

U.S. President George W. Bush has said he will not support any deal that leaves Hizbullah terrorists on Israel’s border.


)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=108269

A U.N. official charged Hizbullah terrorists of acting "cowardly" by exploiting civilians. His accusation helps balance criticism that Israel has caused a humanitarian crisis in Lebanon.



European countries and foreign media, from the outset of Israel's retaliation to the Hizbullah terrorist war against Israel, have charged that the Jewish state has caused a humanitarian crisis in Lebanon.

However, Jan Egeland, head of the United Nationals humanitarian efforts, accused Hizbullah of "cowardly blending" among women and children." He said he heard that the terrorists were pleased that civilians suffered more than their own terrorists. "I don't think anyone should be proud of having many more children and women dead than armed men," he added.

Egeland did not spare criticism of Israel, which he said has killed innocent civilians in its attacks on Hizbullah strongholds. Visiting American Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni Monday night that it is important to prevent a humanitarian crisis in Lebanon. Israel already has opened up a corridor to help medical supplies and food enter the country."

Secretary Rice is scheduled to speak with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian Authority (PA) chairman Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday.

The charges by the United Nations official that Hizbullah is violating the civil rights of Lebanese are an important turn in the war of public opinion and come only one day after a British Broadcasting Corp. (BBC) reporter told listeners that he saw Hizbullah terrorists exploiting civilians.

Israel has launched an unprecedented campaign to explain to foreign media and to Jews in the Diaspora that Hizbullah executed acts of war against Israeli citizens that require a sovereign nation to defend itself.

Prime Minister Olmert told a visiting Jewish delegation Monday, "I don't recall such an event in which it was absolutely clear to [so many people] who were united in supporting the State of Israel and accepting the Israeli reaction as inevitable and totally natural...The attacks both in the south and the north were an outright violation of the basic fundamental right of the State of Israel...and it was an act of war.

"A nation that respects itself cannot afford to accept these...[terrorist] threats....
We will fight Hizbullah and we will not stop unless we will able to guarantee the security and safety of the State of Israel even if I have to fight a year or two years.

"We are going to kill them one by one.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5212158.stm

'No outright criticism'

Following her surprise visit to Beirut on Monday, in which she held talks with Lebanon's Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, she has been stressing the importance that innocent civilians should not be harmed.


Israel is acting with tremendous restraint, were they targeting civilian populations there would be thousands upon thousands dead
Steve Gross, US


However, our correspondent says there is no suggestion that she will tell Mr Olmert that Israel must halt its military operations, or that she will make any public criticism of Israel's actions.

The BBC's World Affairs Editor John Simpson in Jerusalem says it is understood that Ms Rice is telling Israel that the US will allow it more time to continue its military operations against Hezbollah militants in southern Lebanon.

Some 380 Lebanese and up to 40 Israelis have died in 14 days of conflict, which began after Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border raid on 12 July.

'Hezbollah cowardice'

The UN's aid chief Jan Egeland has accused Israel of using excessive force, but on Monday he accused of Hezbollah of contributing to the problem by what he called "cowardly blending in among women and children".

"I heard there was a statement they were proud they had lost very few fighters, and that it was the civilians bearing the brunt of this. I don't think you want to be proud of having many more children and women than armed men [killed]," Mr Egeland said, speaking in Beirut.


Israeli troops push into Lebanon as their offensive continues

In pictures

The UN has launched a $150m (£81m) aid appeal for Lebanon and the US has announced its own $30m package to ease the suffering of civilians.

Mr Egeland said the money was needed to help feed and shelter about 800,000 civilians caught up in the conflict.

About $24m was on behalf on Unicef for children who have been displaced inside Lebanon or who have fled to Syria.

Mr Egeland said he was asking the Israelis for safe passage for aid ships to enter the ports of Tripoli and Tyre.

A White House spokesperson said the US was also working with Israeli and Lebanese officials to open up humanitarian corridors in Lebanon, after President George W Bush promised ships and helicopters to provide aid to Lebanon.

The EU has already pledged $12.6m in aid while on Monday the UK increased its pledge to £5m.

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
There is an engrained prejudice against Israel, within the British press. This subtle prejudice is what has shaped Andy's social liberal bias, and his filtration of the news.

Just an example of their bias towards Israel's enemies:

BBC:

Some 380 Lebanese and up to 40 Israelis have died in 14 days of conflict, which began after Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border raid on 12 July.


This legitimizes the terrorists, through the use of the words captured and raid, as if they were a legitimate military organization on a legitimate military operation.

From the Israel news:

Livni told Rice that a ceasefire would only be considered after the return of the two IDF soldiers it kidnapped on July 12,

Terrorists kidnap, legitimate military organizations capture.

The use of the terms is very subtle, but over the course of years the citizens of Great Briton have been indoctrinated in social liberalism through media bias.

The BBC has reported the thousands of rockets which have ben firedinto Israel. However their primary focus is not on Israel's casulties from terrrorist attacks, but on the Lebanese casulties from Israel's response.

Ingrained media prejudice against Israel.

It is no wonder that Andy does not want to hear about history. He might have to face a reality other than presented in the British press. He might have to face the legitimacy of Israel's response to blatant terror closing-in whenever they withdraw from territory. He might come to realize that the Palestinian refugee is merely a tool by the Arab enemies to maintain preassure on Israel. He might come to understand that there are many Israeli Arabs among their peaceful population, especially in Tel Aviv, who have also been murdered by suicide bombers, and are under threat from the rockets raining down on the innocent.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tel_Aviv

Tel Aviv-Yafo (Hebrew: תֵּל אָבִיב-יָפוֹ; Arabic: تَلْ أَبِيبْ-يَافَا‎ Tal Abib-Yafa) is an Israeli city on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea. Tel Aviv is also the main part of the largest and most populous metropolitan area in Israel, known as Gush Dan (Dan Bloc).

Tel Aviv-Yafo's jurisdiction is 50,553 dunams (50.6 km² or 19.5 mi²). The population density is 7,445 people per km² According to the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), as of May 2006, the city's population stood at 379,000, growing at an annual rate of one percent. 96.1% percent of residents are Jewish, while 3.0% are Arab Muslims and 0.9% are Arab Christians. According to some estimates, about 50,000 unregistered foreign workers live in Tel Aviv. According to a 2001 estimate, the metropolitan area of Tel Aviv is the city with the largest Jewish population in the world, with 2.5 million Jews (New York City's metropolitan area, in second place with 1.4 million Jews according to a 2002 study, is the largest Jewish population center in the Diaspora) [1] [2]
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
Drew Thanks for those posts! Andy, you said:

quote:
It's probably true that a part of the support for Israel from the Brtish Government comes from our alliance with the US, but to call the fact that the government is pro israel a joke is to demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the past actions of this Labour government. Time and again the current labour administration has supported the actions of Israel and been given a large amount of political flak for this - the left wing (and pretty anti Israel) of the labour party is exasperated with the current leadership over this and they are continually complaining about it. The previous Conservative government also had a large number of very pro israel ministers.
You are correct, I do not know the internal struggles of the Labor party in Britain over the issue of Israel or the struggles between left and right conservativism and Liberalism in Britain.. I suspect that they are much the same as the struggles between left and right here in America.

Still I feel that the British government is the root cause of much of this that the world must deal with in regard to the situation in the middle east today and what ever they are doing today is still too little too late and I believe that it is as Drew has said that there is a subtle media bias and prejudice at work here as we view this current situation.

Also know, that I do not either hold my own country without fault. Our own needs and agenda's also are a huge factor in our policy toward Israel. Our dependance on foreign oil and our need for strategic positioning in the Gulf have caused our own government to pressure Israel into treaties and cease fires and disengagements that they never should have been forced into in the first place and I have no doubt that this nation will have to answer to GOD Almighty for it!

You say that this is not about Israel's right to defend its borders but about how she goes about defending them, but I see that her restraint is and has been more than any other nation would have exerted given the same circumstance.

What would be enough restraint for you? The truth is that Israel and the West and most of the civilized world plays by very different rules than these that Israel is fighting with.

This fight that Israel is engaged in... and I mean the fight that she has been engaged in since the day of her statehood is a fight where her opponents have no rules of engagement... it is anything goes... attack a new nation that has no military from all sides on the day of its birth? You want to talk about Lebanon's worn down military.. let's talk about attacking Israel on the day of her statehood! You want her pilots to identify ambulances from the air and not bomb civilian targets when the civilians have allowed a government to embrace terrorists that hide among women and children and in civillian areas and fire against Israel. Israel is engaged in a war with people who train children to carry bombs and automatic weapons and to use them. Israel is engaged in war with a people where women carry grenades, and bombs and automatic weapons under their burkas and think it righteous to attack civiliian buildings and shopping areas and public transportation in the middle of the day where there are nothing but civillian causualties! Israel is at war with a people that have vowed that they will never stop fighting until she ceases to exisit and a people who think it nothing to make treaties and agreements that suit their own agendas at the time and then break them when the time is to their advantage.

How old are you Andy? Have you lived through and seen the war of attrition that Israel has lived through? You cannot fight guerrilla warfare by the same rules that you fight other kinds of wars.


quote:
Israel has a responsibility as a nation state to act in a measured way to achieve it's objectives with the minimum amount of cilivian deaths.
Israel's objectives are to live peacfully in a land that is hers and that would require no amount of civillian deaths if the nations around her would acknowledge her right to do so... instead they have vowed that she cannot exisit and that is their objective and they have shown and continue to show that there is absolutely no limit to what they will do to acheive this objective even to the threat of using nuclear weapons and dirty bombs, even to the point of brainwashing, and sacrificing their own women and children.

You cannot ask Israel to act in a measured way when she is surrounded by an enemy that does not use the same measure. To do so is to ask her to commit suicide.

This is not about borders and refugees and occupied territories. This is about the removal of a nation and a people from the face of the earth and that is the objective of Israel's enmey.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
I wonder if the BBC will carry this story:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=108334

15 Year Old Girl Killed as Katyusha Strikes Pick Up
17:02 Jul 25, '06 / 29 Tammuz 5766
by Nissan Ratzlav-Katz

A 15-year-old girl in the Druze town of Meghar was killed Tuesday afternoon, when Hizbullah stepped up its rocket attacks on northern Israel.


The teenager was killed when the Katyusha struck her family's apartment in a direct hit. Her 30-year-old brother was seriously wounded and her 12-year-old sister suffered light injuries. 20 other people in the town were treated for shock and light injuries. Police are checking reports that a mosque was also damaged in the attack.

One person was injured lightly in a barrage of at least seven rockets on the area of Kiryat Shemona in the Upper Galilee. Missiles fired at Tzfat in the afternoon landed in open fields, although two missiles landed in the city earlier in the day, sending one man into shock. Ten Katyushas struck Ma'alot, south of Tzfat, wounding 11 people. Three people were injured in attacks on Carmiel. Tiberias and Acre also were hit with a number of rockets, but no injuries were reported. In addition, a Katyusha fell near the Israeli Arab city of Shfaram for the first time on Tuesday.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
One should note that the girl killed was from a Druze village. These are Israeli Arabs living peacefully in Israel, and even serving in the IDF:

Druze in Israel

The Druze community in Israel is officially recognized as a separate religious entity with its own courts (with jurisdiction in matters of personal status - marriage, divorce, maintenance and adoption) and spiritual leadership. Their culture is Arab and their language Arabic but they opted against mainstream Arab nationalism in 1948 and have since served (first as volunteers, later within the draft system) in the Israel Defense Forces and the Border Police.

Worldwide there are probably about one million Druze living mainly in Syria and Lebanon, with 104,000 in Israel, including about 18,000 in the Golan (which came under Israeli rule in 1967) and several thousands who emigrated to Europe and North and South America.

The Druze community in Israel has a special standing among the country's minority groups, and members of the community have attained high-level positions in the political, public and military spheres.


Or this story:
http://directory.kol-israel.com/asites/?

Soldiers, Assulin said, took several guerrillas captive during the fighting. He said that there were still pockets of resistance on the outskirts of the village, and most of the Hizbullah guerrillas left inside, just under 100, were hiding in the Kasbah marketplace.

The IDF was still encountering Hizbullah gunmen who were shooting form inside mosques, hospitals, and schools. They take advantage of the population, Assulin said, "But the IDF has high moral values and does its best to avoid harming anyone uninvolved."

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The IDF was still encountering Hizbullah gunmen who were shooting form inside mosques, hospitals, and schools.


Nope nothing about Israeli victims on the BBC:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:
I wonder if the BBC will carry this story:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=108334

15 Year Old Girl Killed as Katyusha Strikes Pick Up
17:02 Jul 25, '06 / 29 Tammuz 5766
by Nissan Ratzlav-Katz

A 15-year-old girl in the Druze town of Meghar was killed Tuesday afternoon, when Hizbullah stepped up its rocket attacks on northern Israel.



First place I looked:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5214046.stm

It;s getting late here and I have an early meeting at a client site tomorrow so I'll just cover one thing. Helpforhomeschoolers asked me how old I am - I'm 28 (my birthday was Sunday - spent the afternoon in Regent's park with a Picnic with my wife, very nice). My Dad was in communications in the RAF and deeply involved in several counter insurgency and counter terrorism operations, notably in Cyprus. His experience, and the experience Briatain has had all over the world is that you can, and must, fight guerrilla warefare with MORE rules than conventional warefare. The key to beating your opponent is removing the local support that they have (something the British have failed to do time and time again, in Cyprus, in Northern Island etc) - this is not something that can be achieved through indescriminate bombing and shelling.

Never fear, I'll be back to continue the debate - I'm finding it very informative!
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5214046.stm

In the latest military action:

* Israeli warplanes have reportedly hit a UN observation post in south Lebanon. A UN spokesman quoted by Reuters news agency said a bomb hit the post in the Khiam area, but he would not confirm reports from Lebanese security sources that four peacekeepers were killed



* The Israeli army said it had killed a senior Hezbollah commander, Abu Jaafar, in fighting in southern Lebanon

* Earlier the UN had said Israeli forces were now in control of the town of Bint Jbeil after fierce fighting and were moving on the village of Yaroun to the south

* Israel resumed air raids on Beirut, with explosions heard in southern suburbs - a Hezbollah stronghold

* Hezbollah maintained fire of Katyusha rockets into Israel, killing a 15-year-old Arab-Israeli girl in the northern Israeli village of Maghar and striking Haifa with a large salvo

* Hezbollah said 27 of its fighters had been killed as of Monday, but the Israeli military said it had killed "some dozens".

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Minimal mention of the fifteen-year-old girl submerged in the middle of the article and then down the page a slideshow with 9 pictures and individual comments:

"People in Tyre describe life under Israeli bombings".

Fair and balanced would have had equal time for Israelis to also describe life under terrorist attack. The overwhelming emphasis is to picture Israeli aggression and to legitimize Hezbollah terrorism.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Will the British Bias Corporation run this news article?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Lebanese Expatriates Support Israel

Lebanese Expatriates Condemn Syria, Iran; and Praise Israel
00:26 Jul 26, '06 / 1 Av 5766
by Nissan Ratzlav-Katz

Many Lebanese expatriate groups have roundly condemned the Hizbullah, Iran and Syria. Some of them are also calling for Israel to press ahead in its military campaign.


The Lebanese Canadian Coordinating Council (LCCC), a coalition of organizations in Canada, has released a statement laying out its vision of what measures should be endorsed by the world community at an international conference on the ongoing warfare in Lebanon. The conference is to be held in Rome on Wednesday, pursuant to a recommendation issued by the United Nations Security Council on July 21, 2006.

Among the measures the LCCC is recommending are the dispatch of international combat forces to Lebanon, armed with the full authority and sufficient firepower to implement all clauses of UN resolution 1559. This would include the to mission to "disarm the Hizbullah group and the Palestinian organizations, and prevent and intercept the transfer of weapons to them from Iran and Syria."

Another agenda item the LCCC called for is "a resolution by the United Nations condemning Syria and Iran, holding them responsible for the escalation leading to the catastrophe that has befallen Lebanon, and making them liable for the damages incurred by the Lebanese people and the costs of reconstruction...." LCCC also seeks to establish an international commission of inquiry "mandated with the task of determining Hizbullah's legal responsibility for the events leading to the cycle of violence inflicted on Lebanon today...."

The LCCC also warned all Lebanese against "the deceitful calls aiming at surrendering to the will of the fundamentalist Hizbullah group and the dictates of its financiers and sponsors in Damascus and Tehran.... To remain silent over their crimes or to turn a blind eye to their practices, violations and threats is itself an act of treason to the nation and an unforgivable crime."

In addition to the LCCC, the press release was endorsed by eleven Lebanese groups from the USA, Europe and Lebanon itself. The LCCC represents the Canadian Lebanese Human Rights Federation, the Canadian Lebanese Free Patriotic Movement (FPM-Canada), the Phoenician Club of Mississauga (PCOM), the Canadian Phoenician Community Services Club (CPCSC), the Canadian Lebanese Christian Heritage Club (CLCHC), the World Lebanese Cultural Union-Canadian Chapter.

The Lebanese Foundation for Peace (LFP), an international organization of Lebanese Christians, issued a press release last week that called upon Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert "to hit them hard and destroy their terror infrastructure. It is not [only] Israel who is fed up with this situation, but the majority of the silent Lebanese in Lebanon who are fed up with Hizbullah and are powerless to do anything out of fear of terror retaliation." The LFP also said that "thousands of volunteers in the Diaspora" are "willing to bear arms and liberate their homeland from [Islamic] fundamentalism," with the logistical support of Israel.

In an interview with Israel National Radio's Tovia Singer, former South Lebanese Army officer, and leader of the Guardians of the Cedars militia, Etienne Sakr ("Abu Arz") called on Israel to press ahead until victory in its offensive against the Hizbullah. He said that, while Lebanon can be rebuilt, Israel must not allow the Islamist elements in the country to survive the war. To do so, he said, would repeat the mistake of the 2000 IDF withdrawal from Southern Lebanon. At the time, speaking before the Knesset, Sakr charged that Israel had "made heroes out of Hizbullah."

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Support for Israel:

Support For Israel

In London, several thousand people turned out at a solidarity rally on Sunday. Israeli Ambassador Zvi Haifetz and British Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks were among those on the list of speakers. The event followed a large anti-Israel protest held earlier in the day.

In Rome, both right-wing and left-wing Italian politicians joined hundreds of people in a public display of support for the Jewish State. The rally was held outside Rome's main synagogue, in the former Jewish ghetto, on Monday. Among those addressing the crowd were outgoing Israeli ambassador to Italy Ehud Gol, Rome’s mayor Walter Veltroni, leader of the Left-Democrats Piero Fassino, and leader of the rightist National Alliance party, former Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini.

In North America, the Jewish communities of New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Washington DC, Toronto, Baltimore and St. Louis, among others, have had, or will soon hold, rallies in solidarity with Israel in its war against Arab terrorism.

Among the largest of the rallies held in the US was the Sunday gathering in Los Angeles, which drew about 10,000 people. Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center opened the event and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger also addressed the crowd.

"While we all regret the loss of innocent life, there is no doubt that Israel has the right to take all appropriate steps to keep its people safe," Gov. Schwarzenegger said.

American soldiers stationed in Iraq have also sent messages of support and encouragement to the IDF via a new web site established to express solidarity with Israel. "Take care of the Hizbullah; we will take care of Iran," wrote one US soldier. Another wrote, "From Iraq, we wish good tidings for you brave IDF soldiers. The American army is 100 percent for Israel."

More than 400 messages from outside Israel have been sent to IDF soldiers via the new site thus far. British citizen John Wilkes, who established the forum, says that he did so primarily out of concern for a friend of his in the IDF.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5214046.stm

In the latest military action:


You'll always be able to find articles that only mention certain things rather than go into detail as the news is dynamic - as one article is published, another is taken down. A simple snapshot proves very little. As someone who lives in Britain and actually watches the BBC news, I think that it provides balanced coverage - the BBC dis cover the pro-israel rally in London - how do I know? It was held 10 mintues round the corner from my flat (an area called Kenton) and I saw it on the news. Anyway, as I said before I take my news from a wide variety of sources - the BBC website is generally a good place to link to as it is recognised internationally and the BBC are a darn site better than any US news channel I've ever watched.

Anyway, back to the discussion. Helpforhomeschoolers, I agree with much of what you said - Israel is surrounded by it's enemies and is struggling to survive. Britain has a lot to answer for historically, not least with Israel but also in Iraq (if you can, read the story of how we artifically created the country to facilitate an easy exit for our troops).

The 'western' countries do play by a different set of rules than Hezbollah - but that is what makes them a terrorist organisation. The set of rules has a moral purpose and as nation states (rather than terrorist organisations) we must adhere to these lest we become like those we fight against.

In your paragraph, it almost sounds as if you support the bombing of civilians as punishment for the actions of Hezbollah: "You want her pilots to identify ambulances from the air and not bomb civilian targets when the civilians have allowed a government to embrace terrorists that hide among women and children and in civillian areas and fire against Israel". Do the actions of Hezbollah sentence all of the people of Lebanon to death? How do we tell who really likes Hezbollah and who doesn't - maybe we can ask them to put their hands up before the shells land on them? Remember, Hezbollah, as well as their murderous activities, also undertake widespread social programes (old people's homes etc), and fund schools and hospitals where there are none. The daily life of a ordinary lebanese is a complex moral maze - if your son is diabetic and needs treatment, do you take them to a hospital that may be part funded by Hezbollah or not?

Hezbollah have been thrust on the Lebanese people by Iran and Syria, by a Government partly not willing and certainly not able to get rid of them, and by the necessities of daily life where no such support services currently exist. Are the people of Lebanon blameless? No. But they do not deserve the punishment currently being meted out.

You asked what I'd like to see? Well, I think that the establishment of a barrier such that Israel are currently undertaking is not ideal but the best course of action at the moment until international peacekeepers can move in. I certainly don't support the extent of the bombing and shelling that has been undertaken, and the truly reckless way Israel has done it. Just yesterday a UN outpost was hit by a precision guided missle (http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1153291996858&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull).
Do I think that it was targets BECAUSE it was a UN post? No. But I don't believe that it was a stray either - under the current rules of engagement I suspect someone saw some activity and fired without any attempt to see who or what they were firing at - nothing less than criminal negligence.

Caretaker - I'm not sure where to start with your comment about my subtle bias. Do I start with the premise you gave that because I live in the UK and watch the BBC that my views are somehow automatically biased and that I'm not able to use my intelligence to make a reasoned judgement, or with your own subtle biased use of the phrase 'social liberal'? I won't take this any further as I suspect no good will come of it.

I will respond to one paragraph though:
"He might have to face a reality other than presented in the British press. He might have to face the legitimacy of Israel's response to blatant terror closing-in whenever they withdraw from territory. He might come to realize that the Palestinian refugee is merely a tool by the Arab enemies to maintain preassure on Israel. He might come to understand that there are many Israeli Arabs among their peaceful population, especially in Tel Aviv, who have also been murdered by suicide bombers, and are under threat from the rockets raining down on the innocent."


You said that I don't want to face up to the legitimacy of Israels response - well, time and again I have said that it is not the issue of response, but how they go about it. Of course the Palestinians are used as a tool by Arab governments, but this does not make their present situation any less of a tradgedy or lessen their need for a viable state. I also think in my previous posts I mentioned the Israeli arabs, but also mentioned the unequal treatment and prejudice they receive from their country.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
I was reviewing my post in the context of the other replies and I get the feeling I'm the only one here with this view (well, maybe cafferty as well).

I was interested - by critising Israel in the way that I do, does anyone feel I am not living up to my biblical duties to support Israel and Jewish people? If so, at what point do you draw the line between support for the state of Israel, and support for sinful activities in regards to the current conflict?
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
quote:
In your paragraph, it almost sounds as if you support the bombing of civilians as punishment for the actions of Hezbollah: "You want her pilots to identify ambulances from the air and not bomb civilian targets when the civilians have allowed a government to embrace terrorists that hide among women and children and in civillian areas and fire against Israel". Do the actions of Hezbollah sentence all of the people of Lebanon to death?
Hi Anyday: No I am not in support of bombing suvillians as punishment for the actions of Hezbellah.


I also do not believe that the bombing Israel is doing is for punishment, but for getting rid of their attackers, who happen to be hiding and attacking from civillian areas.

I understand that the innocent people will be bombed if they live in an area where a group like Hezbollah is hiding because it is too costly to the other side to forever remain sitting ducks at the mercy of an enemy that does not play by the same rules.

I so not believe that you can remove the local support that these groups in the middle east have. Even enemies will unite over a common enemy the same way a hostage will come to sympathize with the kidnapper. Israel is the enemy. Isreal is the enemy because they are Jews period. We do not understand this.

The nations that surround Israel do not believe that Israel has the right to EXIST. They do not believe that JEWS have the right to EXIST. The believe that it is their Duty to GOD to cause Israel to cease to exisit.

Even the people that hate Hezbollah find common enemy with them in Israel. Sunni and Sheite find common ground on the subject of Israel. This is not about borders and no amount of social good that Israel could ever do would make them to not be the enemy here. So a plan to take away the support of the common man for the terrorist cannot work. We should make no mistake about it.. this issue today with Lebanon is just one battle in a war of many battles. Lots of inocent life has been and will continue to be lost... but this is a war that is a war unto the death... The Bible tells us ultimately whose death... and whether we like it or not.. think that it fair or not... have hearts that bleed for the innocent or not... it is not Israel's death that we will eventually see.

We talk about war as if there were a human and moral way to have war. There is no human and moral way to have war. Innocent people die in war whether the war is beteen nations that think themselves civilized and their rules of engagement moral.. or whether between tribes where there are no hold barred and it is every man for himself. War is just not moral or humane period... none the less war and desloations are determined until the end..

This is not a war about boundries or land.. this is Jihad. It would behove us all to come to understand this.

Da 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined..

 -
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
 -
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by helpforhomeschoolers:
[QUOTE]

We talk about war as if there were a human and moral way to have war. There is no human and moral way to have war. Innocent people die in war whether the war is beteen nations that think themselves civilized and their rules of engagement moral.. or whether between tribes where there are no hold barred and it is every man for himself. War is just not moral or humane period... none the less war and desloations are determined until the end..

This is not a war about boundries or land.. this is Jihad. It would behove us all to come to understand this.


If this was the case, then if you believed that your cause was just it would empower you to do ANYTHING during war and feel justified for it. War is hell, but there are ways to minimise this.

An example from today. Yesterday evening, the Israeli military broadcast over loudhailers in several villages in south lebanon that the inhabitants should leave as quickly as possible as there are Hezbollah in the area and the military wanted to get them. The inhabitants pulled together a few posessions in a bag a hotfooted it out of there to Tyre to the north. Some of them took shelter in the basement of a block of flats. So far so good - Israel attacking the militants and trying to get the civilians out of the way first.
However, this morning Israel learned of the fact that a senior Hezbollah commander had an appartment in Tyre - not that he was currently there, or that something was happening there, just that he had an appartment. Israel's response? Flatten the entire appartment block 'just in case'. Any attempt to check whether the info was true? Any attempt to get civilians living in the appartment block out? Any real military objective? It's currently unknown how many people died though first reports are that many people were hiding in the basement. Yet again, criminally negligent actions.

EDIT: An example of the support the UK is currently giving to Israel - note the paragraph:
"Britain has been used as a staging post for major shipments of bunker-busting bombs from America to Israel. The Israelis want the 5,000lb smart bombs to attack the bunkers being used by Hezbollah leaders in Lebanon. The Government's agreement to the bomb flights was criticised last night by the Liberal Democrats."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2287228,00.html
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
quote:

I was interested - by critising Israel in the way that I do, does anyone feel I am not living up to my biblical duties to support Israel and Jewish people? If so, at what point do you draw the line between support for the state of Israel, and support for sinful activities in regards to the current conflict?

Personally, I am not sure that any of us has Biblical Duties to support Israel. I believe that how we view and react to Israel has a great deal to do with who and what Israel is to us.

For me. Israel is The Lord's, both the land and the people. They are inheritance of Christ's; Right now they are lost sinners. As individuals we must as Christians witness to them Christ. But as a nation, we must understand that they were blinded for our sakes and they are enemy when we speak as touching the Gospel, but they are beloved of God.

I understand that Jesus did not curse the nation of Israel, but the authority of Talmudic Judaism.

I understand that one day GOD is going to return a remnant of Israel to the Torah and to the Land and there they are going to come as a nation to know that Christ is the Messiah. I know that one day Christ will return to this earth to claim that remnant that is HIS promised to HIM by the Father and to claim the Land that is also HIS promised to HIm by the Father as the seed of Abraham; I understand that HE is coming to claim the literal Earthly Throne of David and that when the fullness of the Gentiles is come in, the Stick of Joseph that is now in the hands of Ephraim will be joined with the stick of Judah and they will become one nation in the hand of GOD and One Kind JESUS will reign over them and they will live in ONE land that is Palestine and for 1000 years they will teach the nations the oracles of God and be a witness that the GOD of Jacob is the HOLY ONE of ISRAEL... not ISLAM and not Mohammad, BUT ISRAEL.

Because I am the body of Christ, for me to curse Israel is to curse my own inheritance...my own brethren, the branches fo the very tree that I am grafted into, knowing that GOD Himself is going to one day bring them to faith and to TRUTH and graft them back in.... The nation of Israel not the state, but the nation of Israel and the church are branches of the same BRANCH which is part of the same Tree, which is part of the same root and if the root is HOLY then so the Branches. How can I speak against the branch... I cannot.

Still there is a difference between the state of Israel and the nation of Israel, and today the state of Israel does a lot of things that I do not like or agree with, but I know that GOD will deal with the sins of the State of Israel, in the mean time, I want to see Israel the nation in the land of Palestine, and I want to see them build a temple and I want to see them return to the Torah, because in doing this, the nation of Israel that is likely at this very moment a remnant inside the state of Israel will find Christ and so I am against all things that seek to eliminate Israel as a people or a Land.

Having said all of that and apart from my personal love for Israel that is out of a love for the KING of Israel, and their Brethren and mine as Abraham is the Father of us all, I have to say to you that I would feel that any state that were in the situation that Israel is in ... that situation being one in which its neigbor states have vowed their complete and utter anihilation, I would find them justified in defending their existance with what ever means they determined necessary.

The land that Israel is been given was given first to them by GOD, then it was lost to them as GOD allowed them to be spoiled by their enemy. That land eventually came into the control of Britian who legitimately won it in battle and Britain then gave it back to Israel for a homeland. Since it is also GOD that sets Kings on their Thrones and allows one kingdom to fall into the hands of another as he goes about the day to day year to year judgement of nations, then it was again GOD who gave the land of Palestine to Israel for a Homeland, and on the very day of their Statehood they were attacked.. and the rest is history, much of it helped along, by Britian's failure to keep her own mandates and her own prejudices against the Jews and her crumbling against the pressure of Arab nations... so eventually the land given to Israel was whittled away until she was undefenseable and then when surrounded on all sides by enemy who had vowed her anihilation and were preparing for attack on all sides, she preemptively struck out and in a 6 day war that would have been impossible except for the fact that God gave her enemies over unto her hands she took back what had been taken from her and a war of attrition began. No nation should have to be subject to neighbors who will not rest until she ceases to exist and be expected not to do what ever it is that she must to ensure her continued existance. Israel is not trying to colonize the Arab world she simply seeks to live in the land that is hers at peace.

So, you ask... "at what point do you draw the line between support for the state of Israel, and support for sinful activities in regards to the current conflict?"

We all have to draw that line at a place where we can look at ourselves in the mirror and also answer to God.

For me, that place is this...I get angry when I see some of the stuff that the state of Israel is doing and has done. When this happens, I pray... I pray that God would have mercy on her and I pray that HIS Kingdom come and HIS will be done on earth as in heaven, and I pray for the Palestinian people that their eyes be opened and they come to know that Christ is the Messiah and God would heal them of the hate that they have for Israel... I realize that there is nothing that is happening to them in this life that is worse than what is going to happen to them after this life because they have rejected the SON of the HOLY ONE of Israel and I know that if they would come to Christ, there would be no hate in them for Israel... the whole middle east problem would cease to exist if the Moslem people and the Jews would come to Christ!

I do not criticize Israel and I do not judge Israel because GOD will deal with Israel.. God is dealing with Israel even now.. for the very reason that they are allowed to be trodden upon is their sin against HIM... but I cannot fail to see that there are two things going on here... One Israel is being punished by God for her sin against HIM, but also the sin of the Gentile Nations is being allowed to become exceedingly sinful... there sin is beiong allowed to come to completion and when that happens judgement is coming to the heathen and repentence, reconcilliation and restoration is coming to the Jews... because GOD has chosen them from the beginning.

Too often we react to and deal with the events of this life from an earthly view... we judge what is right and what is wrong from a limited lineier perspective of time and space and we who are Christ's are supposed to have the mind of Christ and know the will of God and GOD sees the end from the beginning. I cant judge Israel before her time because GOD has a plan and that plan includes the restoration of a remnant that is Israel in the flesh and is going to one day take their place among ALL Israel of which we are part.
 
Posted by David (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ahar:
I was interested - by critising Israel in the way that I do, does anyone feel I am not living up to my biblical duties to support Israel and Jewish people?

:::::::::::::::

I will bless those who bless you,
And I will curse him who curses you;
And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”

Genesis 12:3 (NKJV)

That pretty much answers it.

If you don't want God's favor, then I would say talking bad about His people will do it.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David:
quote:
Originally posted by ahar:
I was interested - by critising Israel in the way that I do, does anyone feel I am not living up to my biblical duties to support Israel and Jewish people?

:::::::::::::::

I will bless those who bless you,
And I will curse him who curses you;
And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”

Genesis 12:3 (NKJV)

That pretty much answers it.

If you don't want God's favor, then I would say talking bad about His people will do it.

Ah, but then the question moves to where you draw the line - I'm sure that if, for example, they legalised homosexual marriage you would have a few choice things to say.
 
Posted by David (Member # 1) on :
 
But they have not, so you are worrying about something that has not happened.

You could say that God may say He really is not God. But that don't make it true.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David:
But they have not, so you are worrying about something that has not happened.

You could say that God may say He really is not God. But that don't make it true.

I used that as an example of a line that you might draw in critism of Israel. Either Israel is immune to critism or it is not - if not then the decision is where you draw the line and how you balance critism of what might be called sinful actions, with risking 'cursing' Israel as described in Genesis.

My feeling is that Israel has crossed that line and deserves to be rebuked for some of its actions - clearly everyone else posting in the tread doesn't!
 
Posted by Eduardo Grequi (Member # 3984) on :
 
This war is no different than Abraham when he heard the news that his own kin was captured. Got an army together from among his servants and went in and slew their enemy and retrieved Lot and the others. The reason why is more heavy and and confused, conflicted WE USE GUNS, TANKS, BOMBS just like the Islamic Fascists.

ISREAL IS PROTECTING THEIR OWN, NO MORE DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY ON EARTH.

Satan on the other hand seeks to whom he may devour. WELL I BELIEVE FASCISTS ISLAMICS ARE LED BY SATAN HIMSELF. They seek to destroy, to devour, to maim, and to control !!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eduardo Grequi:
This war is no different than Abraham when he heard the news that his own kin was captured. Got an army together from among his servants and went in and slew their enemy and retrieved Lot and the others. The reason why is more heavy and and confused, conflicted WE USE GUNS, TANKS, BOMBS just like the Islamic Fascists.

ISREAL IS PROTECTING THEIR OWN, NO MORE DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY ON EARTH.

Satan on the other hand seeks to whom he may devour. WELL I BELIEVE FASCISTS ISLAMICS ARE LED BY SATAN HIMSELF. They seek to destroy, to devour, to maim, and to control !!!!!!!!!!!!

Abraham didn't kill civilians.
 
Posted by Miguel (Member # 47) on :
 
Andy in every war there is going to be innocents kills; I don’t think they are just among at them. If that is the case and then my Father in heaven have no heart when sending Moses to kill male, female, infants and animals.
 
Posted by Eduardo Grequi (Member # 3984) on :
 
Andy have you read the entire old testament! When the Isrealites came into the Jericho they were commanded to kill everyone- not one soul left except The harlot who lived in the wall with the read chord was spared. The Battle of Jericho.

I gaureentee you, if it was to be hand to hand combat- and no one used guns, tanks, and missles there would be less civilian causalties.

Have you ever been in the company of neo nazis or arian people who train their childrens to kill from the get go. ANd I tell you this fascist Islamics are no different. They train their children it is okay to kill any one who is different from what you believe.
 
Posted by Itty-Bitty Girl (Member # 4579) on :
 
Yo! Do you know what I hate? I hate when people and the media criticize Israel and try to make it look they are villians. People get sucked into that trash the media puts out and start believing it.

Why is it that the wrong that the other nations do to Israel is being costantly overlooked. This ish is making me mad.

And some civilians are going to die, and their blood is not on the hands of Israel. It is on the hands of Hezebolah for his actions that led to the conflict in the first place. I'm sick of people demonizing Israel.

Israel is surrounded by enemies, and it breaks my heart.
 
Posted by SoftTouch (Member # 2316) on :
 
Wow, this is a long thread... I read a lot, but not the majority... here's where I stand:

Israel is doing the only thing she can do... defending herself and trying to make certain that a repeat can not happen. Israel does not hide behind civilians as the Terrorists do. Israel does not hide her weapons in the houses of innocent people as the Terrorists do. How could Israel possibly avoid civilian casualities??? It's impossible in Any war... much less when the enemy uses the civilians as human shields. What is Israel supposed to do? War is Hell...

Israel Is Doing The Right Thing and I'm Behind Her 100%
 
Posted by Gramajo320 (Member # 4667) on :
 
Ahar,

I have a special love for all Jewish people and for Israel and always will have. Israel is doing the right thing in defending their country and the citizens of their country. Remember it was the Hezbollah who killed some Israeli soldiers and then took two with them. Hezbollah and Hamas need to be totally disarmed.

I've never understood the bias against the Jewish people and Israel and I believe all of the bias is so wrong. I see and hear bias from news reporters and that's also wrong to be so biased in reporting the news.

Almost a year ago I became a member of the Jerusalem Prayer Team and I receive e-mails from them. Mike Evans gives us news reports of what is really going on in Israel. Today the Hezbollah has now threatened to use chemical and biological weapons against Israel and I have not doubt that Hezbollah will indeed try to do just that - Members of Hezbollah and Hamas, and all other terrorists groups have no regard for any human life - they want a jihad. They believe any terrorist act they commit is okay and they believe if they die in committing a terrorist act that they will go to paradise. I once explained to a person who claimed to be a Jihadist just where he would in actuality be going and that it wouldn't be paradise or heaven. They hate american citizens just as much as they hate Israelis and it's their wish to kill all Jewish people and all American people.

In any war innocent civilian lives are lost and that's terribly sad and also heartbreaking but it's a fact of war.

Israel is completely justified in their battle to protect their citizens and their country and I'm in complete agreement with them and I'm behind them 1000 percent. Furthermore, Ahar, Israel will prevail!
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
I'm giving up on this thread. Time and time again I have tried to bring the discussion around to what is actually happening, and all everyone (except for a few) seems to do is equate ANY critism of what Israel is doing with some kind of anti Israel, anti semitic bias and then go on about suicide bombers etc. I KNOW that Israel is under attack and bad things happen to it but this does NOT give them carte blanche to do whatever they want.

Over 400 Lebanese have died so far - some of these are Hezbollah, but at least one third are children. Israel has demonstrated criminally negligence in its actions time and again and not to critise them is a sin.

I'm accused of anti-Israel sentiments - look at yourselves and question whether your own bias towards Israel is stopping you from critically examining what they are doing. Remember, by their own admission, ALL US networks censor a huge part of the footage they have of events in Iraq and the Middle East so as 'not to upset their viewers'. I wonder how different your opinions may be if the real images of causualties on both sides were on yur TVs every day.

PS Generally, most daytime news broadcasts in the UK do censor footage, but not to the same extent. Late night, and one off programmes generally do not censor footage.
 
Posted by Gramajo320 (Member # 4667) on :
 
Ahar,

Israeli planes dropped leaflets for civilians of Lebanon to read asking them to evacuate to safer territory and gave them some time to do so. Some civilians paid attention to the leaflets and did evacuate. Others did not pay attention and chose to take the risk by staying there. At least they were forewarned. Members of Hezbollah and members of Hamas mix in with the civilian population and they carry out their cowardly evil acts. You say look at the images of those who've been killed in Lebanon by Israel. I say to you look at all the images of Israeli children, women, and men, who lost their lives when the evil suicide bombers carry out their evil deeds in buses, stores, restaurants, etc. Look at the images of over 218 U.S. Marines and some U.S, Navy personnel who were killed as they slept when their barracks were bombed by Hezbollah in Beruit.
Look at the images of all of the innocent people killed in New York on September 11, 2000 by the evil terrorists. Look at the images of the people killed in London when the evil bombers blew up places, look at all the images of all bombings carried out by the terrorists all around this world. Look at the images of the evil terrorists holding hostages and beheading them on camera. Look at the images of the terrorists killing their very own people in cold blood every day. Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Quaida members want a holy war and they've been calling for a holy war for a very long time as I'm sure you are aware of that fact!

After the utterly horrific holocaust of the 1930's and 1940's when 6 million Jews, men, women, and children were murdered during Hitler's regime, the Jewish people later said "Never Again!"

Israel has every right to do what they are doing to stop Hezbollah, Hamas, and other terrorists organizations and I will always be in agreement with them.

Take a look at our own country and the horrific evil deeds of the terrorists in New York on Sept. 11, 2000. Our country went to war in Afghanistan and then went to war in Iraq to first liberate all the people of the two countries and then to fight the terrorists. The terrorists organizations have no respect and no regard for any human life - they can kill you without blinking an eye and they certainly have no remorse over all of the beheadings they've committed.

Anyway I stand by all the Jewish people and Israel! They will prevail! They are within their rights!
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:
Ahar,

Israeli planes dropped leaflets for civilians of Lebanon to read asking them to evacuate to safer territory and gave them some time to do so. Some civilians paid attention to the leaflets and did evacuate. Others did not pay attention and chose to take the risk by staying there. At least they were forewarned.

They only started dropping leaflets 10 days into the bombing. Also, it's not always possible for people get out in the time scales that they gave AFTER large parts of the infrastruture (raods, bridges etc) have been destroyed. It's not like the US - a lot of people don't have cars, there are few buses, no air transport and no trains. Would you risk walking along while Israel is dropping bombs around you? The UN are STILL helping to pull people out from the south - people who want to and have wanted to leave from beginning but cannot due to the destroyed infrastructure and continued bombardment.

quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:

Members of Hezbollah and members of Hamas mix in with the civilian population and they carry out their cowardly evil acts.

Oh, so that means that Israel can happily bomb away not bothering about civilians as it's all Hezbollah's fault?

quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:

You say look at the images of those who've been killed in Lebanon by Israel. I say to you look at all the images of Israeli children, women, and men, who lost their lives when the evil suicide bombers carry out their evil deeds in buses, stores, restaurants, etc. Look at the images of over 218 U.S. Marines and some U.S, Navy personnel who were killed as they slept when their barracks were bombed by Hezbollah in Beruit.
Look at the images of all of the innocent people killed in New York on September 11, 2000 by the evil terrorists. Look at the images of the people killed in London when the evil bombers blew up places, look at all the images of all bombings carried out by the terrorists all around this world. Look at the images of the evil terrorists holding hostages and beheading them on camera. Look at the images of the terrorists killing their very own people in cold blood every day. Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Quaida members want a holy war and they've been calling for a holy war for a very long time as I'm sure you are aware of that fact!

No, if you bothered to read my post I said to look at the images of victims on both sides. And I see you've gone back to wittering on about suicide bombers. Unlike most of you sitting safely in you cosy seats in the US, I walk past the place where the bus blew up in London on my way to work every day. My wife uses the No 30 bus route - but by the grace of God it could have easliy been one of us. Don't bother waxing lyrical to me about the dangers of Islamic terorism.

quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:

After the utterly horrific holocaust of the 1930's and 1940's when 6 million Jews, men, women, and children were murdered during Hitler's regime, the Jewish people later said "Never Again!"

Israel has every right to do what they are doing to stop Hezbollah, Hamas, and other terrorists organizations and I will always be in agreement with them.

Take a look at our own country and the horrific evil deeds of the terrorists in New York on Sept. 11, 2000. Our country went to war in Afghanistan and then went to war in Iraq to first liberate all the people of the two countries and then to fight the terrorists. The terrorists organizations have no respect and no regard for any human life - they can kill you without blinking an eye and they certainly have no remorse over all of the beheadings they've committed.

The holocost does not give Israel the right to ignore its responsibilities in keeping civilian causualties to a minimum. Israel is a nation state, Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation. They are different - Israel, as a nation state MUST abide by a different set of rules. If they do the same as the terrorists, how are they any different?

quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:

Anyway I stand by all the Jewish people and Israel! They will prevail! They are within their rights!

You stand by them no matter what they do? Are they exempt from sin? Do they have the right to do anything that they want?
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eduardo Grequi:
Andy have you read the entire old testament!

I have read the old testament (even the really gruesome bits in Judges). You mentioned Abraham, so I responed regarding Abraham.

The old testament was the old testament - we are living under the new covenant and God told the to kill them all as there were all unbelievers. Just try going out now and doing the same as they did in the Old Testament (the phrase we use nowadays is genocide) and see what God thinks.
 
Posted by David (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ahar:
You stand by them no matter what they do? Are they exempt from sin? Do they have the right to do anything that they want?

They have the right to defend themselves from the bloodthirsty terrorist who continue to kill their people.

First of all, Israel is responding not just to those recent killings but to a long string of attacks since it withdrew from Lebanon in 2000. The kidnapping was just the straw that broke the camel's back.


Good Quotes:

First, Israel is striking a population that has embraced terrorism. Aside from the fact that the Israelis consistently strike in exurban areas and warn civilian populations before each attack, the truth is that the populations of the Gaza Strip and Lebanon were not forced to elect Hezbollah and Hamas. Hezbollah is the largest political party in Lebanon, Hamas is the largest political party in the Palestinian territories; those kidnappers are the ones who garner the most votes from that civilian population. Even the Arab nations understand the character of Hamas — they recently sent $100 million in aid to the Palestinians, but did it through Palestinian President Abbas rather than trust Hamas with the money — but that civilian population voted them in anyway. People who vote for terrorism cannot demand immunity.

http://www.mcall.com/news/opinion/anotherview/all-torczyner7-14jul14,0,1818138.story

::::::::::::::::::::

In Israel you can not tell the terrorist from the civilian because they all dress the same. So, if you see what you assume is an innocent civilian that has been killed by an Israeli missile, think twice. If you buy into the Hezbollah propaganda, then you are part of the problem.

::::::::::::::::::

Israel is not at fault for the death of civilians. While Lebanon allows a terrorist regime to operate within its' state and represent a large majority of its' government, it is responsible for the death of these "innocent" civilians. These so called "innocent" civilians you speak of also harbor members of this terrorist regime, as well as store munitions in their homes.

:::::::::::

The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has been deployed since 1978, not long after Israel first entered Lebanon in pursuit of PLO terrorists. UNIFIL was created pursuant to Security Council Resolution 425, for the purpose of "confirming the withdrawal of Israeli forces, restoring international peace and security and assisting the Government of Lebanon in ensuring the return of its effective authority in the area." Quite obviously UNFIL has utterly failed to achieve the Security Council's objectives, either before or after Israel's 2000 complete withdrawal from Lebanon. One reason is that UNIFIL does not interdict Hezbollah attacks on Israel. Instead, UNIFIL allows Hezbollah to set up positions next to UNFIL units, in effect using UNIFIL as human shields against Israeli counterstrikes. (Aluf Benn, Israel accuses UN of collaborating with Hezbollah," Haaretz, Sept. 11, 2005.)
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
quote:
Israel is a nation state, Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation. They are different - Israel, as a nation state MUST abide by a different set of rules. If they do the same as the terrorists, how are they any different?
They are different because they are fighting for a land that is theirs given by GOD.

They are different because they are reacting to people trying to take their land.. not going out trying to conquer other's land.

They are different because ultimately when all is said and done, Christ himself is going to come and claim that land for the children of Abrahams and if you have not read there are going to be so many dead that Israel is going to employ full time people to bury the bodies for 7 months, and for 7 years they will burn the spoils and the weapons and the things left there in battle.

They are different because ultimately in the end when all is said and done, it is they that GOD plans to bring to repentence of sin and restoration and reconcilliation with HIM as a NATION, and it is the others that will be judged as a Nation for their having troddened upon Israel!

It does not matter whether we think this is fair or right or what ever..... it is ultimately what GOD is going to do!

 -
 
Posted by TEXASGRANDMA (Member # 847) on :
 
Gen 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

There were times, that Israel did not obey God's commands and kill everyone that God them to. They always lived to regret disobeying God. The truth is we may feel sorry for these children in Lebanon and should but they are born and raised on hate for the Jews. The are the enemy of the Jews.
betty
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by helpforhomeschoolers:
quote:
Israel is a nation state, Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation. They are different - Israel, as a nation state MUST abide by a different set of rules. If they do the same as the terrorists, how are they any different?
They are different because they are fighting for a land that is theirs given by GOD.

They are different because they are reacting to people trying to take their land.. not going out trying to conquer other's land.


 -

Ah, so you don't need to differentiate between civilians and others if the land was given to you by God. That somehow makes you immune to sin?
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David:
[QUOTE]

Israel is not at fault for the death of civilians. While Lebanon allows a terrorist regime to operate within its' state and represent a large majority of its' government, it is responsible for the death of these "innocent" civilians. These so called "innocent" civilians you speak of also harbor members of this terrorist regime, as well as store munitions in their homes.


First of all, Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation, not a regime. It does not represent a large majority of the government - they have a few government ministers, not a majority. They do resemble a quasi-governmental organisation in the south of Lebanon as the majority of their activity is not terrorism but providing health, education and social care activities. This does not justify any terrorist acts they undertake, but it does show the complexity of the situation that most people in this thread so far have conveniently ignored.

Israel IS responsible for some of the civilian casualties. Let me give you yet another example - Israel is using cluster munitions in built up areas. These are pretty nasty weapons, originally designed for the cold war where they could be dropped on large enemy troop concentrations to cause maximum injury within the troop mass. These weapons consist of a large container that houses hundreds of 'sub-munitions' or bomblets. The container is dropped (or fired by artilery) over an area and it bursts scattering the sub-munitions over a large area. Ignore what you will be shown on TV, with precise missle strikes on a specific building - these weapons are indescriminate. They also not all explode on impact - they hang around waiting to be disturbed when they explode. They are brightly coloured, and look a lot like childrens toys - many children in Iraq have been killed or maimed picking up these objects.

Cluster munitions do have a place in war - when you have a concentration of enemy troops they are very effective at killing them - they were used with some success in Vietnam for example. In a counter-insurgency operation like this, where you are fighting guerrila rather than conventional forces, not only is their use partly limited, but they kill a vastly dispropotionate number of civilians and make any life returning to the area very expensive and difficult due to the clean up.

People keep mentioning that Israel have told the civilians to get out - let me say again, not only did they only start telling them to leave 10 days after the bombing started but it is incredibly difficult to leave when the ports are blockaded, bridges destroyed, airport crippled and even Israel admits that it is not safe traveling on the roads. How are they meant to get out - use a Star Trek teleporter?
 
Posted by Gramajo320 (Member # 4667) on :
 
Ahar, Israel helped to make certain that all who wanted to leave could do so. Did you not see the news of the lebonese people leaving, also all the other people of other countries leaving, our U.S. Marines were also there helping americans and others to leave taking them out to the waiting ships! Israel is not the bad guy in this conflict! Hezbollah and Hamas is and although you won't admit to it, you know that's the truth!
Israel has the right to defend themselves and their country! Any country has the right to defend themselves against those terrible terrorist organizations. Israel is right!
 
Posted by Itty-Bitty Girl (Member # 4579) on :
 
Aw, come on, ahar, Israel is trying to defend herself by any means neccessary. They gotta do what they gotta do, yo.

And I can see where you are coming from. You have a good heart for people, and I like that about you, but don't let your emotions blind you from the fact that it is up to Hezebolah to end it all.

Hezebolah can stop all this.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:
Ahar, Israel helped to make certain that all who wanted to leave could do so. Did you not see the news of the lebonese people leaving, also all the other people of other countries leaving, our U.S. Marines were also there helping americans and others to leave taking them out to the waiting ships!




Rubbish - the UN are STILL helping people get out, despite the bombing. If there aren't any civilians left in the south, why are the Red Cross and UN aid people risking their lives driving aid convoys down into the south where the fighting is happening.

Rose - I ask you to look beyond what you might see on the Fox news network and search out reports from all news sources (British, US, Israeli, Arabic etc) as to what's happening on the ground. Dig deep into the weapons being used, the targets and tactics, and decide for yourself from this evidence whether it is going to far or not. Stop thinking in terms of black and white (Israel is right to defend itself or not) and look at the complexities of the situation and the choices available to all sides - only then can you make an informed decision. This is not about absolutes - to support or not support Israel - this is about the complexities of the situation and the response that the situation justifies.
 
Posted by Itty-Bitty Girl (Member # 4579) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ahar:

Rose - I ask you to look beyond what you might see on the Fox news network and search out reports from all news sources (British, US, Israeli, Arabic etc) as to what's happening on the ground. Dig deep into the weapons being used, the targets and tactics, and decide for yourself from this evidence whether it is going to far or not. Stop thinking in terms of black and white (Israel is right to defend itself or not) and look at the complexities of the situation and the choices available to all sides - only then can you make an informed decision. This is not about absolutes - to support or not support Israel - this is about the complexities of the situation and the response that the situation justifies.

Iiight then, ahar, you seem like a decent man, and what you ask sounds reasonable, so I'll take another look at this from all angles... And we'll see just what I find.

Yo! Maybe you have a point, maybe you don't.

I'll review this more...

I'll let God guide me to the truth, like He always does. I want to see it for myself, so I can breathe easy.


... *And yo! How you know I was watching the Fox News Network? HA!
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
quote:
Ah, so you don't need to differentiate between civilians and others if the land was given to you by God. That somehow makes you immune to sin?
Oh, Andy, I expected so much more in the form of a rebuttle from you than this. This is lame and it surely is not my words. I have said absolutely nothing about Israel being immune from sin.

I am not even sure what it means to be "immune"from sin. Is it like being immun from a disease? That would mean Israel cannot sin? Surely Israel can and does sin.

Israel is justified in defending their land. Hezbollah has attacked their land from Lebanon. Lebanon... not Israel...Lebanon has an obligation to protect her citizens. Lebanon has not done this. Not only has she not done this, but she has allowed Hezollah from within to place her citizens in jepoardy.

How will God judge these nations? I believe that GOD will judge Lebanon for allowing her citizens to be indangered by Hezbollah. I believe that God will judge Lebanon for ensuring the safety of her citizens.

I believe that GOD will not judge Israel for defending her land. In fact, I believe that the fact that many of her soldiers are reported to be in prayer for their nation while they are on the battlefield, God just might be on her side and minimize her loses and advance her success.

Seeing that I see that this is how GOD will judge these nations, I am unable to judge in a way that I believe GOD will not himself judge.

Could I be wrong? Yep! But I trust that God will have mercy on my soul if I am knowing that it was because of HIS word regarding Israel that I have seen this as I do.

The just shall live by fatih, Andy.
 
Posted by Gramajo320 (Member # 4667) on :
 
Ahar, what I said to you in my last posting is the truth and it was reported on the national news and they showed several pictures. I did not say that all people were out! After all there were many thousands of people lined up waiting to be evacuated and taken out to the waiting ships to be taken to Cyprus. Furthermore everyone knows it takes a whole lot of time to complete a very large mass evacuation!

If at some point in time you were told you had to make a choice between Israel or Hezbollah and Hamas, which would be your choice?

I shall forever stand by all Israelis and Israel!
They are in the right no matter what you think!

Hezbollah and Hamas are evil terrorists who've committed terrorist barbaric acts all around the world and yet you choose to ignore what they have done and all that they continue to do. You talk about Israel's weaponry. Take a good look at Hezbollah and Hamas weaponry! Take a good look at everything they do! Israel and the Israelis are not the bad guys in the conflict - Hezbollah and Hamas are and you know they began the problem when they kidnapped the two soldiers and refused to return them when Israel requested that they do so. This occurred before Israel ever began attacking and Israel gave them time before they ever went on the offensive - a true fact that you cannot deny! Israel is very definitely within their rights!

One thing is for certain - God is in control, He will forever be in control and I give God all praise, love, glory, and thanks for everything throughout each day 24/7!
 
Posted by TEXASGRANDMA (Member # 847) on :
 
I read that the terrorist won't let the people leave Lebanon. The sad truth is, if a Country protects a terrorist group then they are just as bad as the terroirist group.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
Helpforhomeschoolers - Sorry, my response was a bit glib - the point I wanted to make is that where God gave them the land in the Old Testament does not absolve them from any of the duties that befall any other person or nation when using their military

quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:
Ahar, what I said to you in my last posting is the truth and it was reported on the national news and they showed several pictures. I did not say that all people were out! After all there were many thousands of people lined up waiting to be evacuated and taken out to the waiting ships to be taken to Cyprus. Furthermore everyone knows it takes a whole lot of time to complete a very large mass evacuation!

The phrase that you used was "Israel helped to make certain that all who wanted to leave could do so". This is only true of foreigners, not Lebanese civilians.

quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:

If at some point in time you were told you had to make a choice between Israel or Hezbollah and Hamas, which would be your choice?

I shall forever stand by all Israelis and Israel!
They are in the right no matter what you think!

This is not a black and white, Israel or Hezbollah decision and to put it in that context is wrong. Israel is right to defend itself, but that does not negate the possibility of critism of their actions in doing so. Critising the way that Israel goes about defending itself does not imply support for Hezbollah.

If it was black and white as you suggest, you are then saying that Israel can do ANYTHING in defence of it's nation no matter whether the threat is large or small, up to and including turning Lebanon and half the middle east into a smoking ruin using it's nuclaer weapons NO MATTER what the threat.

quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:

You talk about Israel's weaponry. Take a good look at Hezbollah and Hamas weaponry! Take a good look at everything they do!

Hezbollah and Hamas are terrorist organisations - of course they have nasty weaponry - that's because they are terrorists! Israel is a nation state, and has a responsibility as a nation state to minimise the suffering of innocent civilians, otherwise they act in the same way as the terrorists.

quote:
Originally posted by Gramajo320:

I give God all praise, love, glory, and thanks for everything throughout each day 24/7!

On that at least, we agree, but then I suppose that's not surprising as it's a Christian forum [Smile]
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
quote:
If it was black and white as you suggest, you are then saying that Israel can do ANYTHING in defence of it's nation no matter whether the threat is large or small, up to and including turning Lebanon and half the middle east into a smoking ruin using it's nuclaer weapons NO MATTER what the threat.
Is this not exactly what the other side does threaten now? I think that Iran has made it very clear that they do not think that Irael has the right to exisit in the land of Palestine even if it means poluting the land with nuclear waste that will render it unihabitable.

I think that Bible prophesy confirms that nuclear weapons will be used in the middle east war, but I do not believe that it will not be Israel that launches them.

Andy, here is what I do not understand about your position....

Why is it that you feel that Israel has the responsibility of protecting Lebanon's citizens, when clearly that is Lebanon's responsibility?

Why do you not see that Lebanon has placed her own citizens in danger because she has allowed her land to be the place of launch for attacks on Israel?

Andy, Iran and Iraq have both said that they will spare no means to support the Lebonese government against Israel... why is that not criticised by you as much as Israel is criticised? Why do you expect Israel to fight conventionally when her opponents do not? Because she is not terrorist and they are? Not so.. Andy, the terrorists are backed by very legitimate governments. Hezbollah has the full support of Iran and Syria and Iraq and I am at this point waiting for Egypt to open her mouth as well. Just because these nation states chose to use pawns should not make us to be blind to the fact that they are simply that pawns of legitimate nations that have vowed the anihilation of Israel. They allow others to put their name on the attcks, but the money the weapons, the manpower, the training, the logistics.. and the hate that comes forth.. comes forth from legitimate nations that should be in a perfect world accountable to the rules of conventional warfare that you would like to hold Israel to, but they are not.
 
Posted by Eduardo Grequi (Member # 3984) on :
 
Let me tell you that when people do not say "ENOUGH is ENOUGH" and protect themselves, the devil would have won the battle. I remember growing up as an Orthodox Jew and having bricks thrown thru my windows as a child. On one particular day a brick landed in the crib of my youngest brother and nearly killed him. My cousin at 8 years of age raped and murdered by Jewish haters. The brakes of my sister's car cut not once but three times and the perputrator were 2 American Muslims and 1 skin head. My sister was 7 months pregnant when she ended up hitting a large pick up truck and her un born baby murdered and the government officials slapped the hands of the assailants. Unless you truly see that Isreal is fighting not in a new covenant era but what they precieve to be old testament era- YOU AS OTHER CHRISTIANS fail a certain understanding of all the past events that lead up to this.

When children can not play (because fear of being persecuted relating to the color of their skin or the content of their ethincity that makes them uniquely how God created them) in their own backyard because fascist anti-semetic people-how unfair! Islamic parents train their own children to hate and kill and ruin other children pursuit of happiness even if you belong to a hindu religion.

WHen I look at this MIDDLE EAST, I see the coming of the storm, that will not reverse itself WITHOUT THE HAND AND PROVIDENCE OF GOD ALMIGHTY TO INTERVENE.

Truly Isreal, seems so brutal in its tatics, but Isreal and my people have servived by the will of God Almighty.

ANDY- Is your faith in Jesus based on your love for Him or is it based on the tradition of many familial generations in your geneology.

YOU COME ACROSS TO ME as an ANTI-SEMETIC AND Hater of Isreal. GOD COMMANDS ALL WHO BELIEVE IN HIM TO LOVE ONE ANOTHER- Isreal has tried and continue to try to live with peace and geniune concern for the neighbors.

NOW AS WE CHRISTIANS SAY- The ostrich head is almost out of the ground and ISREAL HAS SAID ENOGH IS ENOUGH

THESE ARE THE EVENTS AND COMING TO FULLNESS OF MATTHEW 24.

I BELIEVE AND AM PERSUADED THAT GOD WHO HAS CREATED THE WORLD, IS QUITE CAPABLE TO PRESERVE HIS WRITTEN WORD. EVEN IF IT IS TRANSLATED.

NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR GOD. AND IF WE HAVE LOVE GOD PRAY FOR PEACE then one day- JESUS THE BLESSED MESSIAH WILL COME TO ESTABLISH HIS KINGDOM.

REGARDLESS what other religions do or who deny Jesus, that will not prevent the Holy Word to come to fact. I will concede most JEWISH PEOPLE still do not recognize THE MESSIAHSHIP of Jesus, but according to the Tenet of Faith in Isreal they are awaiting their Messiah and still live in old testament rituals.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:


YOU COME ACROSS TO ME as an ANTI-SEMETIC AND Hater of Isreal. [/QB]

Why - because I dare to think for myself and don't blindly support everything that Israel does? Because I speak out against what I believe is wrong? Name me one time my posts can be construed as anti-semitic, that is biased or prejudiced against the jewish race? If not, I think you owe me an apology.

Anyway, helpforhomeschoolers, to answer your question, I don't think that Israel has the full responsibility of protecting Lebanese civilians - I believe it has a responsibility to act in a manner which minimises the suffering and deaths of those people who are not Hezbollah fighers, ordinary people who are caught up in this. I have never said that I expect no civilians to die - clearly this is not possible given the current set of circumstances.

I have only mentioned in passing my views on Iran, Syria and Hezbollah as I don't think there is any point debating them here as we all agree. We all abhor the terrorist acts they undertake, the rockets fired at Israel, the tacit support and 3rd party funding of suicide bombers and the statements made by people such as the president of Iran that he wants to se Israel wiped from the map.

Israel has stated that the particular aims of this military action are to damage Hezbollah to help secure Israel's northern border from the attacks of recent days, weeks and months. This is the context under which we must judge the current military action.

There is a wider strategic aim of securing Israel against its hostile neighbours (Iran and Syria mostly), but this cannot be achieved through bombing Lebanon - the action here is a small piece in a very large puzzle.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eduardo Grequi:

ANDY- Is your faith in Jesus based on your love for Him or is it based on the tradition of many familial generations in your geneology?


God will judge my faith Eduardo, not you.
 
Posted by Itty-Bitty Girl (Member # 4579) on :
 
Ahar,

I could tell you that Israel is dead wrong! Israel is using nasty weapons, and won’t ceasefire so that people can deliver supplies to Lebanon. And they hit highly populated areas.

Or I can say that Israel is mad right, yo! They are doing what they are supposed to do; they are taking a stand in this war. And Israel is the mark of criticism by the media, Lebanon sources, which have been wrongfully accusing them of misconduct. No nasty weapons were used, and the ceasefire was halted because of Hizbollah guerillas.

Two sides to every story.


Israel using chemical weapons: doctors
July 27, 2006 - 6:39AM

Lebanon is investigating reports from doctors that Israel has used weapons in its 15-day-old bombardment of southern Lebanon that have caused wounds they have never seen before.

"We are sending off samples tomorrow, but we have no confirmation yet that illegal weapons have been used," Health Minister Mohammed Khalife said.

The Israeli army said it had used only conventional weapons and ammunition in attacks aimed at Hizbollah guerrillas and nothing contravening international law.

Blackened bodies have been showing up at hospitals in southern Lebanon two weeks into the war between Israel and Hizbollah guerrillas that has seen at least 418 people, mostly civilians, killed in Lebanon and at least 42 Israelis.

Killed by Israeli air raids, the Lebanese dead are charred in a way local doctors, who have lived through years of civil war and Israeli occupation, say they have not seen before.

Bachir Cham, a Belgian-Lebanese doctor at the Southern Medical Centre in Sidon, received eight bodies after an Israeli air raid on nearby Rmeili which he said exhibited such wounds.

He has taken 24 samples from the bodies to test what killed them. He believes it is a chemical.

Cham said the bodies of some victims were "black as shoes, so they are definitely using chemical weapons. They are all black but their hair and skin is intact so they are not really burnt. It is something else."

"If you burnt someone with petrol their hair would burn and their skin would burn down to the bone. The Israelis are 100 per cent using chemical weapons."


Lebanese President Emile Lahoud has repeatedly accused Israel of using phosphorus bombs in its offensive.

Human Rights Watch, which has accused the Israeli army of using cluster bombs in populated areas of southern Lebanon, said it had not verified claims that Israel had used phosphorus.

"We are investigating but we haven't confirmed anything yet. We have seen phosphorus used before and we have seen it in the artillery stocks of the Israeli army in the north," said Peter Bouckaert, emergencies director at Human Rights Watch.

"Phosphorus shells do have a legitimate use in illuminating the battlefield at night. The offensive use of phosphorus would be a violation of international conventions."

Television footage shows some bodies, such as those of 20 civilians killed when an Israeli missile hit the van in which they were fleeing the border village of Marwaheen, blackened in the way Cham describes. No one knows what killed them.

"We are seeing abnormal burns, different from wars we've seen in the past. The corpses of these victims are shrinking to half their normal size. You think it is the corpse of a child at first but it turns out to be a grown man," said Raed Salman Zeinedine, director of Tyre Government Hospital.

"We've never seen anything like it but what the causes are I don't want to speculate. We have no scientific answer."

The Israel Army said it did not target civilians at all.


"We use only weapons and ammunition which will best hit our targets and cause least collateral damage," said army spokesman Captain Jacob Dallal.

"It could be that a body is burned from fire or the force of an explosion, but between that and suggesting we do something illegal under international law are two different things."

http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Israel-using-chemical-weapons-doctors/2006/07/27/1153816285823.html


Israel says no to UN ceasefire
(Filed: 29/07/2006)

Israel has rejected a request by the United Nations for a three-day cease-fire in Lebanon to deliver food and medicine to civilians in the war zone.

Avi Pazner, a government spokesman, said Israel already had opened safe corridors across Lebanon for such shipments and but Hizbollah guerrillas were blocking them.

On Friday Jan Egeland, the UN humanitarian chief, called for a three-day truce between Israel and Hizbollah to evacuate trapped civilians and replenish supplies to areas cut off by the fighting.

He said thousands of children, elderly and disabled had been stranded after more than two weeks of fighting, and supplies were dwindling.
Meanwhile, relief aid, including 20,000 blankets, 1000 tarpaulins, medical kits and food, continued to arrive by air and sea.

Condoleezza Rice, US Secretary of State, is due to return to Israel today to discuss US President George W. Bush's call for multinational force to be dispatched to Lebanon to help its government regain control of the southern part of its country from the Hizbollah militia.

Ms Rice will meet with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Jerusalem tonight to talk about the makeup of the multinational force and speeding up the delivery of humanitarian aid in the country.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/07/29/utruce.xml


Anyone could be right, but for now I’ll side with Israel. Arabs hate Israelis, they got plenty reason to lie on them.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Originally posted by Eduardo Grequi:

ANDY- Is your faith in Jesus based on your love for Him or is it based on the tradition of many familial generations in your geneology?

Ahar:
God will judge my faith Eduardo, not you.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Andy in your response in your profile:

Are you a Born-again Christian?: Define born again? I grew up going to church [Smile]

With your Anglican/Catholic tradition one might have a decided problem understanding what it means to be born again.

The Roman Catholic church, for example, considers that "Baptism is ... the sacrament by which we are born again of water and the Holy Ghost." though the term is not frequently used by Catholics.
This is also the belief held by Eastern Christianity, Anglicanism, and Lutheranism, among other Catholic traditions.

The idea of being born again carries with it the theological idea that a Christian is a new creation, given a fresh start by the action of God, freed from a sinful past life and able to begin a new life in relationship with Christ via the Holy Spirit. John Wesley and Christians associated with early Methodism referred to the born again experience as "the New Birth".

One is not born-again when one is baptised, especially as an infant.

One is not born again by warming a pew for many years.

One is born-again when one personally and specificly comes to Christ, confesses with their heart that they are a sinner and receives Jesus into their heart and their life.

Romans 10:
8: But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;
9: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
10: For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11: For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
13: For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
 
Posted by Eduardo Grequi (Member # 3984) on :
 
Andy-

WHen I say you appear to be anti-semetic or hater of Isreal it is based on the fact, not once have you conceded that by the authority of the Holy Bible which states those who bless Isreal will be bless. Not once have you said you as a Christian support Isreal in the light as the scriptures says.

As for your faith, that is between you and God, but as the bible says in James- faith without work is dead. Since dead, decaying life stinks, I am assuming James is saying that if your faith does not challenge you to do good, then it stinks.

Here is another question?

Do you believe Isreal and the Rabbinical authority believe they are in the new testament or do they still precieve to follow the old testament aka convenant.?

I trully believe Isreal could had done things different to spare innocent lives- It aches me, to know that my family in Isreal are causing pain to my friends in Lebanon who are Christians. When I hear of the killing of children, women it brings me to tears and to a prayerful heart that God would intervene immediately.

Because no man is above the law of God and that includes us stubborn and stiffnecked Jews, we as individuals will have to give an account of our obedience to His supreme Law. As Jesus put it- TO LOVE GOD WITH ALL YOUR BODY ,SOUL, AND SPIRIT AND TO LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF. EVEN JESUS SAID, LOVE YOUR ENEMY WHO DESPITEFULLY ABUSE YOU!

Sometimes things become muzzled- IN THE PURSUIT of God that we tend to forget the compassion for all mankind regardless of who they are.

Andy, when you heard about what passed in London when bombs blew up and maimed and kill people, how did you intially react and later what did you do?
 
Posted by Gramajo320 (Member # 4667) on :
 
Ahar,

As christians we must stand with Israel who is the apple of God's eye. I have always had a very special love for all Jewish people and for Israel and I've always wanted to visit Israel. A friend and neighbor of mine did get to go to Israel and she said she had a wonderful visit there.

All of your criticism of Israel will never change God's mind. You cannot change my mind either for I will always stand by the Jewish people and Israel. You fail to recognize or admit to the fact that Hezbollah began all of this - they are the bad guys in this conflict - not Israel. Israel will always have the right to defend Israelis and Israel the same as any other country defends their country. Hezbollah and Hamas need to be disarmed due to their being such evil terrorists who do such barbaric evil deeds. Yet you wish to blame Israel for everything. Your postings would make all terrorists very happy to read for that's exactly what they like for everyone to believe - that Israel is the bad guy. However Israel is in the right in defending themselves and their country. They would love to live in peace but does any of their enemies let them? The answer to that is no. Israel is within their rights and I stand by them!
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
Rose - I'm glad that you've looked at both sides. You've now made a decision based on research, rather than blind dogmatism, and are starting to see the complexity of anything that happens in the middle east.

Caretaker - my response on my profile was meant to be part joke (hence the smiley). I never describe myself to other people using the term 'born again' as I really don't like the term. It's far more associated in the UK with wishywashy happy-clappy Christians, rather than the serious nature of faith. I would identify myself with the text you posted:

"One is born-again when one personally and specificly comes to Christ, confesses with their heart that they are a sinner and receives Jesus into their heart and their life."

To be honest, I don't think you really need the phrase 'born again'. Either you are a Christian or you're not.

Eduardo - have you forgotton the message that you sent me thanking me for posting the link to the news item regarding the recognition of Jews in England? If I was anti-semitic, why would I post this.

You state: "I trully believe Isreal could had done things different to spare innocent lives ". Why do you not speak out about this? Messages do not have to be simple, sometimes they can be complex - we can say that it is right for Israel to defend itself while criticising some of its actions in doing this. You quote that 'those who bless Israel will be blessed' - God does not object to those who speak out against sin. I believe that in the currently military action, Israel has committed some sins (that is NOT to say that I think the entire operation is wrong) and I fell a duty to speak out about it.

Gramajo320 - have you even read any of my posts? Where have I blamed Israel for everything, where have I failed to recognise that Hezbollah are terrorists? You haven't bothered to try to look or understand what I've been saying - you simply saw that someone didn't 100% agree with your view of Israel's actions and jumped to make untrue and unfounded accusations.

Eduardo asked what I did when the London bombs exploded. My first reaction was to make sure that my soon-to-be wife and friends were safe - my wife uses the bus route where the bomb exploded and several friends use the underground stations and routes where the bombs exploded. It was pretty shocking as I had just been walking past the spot where the bus exploded an hour before. I didn't do much work that day or the day after, but life had to go on as I was getting married within the week and there were a lot of preparations to be made.
 
Posted by Eduardo Grequi (Member # 3984) on :
 
I remember the day twin towers went down. I was working and then I remember one of my mothers sister worked in the towers. On the day they went down, she clearing out her space. She was retiring after 45 years of work. Some type exec secretary or something. She died in the towers along with many other people. THE DAY THAT CHANGED AMERICA CONCERNING TERRORIST.

ABOUT TWO WEEKS LATER WHEN A FLIGHT TOOK OFF FROM TEL AVIV TO GO TO THE UKRAINE, KIEV- MY FATHERS KIN WERE ON THE FLIGHT. I WAS TO SPONSOR MY COUNSIN HERE IN THE US SINCE I HAVE KEPT UP WITH SPEAKING YIDDISH. THE FLIGHT WAS SHOT DOWN OVER THE BLACK SEA. IT WASN'T TILL SIX MONTHS THAT THE RED CROSS WAS ABLE TO VERIFY THIS. IN ALL I HAD LOST TWO AUNTS AND TWO COUNSINS BECAUSE OF TERRORIST WHEN THE TOWERS FELL.

DO I HATE ISLAM?. NO, BUT I DO BELIEVE THE UNDERLINE AGENDA OF ISLAM IS TO BRING IN A PRESIDENT OR IN YOUR CASE A PRIME MINISTER AND SLOWLY AND SUBLIMELY CONVERT THE COUNTRIES TO FASCIST ISLAM AND REMAIN IN POWER.

I DO NOT KNOW IF YOU KNEW THAT 1 IN 3 PEOPLE IN FRANCE UNDER THE AGE OF 35 IS ISLAMIC? NOW ACCORDING TO A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN EUROPE, STUDENTS PERFER ORIENTAL CONCEPT OF SELF CONCEPTUALISM BASED ON YOGA AND BUDDAHIST DOGA. IN SOME OF THE AREAS HERE IN THE USA AND LATIN AMERICA THE CONCEPT BAHAI HAS CAUGHT ON. IT IS BASED ON A MELTING OF WESTERN AND MIDDLE EASTERN PHOLOSPHY. SOMETHING LIKE THE DRUZ. THE CENTER OF BAHAI OF ALL PLACES IS IN ISREAL. GO FIGURE.

I HAVE NOT FORGOT ABOUT THE POST ON ISREAL SINCE YOU MENTION IT. OH AND BY THE WAY ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE THINGS ARE GOING TO GET MUCH WORSE BEFORE THEY GET BETTER.

IF THE WORLD IN GENERAL HATES CHRISTIAN DOGMA AND ISLAMIC DOGMA, THEN COMBINING OF THE TWO BAHAI WILL BE THE TREND BEFORE THE END.

THERE IS A FOLKLORE SAYING IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND AMONGST THE JEWS. HE WHO RULES BABYLON, WILL RULE THE WORLD BEFORE THE GREAT AND AWESOME DAY OF THE LORD.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eduardo Grequi:

I DO NOT KNOW IF YOU KNEW THAT 1 IN 3 PEOPLE IN FRANCE UNDER THE AGE OF 35 IS ISLAMIC? NOW ACCORDING TO A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN EUROPE, STUDENTS PERFER ORIENTAL CONCEPT OF SELF CONCEPTUALISM BASED ON YOGA AND BUDDAHIST DOGA. IN SOME OF THE AREAS HERE IN THE USA AND LATIN AMERICA THE CONCEPT BAHAI HAS CAUGHT ON. IT IS BASED ON A MELTING OF WESTERN AND MIDDLE EASTERN PHOLOSPHY. SOMETHING LIKE THE DRUZ. THE CENTER OF BAHAI OF ALL PLACES IS IN ISREAL. GO FIGURE.


That seems pretty high for France, especially as the census in France doesn't collect any information on religion. The only figure I could find in the couple of minutes of googling is approx 5 million Muslims in France out of a population of 60 million (less than 10%).

You're probably right in students preferring eastern religions. I think that we have to recognise our part in causing this - one of the key ways that we can bring people to christianity is to provide a good example.
 
Posted by BrazilianMommy (Member # 4787) on :
 
Comment about the comment just above mine:

Christianity seems to be the only Eastern religion that did not caught up in the Eastern world. So much that many people thing it is a Western thing.

Sorry my English, it is 12:42am here in Seattle.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
I thought that as I have spent a lot of time criticising Israel's actions I should come back and say when I think they are doing something right. After the tradgedy at Qana, Israel have stopped the bombardment of the towns and cities (including Beruit) further away from the south of the country. I think this is a great step in relieving the suffering of the Lebanese civilians. Israel is also sending more ground troops in - I think that this is also a good thing as artillery shells, bombs and missiles are less descriminating than a soldier on the ground.

PS The link below is an editorial from today's The Times by David Aaronovitch - generally a good man for a balanced view:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22369-2293538,00.html
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Golden Report

Why we Jews are concerned about this coming Wednesday.
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2006
- written by jerry golden Printer-friendly version
E-mail to a Friend

Click to Read Reviews & Rate this Article



Every year on the 9th of AV (this year August 3rd) the Jews of Israel hold their breath hoping that nothing bad will happen. The 1st Temple was destroyed by the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar on the 9th of AV, 586 BCE (BC); 2nd Temple was burnt down by the Romans under Titus on the same date in 70 CE (AD).

Many disasters have happened to the Jewish people on this date, since the fall of the 2nd Temple Tish’ah be-Av has been the date of terrible persecutions to the Jewish people. The Romans capture of Bar Kokhiba’s last stronghold (135 CE). On the same date the following year a pagan shrine was erected on the Temple Mount. The exile of the Jews from medieval England 1290 and from Spain on the same date in 1492 and the slaughter of Jews during the Holocaust (Sho’ah) just to mention a few.

The war we are now faced with here in Israel and Lebanon is at a very important phase in this war and many now consider this to be the beginning of the 3rd World War. If Israel is somehow forced to concede giving Hizbullah a perceived victory it will mean terrible things for the US and the world in general. What I find so amazing is how the UN and the EU continue to blame Israel for everything, never mentioning the terror of over 1700 rockets that has been fired into Israel, causing many deaths and injuries. Or the fact that Hizbullah is a terrorist organization that has taken over Lebanon. It is way past time that we try to understand why the UN and the EU never blame Islamic Arab (Terrorist) organizations, and the answer can be summed up in one world "OIL". No one wants to pay $20 a gallon for gas. Little Israel has no oil, in fact we have a very small piece of land to grow things on, and most of it was once considered worthless, but just as God has prophesied the Desert has bloomed.

Today we hear Hizbullah shouting "death to America" and if you think they are just shouting that for the fun of it, you have another shocking revelation coming right at you. And if Rice or Bush is forced somehow to join the cry for a premature cease-fire before we are able to destroy or at least seriously damage the military capabilities of Hizbullah. You will see millions in the Islamic Arab world join the cry "death to America" and Hizbullah will recruit them by the hundreds of thousands into their ranks.

In 1981 the world condemned Israel for destroying the Iraqi nuclear reactor, but today we are thanked for doing it. Once again it’s Israel that is on the front line against the enemy that wants to take over the world, but all we hear is condemnation from those we are actually saving. The rest of the world has a choice, to allow Israel to totally destroy Hizbullah here and now or fight them later on your own front door.

I was an IDF soldier in the 1982 war when we went after the PLO for shooting these same deadly Katyushas rockets at us. We had Arafat backed up to the sea in west Beirut and ready to finish him and his group of terrorist off. But their rescuers came for them, it was the US 6th fleet. The US picked them all up at the docks in Beirut and took them to Tunis, they licked their wounds and today we are still fighting them because we were not allowed to finish the job. We don’t need that to happen again, and if anyone believes a multinational force will stop Hizbullah and all the other Islamic terrorists groups to become rational civilized folks, you have another thought coming. This is a spiritual war; good against evil and if I need to tell anyone who the good guys are I am wasting my time writing this article. This is a battle not only for Israel’s survival but quiet possibly for yours as well.

Daily I come in contact with Moslems and they all have the same detached look in their eyes, they have been completely taken over with the evil of Islam. They can only think of one thing to kill the Infidels (you and me). I am asked several times every week if I am frightened or if I plan to leave, the answer to both is NO, this is where God has placed us and this is where we will stay until the end, when or however that may occur. I know that God has called us to this Ministry and we will continue with ours eyes on Him and no other. Believing the Ruach Ha Koddesh to lead and guide us in the way we should and will go and that many Jewish lives will be saved. There is nothing the Devil would like more than to see you and others back away out of fear or wrong decisions. Knowing that this is a Body Ministry and everyone he can convince to turn away with their financial help is damage to what God has called us to accomplish in His Name. I have two prayers concerning this possibility, I pray daily that God will bless those who reach out to bless Israel be it this Ministry or any other in Israel. I pray that for every one the Devil is able to steal from the hands of God that a hundred more will take his or her place.

We are very close to moving this part of the ministry out in a very powerful way, and there has never been a time when your support is more important than today. If you will pray over this I know God will speak to you, just sit everything aside clear your mind of your daily problems and ask God to speak to you in your quiet time with Him.

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, pray for our son Joel and all the IDF soldiers. Pray for this Ministry and your part in it. Shalom, jerry golden
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
Interesting first bit about what's happened on that particular date, spolied by the usual propaganda about the EU hating Israel and supporting terrorists - he obviously hasn't bothered to read all of Jan Egerland's comments.

Anyway... I think the author missed, given that the author was around in 1982, the fact that one of the large influences changing Israel's operations in Lebanon in 1983 was the tradegdy in Qana, with history repeating itself this week in Qana again. Quite ironic really, in the context of the date mentioned in the beginning of the article.
 
Posted by Kindgo (Member # 2) on :
 
The Qana?

I am finding articles now where the IDF says the building collapsed 12 hours after their airstrike, and that building wasn't even targeted.

What brought it down? Did Hezbollah blow up their own building to besmirch Israel? Beginning to look very fishy to me. [cool_shades]
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
Ahar seems to have made this point 8 times already... but I do have a hard time reading the message of Jesus, and imagining him walking through the destruction in Lebanon with approval of what´s happening.

Agree 100% with the idea that one can support Israel´s right to self defense, with giving them a "blank check" to do whatever they want.

On these boards, I sense more emotion on this issue from people getting excited about the rapture as a result of this fighting, than feeling emotion for children who suffer, die, lose mothers, families split, and as a minor footnote, property distruction. And we haven´t even started on displaced families... you know how mad and upset some people get when their company transfers them across the country? Imagine having your home destroyed, no government that is able to help you, no insurance, and simply no choice.

Everyone on this board (me included) is completely spoiled and is completely out of touch with what real people are experiencing at this moment in Lebanon and Israel. And for any of us to make a simple black and white judgement in this complex issue is pure ignorance.

In the bible, Israel did many things that were wrong in the eyes of God...
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
http://directory.kol-israel.com/asites/?

After several hours of intense fighting in and around a hospital in the eastern Lebanon town of Baalbek, IDF commando forces on Wednesday morning took a number of Hizbullah officials captive.

Reportedly, an IAF helicopter dropped special forces soldiers at the hospital late Tuesday night. Heavy shooting with Hizbullah operatives on the premises ensued.

After inspecting the identification of everyone in the hospital, the IDF soldiers proceeded to arrest several people described in a CNN report as Hizbullah officials, who were later transported back into Israel. The officials names and positions in the organization were not revealed.

No IDF soldiers were wounded in the operation, an army spokesperson told The Jerusalem Post.

Earlier Wednesday morning, Hizbullah spokesman Hussein Rahal said, "A group of Israeli commandos was brought to the hospital by a helicopter. They entered the hospital and are trapped inside as our fighters opened fire on them and fierce fighting is still raging."

In a statement released Wednesday, the IDF confirmed that Hizbullah operatives had been captured and that others had been killed. This is the first confirmation by the IDF of operations so deep inside the Bekaa Valley, a known Hizbullah stronghold.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

An earlier report told that Hizbullah had set-up headquarters in the hospital. They chose to enter and capture rather than bomb and destroy the hospital. It says a great deal.

Packs of rabid wolves must not be allowed to run wild near the homestead. The threat must be eliminated. Every time Israel backs down and makes concessions they are brutally attacked.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

An earlier report told that Hizbullah had set-up headquarters in the hospital. They chose to enter and capture rather than bomb and destroy the hospital. It says a great deal.


This is the kind of military action that not only reduces civilian casualties, but is far more effective in getting at Hezbollah. I hope this is the approach used from now on
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kindgo:
The Qana?

I am finding articles now where the IDF says the building collapsed 12 hours after their airstrike, and that building wasn't even targeted.

What brought it down? Did Hezbollah blow up their own building to besmirch Israel? Beginning to look very fishy to me. [cool_shades]

Can you post links to the IDF statements on this?
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
http://directory.kol-israel.com/asites/?

At a press conference on Sunday night, Air Force Chief of Staff Brig.-Gen. Amir Eshel said the building was struck by IAF missiles a little after midnight, but only collapsed seven hours later, at about 7 a.m.

Eshel said he could not explain what caused the structure to collapse so many hours after it was hit, and speculated, while stressing that he had no conclusive evidence, about whether Hizbullah had played a role in what had transpired, perhaps by firing on the building itself.

Another possibility that has been raised is that the building sustained damage from the original strike, but collapsed only later from structural damage or the impact of further IAF strikes nearby. Alternatively, the building may have contained Hizbullah weaponry that detonated after the strike.

MK Benny Elon (National Union) suggested Tuesday that Hizbullah may have played a role in the building's collapse in an attempt to prevent an international force from entering Lebanon and to place blame on Israel.

"In general, Hizbullah prevents citizens from moving from places that the IDF is attacking. This time it was more," said Elon. "It wasn't just prohibiting citizens from leaving this time, it was bringing refugees that aren't residents of Kafr Kana to areas that they know are going to be attacked. And to be sure it's attacked, Hizbullah fires from the building next door in order to create the crisis and in order to create the pictures."

According to Elon, Hizbullah took such action in an attempt to recreate the situation at Kafr Kana in 1996, which resulted in a withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon.

"What they wanted to do was 'deja vu.' Last time, Kafr Kana was the end of the conflict... and this time they expected that the results would be the same: cease-fire," said Elon. "They needed the cease fire immediately because of the results of the war so far and their fear that UN Resolution 1559 can be enforced and fulfilled by the international force."

According to Elon, the IDF had "sources and information which were sure that civilians had left the area after warning pamphlets were dropped," but the information turned out to be mistaken.

According to one of the Web sites raising questions about the affair, Israel Insider, "the accumulating evidence suggests another explanation for what happened at Kana. The scenario would be a setup in which the time between the initial bombing near the building and morning reports of its collapse would have been used to 'plant' bodies killed in previous fighting... place them in the basement, and then engineer a 'controlled demolition' to fake another Israeli attack.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://directory.kol-israel.com/asites/?

5. Preview (Abstract/Citation) Full Text (No Photos) 57 killed after IAF strike on Kafr Kana. Israel adamant that fight goes on * Air force asks why building only collapsed 7 hours after it was hit * Village was source of Katyusha fire
YAAKOV KATZ, AP contributed to the report.; Jerusalem Post; Jul 31, 2006; pg. 01;

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://directory.kol-israel.com/asites/?


Lebanese report: Hezbollah planted disabled children in basement to die
By Israel Insider staff and partners August 1, 2006

A French language Lebanese publication, citing an unnamed source in Hezbollah, has claimed that the organization placed a rocket launcher on the roof of the notorious building in Qana to provoke an Israeli attack and brought invalid children inside to serve as victims and blacken Israel's name.

The Lebanese magazine LIBANOSCOPIE, associated with Christian elements which support the anti-Syrian movement called the "March 14 Forces," report that Hizbullah masterminded a plan that would result in the killing of innocents in Qana, in an attempt to foil Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora's "Seven Points Plan" calling for deployment of the Lebanese army in southern Lebanon and the disarming of Hizbullah. The magazine reported:



Meanwhile, the Lebanese Red Cross reported on Monday that only 28 bodies, 19 of them children, were removed from the rubble. The count is half that of the 50-60 bodies still being reported by news agencies, quoting Lebanese security officials.

"We have it from a credible source that Hezbollah, alarmed by Siniora's plan, has concocted an incident that would help thwart the negotiations.... Hezbollah gunmen placed a rocket launcher on the roof in Qana and brought disabled children inside, in a bid to provoke a response by the Israeli Air Force. In this way, they were planning to take advantage of the death of innocents and curtail the diplomatic initiative," the site stated.

The site's editors claimed that Hezbollah staged the event because of Qana's symbolic significance: "They used Qana because the village had already turned into a symbol for massacring innocent civilians, and so they set up 'Qana 2'." The incident has indeed been dubbed "The second Qana massacre" by the Arab media.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Staged photos
 
Posted by Kindgo (Member # 2) on :
 
Thank you Drew.. [Kiss]
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Thank you Drew.. [Kiss]

--------------------
God bless,
Kindgo

++++++++++++++++++++++++

God bless you Sis;

Psalm 83:
1: Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.
2: For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
3: They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4: They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5: For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:
6: The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes;
7: Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre;
8: Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah.
9: Do unto them as unto the Midianites; as to Sisera, as to Jabin, at the brook of Kison:
10: Which perished at Endor: they became as dung for the earth.
11: Make their nobles like Oreb, and like Zeeb: yea, all their princes as Zebah, and as Zalmunna:
12: Who said, Let us take to ourselves the houses of God in possession.
13: O my God, make them like a wheel; as the stubble before the wind.
14: As the fire burneth a wood, and as the flame setteth the mountains on fire;
15: So persecute them with thy tempest, and make them afraid with thy storm.
16: Fill their faces with shame; that they may seek thy name, O LORD.
17: Let them be confounded and troubled for ever; yea, let them be put to shame, and perish:
18: That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
If it is true, Hezbollah can add that to their already long list of nappaling crimes. However, the first casualty of war is usally the truth, and one man's truth is another's propaganda.
 
Posted by Kindgo (Member # 2) on :
 
A List Of Facts:

1. Nationhood and Jerusalem - Israel became a nation in 1312 B.C.E., two thousand years before the rise of Islam.

2. Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the modern State of Israel.

3. Since the Jewish conquest in 1272 B.C.E. the Jews have had dominion over the land for one thousand years with a continuous presence in the land for the past 3,300 years.

4. Arabs have only had control of Israel twice - from 634 until the Crusader invasion in June 1099, and from 1292 until the year 1517 when they were dispelled by the Turks in their conquest.

5. For over 3,300 years, Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital. Jerusalem has never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even when the Jordanians occupied Jerusalem, they never sought to make it their capital, and Arab leaders did not come to visit.

6. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in Tanach, the Jewish Holy Scriptures. Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran. There are vague references to Jerusalem in the Hadiths - stories about Mohammed - that he stopped his night journey at ''the edge'' - at the edge of the Temple mount.

7. King David established the city of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Mohammed never came to Jerusalem.

8. Jews pray facing Jerusalem. Some Muslims (i.e. those between Israel and Saudi Arabia) pray with their backs toward Jerusalem.

9. Arab and Jewish Refugees - In 1948 the Arab refugees were encouraged to leave Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge the land of Jews. Sixty eight percent left without ever seeing an Israeli soldier.

10. The Jewish refugees were forced to flee from Arab lands due to Arab brutality, persecution and pogroms.

11. The number of Arab refugees who left Israel in 1948 is estimated to be around 630,000. The number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands is estimated to be the same.

12. Arab refugees were INTENTIONALLY not absorbed or integrated into the Arab lands to which they fled, despite the vast Arab territory. Out of the 100,000,000 refugees since World War II, theirs is the only refugee group in the world that has never been absorbed or integrated into their own peoples' lands. Jewish refugees were completely absorbed into Israel, a country no larger than the state of New Jersey.

13. The Arab - Israeli Conflict - The Arabs are represented by eight separate nations, not including the Palestinians. There is only one Jewish nation. The Arab nations initiated all five wars and lost. Israel defended itself each time and won.

14. The P.L.O.'s Charter still calls for the destruction of the State of Israel. Israel has given the Palestinians most of the West Bank land, autonomy under the Palestinian Authority, and has supplied them with weapons.

15. Under Jordanian rule, Jewish holy sites were desecrated and the Jews were denied access to places of worship. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian sites have been preserved and made accessible to people of all faiths.

16. The U.N. Record on Israel and the Arabs - Of the 175 Security Council resolutions passed before 1990, 97 were directed against Israel.

17. Of the 690 General Assembly resolutions voted on before 1990, 429 were directed against Israel.

18. The U.N was silent while 58 Jerusalem Synagogues were destroyed by the Jordanians.

19. The U.N. was silent while the Jordanians systematically desecrated the ancient Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives.

20. The U.N. was silent while the Jordanians enforced an apartheid-like policy of preventing Jews from visiting the Temple Mount and the Western Wall.

http://www.middleeastfacts.com/middle-east-facts.php


More Facts:

For those of us who believe that the "Israeli Occupation" has been bad for the Palestinian people, these facts may change your perception. The "occupation" seems to have brought nothing but good to the Palestinians - we can only imagine how much worse they would be if Israel hadn't helped them!


1. During 20 years of Arab rule Palestinian male life expectancy grew from 42 to 44. During the next 20 years of Israeli rule Palestinian male life expectancy grew from 44 to 63.

2. During 20 years of Arab rule Palestinian female life expectancy grew from 45 to 46. During the next 20 years of Israeli rule Palestinian female life expectancy grew from 46 to 67.

3. During 20 years of Arab rule Palestinian infant mortality rate decreased from 200 per thousand to 170 per thousand. During the next 20 years of Israeli rule Palestinian infant mortality rate decreased from 170 per thousand to 60 per thousand.

4. During 20 years of Arab rule Palestinian cruse death rate decreased from 21 per thousand to 19 per thousand. During next 20 years of Israeli rule Palestinian infant mortality rate decreased from 19 per thousand to 6 per thousand.

5. Before 1967, when Israel's rule began, only 113 hospitals had been built in the territories. By the time of 1989 Israel had helped establish more than three times that number to 387.

6. Before 1967 only 23 Mother & Child Centers had been established. After 1989 about six times as many could be found. (135)

7. Malaria, which had existed in the territories before 1967 was finally eliminated during the Israeli rule.

8. Israel also more than tripled the number of Palestinian teachers and boosted the Palestinian educational system by establishing a number of universities. Among those universities were the College of Scientists (Abu Dis) - est. 1982, the College of Social Welfare (El Bira) - est. 1979, the College of Religion (Beit Hanina) - est. 1978 and the Islamic College in Hebron- est.1971.

9. This was not the only effect Israeli rule had on the Palestinian education system and the Palestinian people. Before 1967 the percentage of illiterates on average had been 27.8% among men and among women even higher at 65.1%. By 1983 Israel had helped reduce illiteracy to only 13.5% among men and 38.9% among women

http://www.middleeastfacts.com/middle-east-facts2.php


What Does The Koran Say?

People assume that the Koran (Q'aran - Muslim holy scriptures) has anti-Israel passages. While there is no doubt some level of anti-Jewish sentiment in the Koran, there are many passages that are actually in support of a Jewish state of Israel! The following are eleven passages showing the support for a Jewish state in the Muslim holy scriptures.


Sura 2:190

A case could even be made that Israel's victory over the Arabs in the 1948 war was a judgement by Allah against the Arabs for their apostasy in opposing the Zionists. This would be their just reward for transgressing Sura 2:190, which says, "Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities."

Sura 5:21

Moses is quoted as telling the Jews to "enter into the Holy Land which Allah has assigned to you". While Mohammed later condemns the Jews for their sins and their refusal to accept his message, he never says that, as punishment, Allah has revoked our title to the Holy Land. Therefore the title still stands, and Muslim anti-Zionists are apostates.

Sura 9:5

“Then when the Sacred Months have passed, kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and observe the Islamic lifestyle, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful.” - Does this sound like a peaceful religion to you?

Sura 16:126

"If ye punish, then punish with the like of that wherewith ye were afflicted." Yet Ariel Sharon's nonviolent, if provocative, visit to the Temple Mount was met with rioting,
including the use of firebombs and AK-47's.


Sura 17:4

"And We [Allah] gave (clear) warning to the children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and be elated with mighty arrogance (and twice would they be punished)!" The succeeding verses tell us that the punishment referred to was banishment from the land. But "twice" means twice, not three times; hence the Jews, having been banished from the land once by the Babylonians and a second time by Rome, will never again be banished from the land. According to the Qur'an, Israel is an eternal nation.

Moreover, "twice would they do mischief on the earth" means twice, not three times; hence the Jews will never again do mischief on the earth. In particular, the Jews cannot bear moral responsibility for the Palestinian refugee problem.

Sura 17:7

The Palestinians deny that there ever was a Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. But Sura 17:7 records the destruction of the First Temple by Babylon and the Second Temple by Rome, and Mohammed never contests the Bible's claim that the Temples were in Jerusalem.


Sura 17:104

The Jews' return from 19 centuries of exile is actually the fulfillment of Islamic prophecy. Sura 17:104 says that 'And we said to the Children of Israel afterwards, "Go live into this land. When the final prophecy comes to pass, we will summon you all in one group."'


Sura 60:9

Moreover, Sura 60:9 forbids aiding the enemies of the Muslim people. Contrast this with the Palestinians' continued support of Saddam Hussein, whose hands are red with the blood of Iranian, Kurdish, and Kuwaiti Muslims.


Sura 83:1

"Woe to those that deal in fraud"; yet Yasir Arafat reneged on his promise to guard Joseph's Tomb in Nablus after the Israeli troops withdrew.


http://www.middleeastfacts.com/koran.php


Thought this would be good for everyone who wants to know the history of Israel from 1850 to the present. Good web site with factual information:

http://www.eretzyisroel
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kindgo:
A List Of Facts:


I would probably call it 'a list of points carefully selected to support a single point of view' and the website an 'argument to a particular view drawing points from history'. Whether or not it represents your point of view, you can't say it's comprehensive or impartial.

I certainly wouldn't describe the occupation of Gaza or the West Bank as being beneficial overall to either the Palestinians or Israelis.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Kana Massacre a Fake

* Sometime after dawn a call went out to journalists and rescue workers to come to the scene. Though Hizbullah has been claiming that civilians could not freely flee the scene due to Israeli destruction of bridges and roads, the journalists and rescue teams from nearby Tyre had no problem getting there.

* Lebanese rescue teams did not start evacuating the building until after the camera crews came. The absence of a real rescue effort was explained by saying that equipment was lacking. There were no scenes of live or injured people being extracted.

* There was little blood, CNN's Wedeman noted, concluding that the victims appeared to have died while they were sleeping - despite the thunderous Israeli air attacks. Rescue workers equipped with cameras were removing the bodies from one opening in the collapsed structure, and journalists were not allowed near it.

* Rescue workers carrying the victims on stretchers occasionally flipped up the blankets so that cameras could show the faces and bodies of the dead. But, Koret noted, the ashen-gray faces of the victims gave cause to think that the bodies looked like they had been dead for days.

* Photos of the rescue operation transmitted all over the world are "extremely suspicious," Spencer writes, citing work by EU Referendum showing numerous anomalies in the photos. "Most notably," he writes, "the dating of the various photos suggests that the same bodies were paraded before reporters on different occasions, each time as if they had just been pulled from the rubble. [In addition], some workers are wearing different gear in different photos, yet clearly carrying the same corpse."

* The Christian Lebanese (French-language) website LIBANOSCOPIE has charged that Hizbullah staged the entire incident in order to stimulate calls for a ceasefire, thereby staving off its destruction by Israel and Lebanese plans to rid themselves of this terrorist plague.

Spencer concludes, "Americans and Westerners are not used to dealing with carefully orchestrated and large-scale deception of this kind. It is time that it be recognized as a weapon of warfare, and an extremely potent one at that."
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
Interesting that the IDF offical investigation couldn't come to a firm conclusion to this. My knowledge of Israeli newspapers and media is not very good, so I don't know where Israeli National News fits - is it the equivalent of the National Inquirer, Washington Post, New York Times or Wall Street journal?

I usually read the Jerusalem Post as it's a pretty widespread and famous paper - they don't seem to go very much on this theory
(http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525796295&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull).

It would not surprise me if Hezbollah had some hand in this but I would be surprised if they had deliberately directly murdered their own people (as in herding them into a building and then blowing it up) as I don't think they have done that before - putting people deliberately in harms way sounds much more like what they would do.
 
Posted by Kindgo (Member # 2) on :
 
Evidence Mounts that Kana "Massacre" Was a Fake

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
The world awoke this Sunday to the news that an Israeli airstrike had killed 57 Lebanese civilians, leading Israel to stop airstrikes for 2 days - but evidence shows the "massacre" was just a fraud.

The supposed massacre caused a major turnabout in world diplomacy. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice suddenly canceled her plans to fly to Beirut, saying "my work towards a ceasefire is really here [in Jerusalem] today." The implication was clearly that the onus was now upon Israel. French President Jacques Chirac condemned Israel's "unjustified action which demonstrates more than ever the need for an immediate ceasefire," Jordan's King Abdullah called it an "ugly crime," and other world leaders echoed these sentiments.


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=109072


Lebanese hospital: Number of casualties from Qana strike is 28, not 52 (Israel Radio)


http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/ShTickers.html


Stage-Managed Massacre
By Robert Spencer
FrontPageMagazine.com | August 2, 2006

“The Israeli air strike on the Lebanese village of Qana early Sunday morning did more than kill 57 civilians,” says Jefferson Morley in the Washington Post. “According to a wide range of commentary in the international media, it inflamed already boiling public opinion in the Arab world against Israel, undermined what little support the United States has among the Lebanese people, and illuminated the continuing inability of Israel and the United States to achieve their goal of decisively weakening Hezbollah.”

The Hindustan Times editorialized that “with Qana, one senses that the Israelis’ definition of ‘collateral damage’ has started to bear a striking resemblance to that of the very terrorist organisation that they are keen to destroy.” At a rally outside the State Department building protesting the Qana “massacre” on Monday, Leftist protestors chanted, “Hey, Rice! What do you say? How many kids have you killed today?”; “Israel Out of Lebanon! Ceasefire, Now”; and “Shame! Shame! Shame, on you!” An Australian Muslim in Qana told Australia’s Herald Sun: “I would say a few hundred have died. This isn’t war, it’s genocide.”

Except for one little detail: it is increasingly clear that the Qana “massacre” was a stage-managed Hizballah production, designed precisely to enflame international sentiment against Israel and compel the Israelis to accept a ceasefire that would enable the jihad terrorist group to gain some time to recover from the Israeli attacks.

more (lists principle evidence) ......... http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=23655
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
From what I´m reading from major well established news sources is that the IDF is saying Kana happened as a result of an intelligence failure. I guess I don´t really care to argue this on much. Israel is in the position of power in the conflict economically and militarily. Its no surprise to me that a far weaker opponent would use "unconventional tactics". Heavily outnumbered groups usually do. Take a look at the history of guerillia warfare in Latin America for example.

And as disgusted as I am about reading about suicide bombings, car bombings, rocket attacks, and manipulating civilians to make the stronger opponent look bad... I still won´t support a reaction that ends up killing hundreds and potentially thousands more and causes more suffering and ruined lives than 9/11 ever did. I guess I am more pragmatic than vengeful...

Not everything Israel does is from God. So don´t support Israel in all situations just because you want to be "On God´s side". If Israel is sinning and you support their sin... then guess "who´s side" you are probably supporting.

And from what I know about Jesus, I am assuming he´s spending more time grieving over the suffering of the people in Lebonon than he is rooting Israel on to victory and rationalizing their behavior.
 
Posted by David (Member # 1) on :
 
 -


Israel is doing the right thing!!!

Even if Israel was not God's chosen people, they are still doing the right thing. The bloodthirsty terrorist must be STOPPED. PERIOD!
 
Posted by Miguel (Member # 47) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David:
 -


Israel is doing the right thing!!!

Even if Israel was not God's chosen people, they are still doing the right thing. The bloodthirsty terrorist must be STOPPED. PERIOD!

I stand with you on this one David, even do I know that He have a remnant amomg the Israelites.
 
Posted by Miguel (Member # 47) on :
 
The problem is not that, they Israelites but that they are a Democracy... “Freedom”
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
As a Christian my conviction is not to return evil for evil, or to try to defend my life by taking the life of another.

but I see and understand that their will be wars and rumors of wars till the very end of time.

Israel is fulfilling what scripture has declared would happen at the end, just as in Ezekiel, Yahweh declares that He will put "hooks" in the jaws of Russia, and lead it forth; in Zechariah 14:1, He declares that He will gather the nations to Jerusalem; in Revelation 16:16, it is again stated that the Divine influence will act as a magnet on the nations, and draw them into the place, "called in the Hebrew tongue, Armageddon."

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David:
 -


Israel is doing the right thing!!!

Even if Israel was not God's chosen people, they are still doing the right thing. The bloodthirsty terrorist must be STOPPED. PERIOD!

Ah, a flag graphic - It seems we've run out of debate and gone to animated GIF files. I salute your cunning argument sir [Wink]
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Miguel:
The problem is not that, they Israelites but that they are a Democracy... “Freedom”

Democracy isn't all that it's cracked up to be - Hamas were voted into power for example
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David:
 -


Israel is doing the right thing!!!

Even if Israel was not God's chosen people, they are still doing the right thing. The bloodthirsty terrorist must be STOPPED. PERIOD!

In an effort to stop the "Blood Thirsty Terrorists", an Israeli attack have killed 40 more civilians. Israeli bombardment kills 40 civilians How many did the Blood Thirsty Terrorists kill today?
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by becauseHElives:

Israel is fulfilling what scripture has declared would happen at the end

Maybe. Maybe not. Many Christian scholars have been 100% convinced we have been in the last generation for about 2000 years now. Up until now, they have all been proven 100% WRONG.

Be careful of supporting sin simply because this fits in to a nice packaged view of how the end times will play out.

I find it amazing how many Christians here will go on long rants about the dangers of drinking, gambling, and sex, but as the innocent life death toll approaches 1000, I see absolutely no more emotion about the death of innocent men, women, and children than a line like "Well, this is sad but this is what will happen at the end."

Go to CNN´s website and look at their photo gallery with the photos of dead innocents and look long and hard. See if you can maintain your excitement about the rapture after staring into the eyes of a mother who´s surrounding in blood and bodies of her family and the rubble of her former home which her family has spent years establishing roots. And for a second, forget about weather she is Christian, Jew, or Muslim... white, black, or arab... or weather or not her physical appearance resembles that of a "Blood Thirsty Terrorist." See and feel her pain, recognize her humanity... Then come back her and get excited about how this fits in to the end times.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
http://directory.kol-israel.com/asites/?

Iran admitted for the first time on Friday that it did indeed supply long-range Zelzal-2 missiles to Hizbullah.

Secretary-general of the "Intifada conference" Mohtashami Pur told an Iranian newspaper that Iran transferred the missiles so that they could be used to defend Lebanon, Channel 1 reported.

The extent of Iran's intimate involvement in Hizbullah attacks is starting to emerge.

According to the defense establishment, the reason Hizbullah has not fired long-range Iranian-made Fajr missiles at Israel is due to Teheran's opposition. Israel now understands that without direct orders from the ayatollahs, Hizbullah is not allowed to use Iranian missiles in attacks against Israel.

The IDF also believes that it seriously damaged the long-range rocket array in the first night of air strikes almost three weeks ago and impaired Hizbullah's ability to fire the rockets.

The longer-range Zelzal missiles, manufactured by Iran and capable of reaching Tel Aviv, have also not been fired at Israel, and the IDF believes this is because it destroyed almost two-thirds of these in the Hizbullah arsenal.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


But there is a sense in the world of a lack of proportionality. Many people question how, after two soldiers kidnapped and eight killed by Hezbollah, we are now seeing upwards of 400 dead in Lebanon.

I think that you are missing a major part. The war started not only by killing eight Israeli soldiers and abducting two but by shooting Katyusha and other rockets on the northern cities of Israel on that same morning. Indiscriminately.

Now we know that for years Hezbollah, assisted by Iran, built an infrastructure of a very significant volume in the south of Lebanon to be used against Israeli people. The most obvious way to describe it to the average British person is: can you imagine seven million British citizens sitting for 22 days ... in shelters because a terrorist organisation was shooting rockets and missiles on their heads? What would have been the British reaction to that?

I don't want now to draw comparisons (but) one could ask the question what precisely did the European forces (do) in Kosovo 10 years ago? How many innocent civilians were killed in Kosovo? We can draw on and on these comparisons. In every single case ... that we kill an uninvolved civilian in Lebanon we consider it as a failure for Israel ... The difference between us and Hezbollah is that when we kill innocent people we consider it a failure; when they kill innocent people they consider it a success. And how do you really know that 400 innocent civilians were killed? How do you know who is innocent and who is not?

This is not an army. They don't wear uniforms that distinguish them from other civilians. We didn't attack any of the Christian quarters of Beirut. We didn't attack any of the Christian residential areas in any part of Lebanon. We attacked only those areas where they had the missile launchers, where they had the command positions of Hezbollah, the storage houses, logistic centres and so on.
Austrailian News
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:
http://directory.kol-israel.com/asites/?


The extent of Iran's intimate involvement in Hizbullah attacks is starting to emerge.


That Hezbollah is an Iranian backed organisation is hardly a revelation.

Interestingly, I head a report from a journalist that works in Iran that the clerics there are getting increasingly frustrated at the lack of support from the arab nations (Iran is not an Arab nation by the way) for Hezbollah). They may make statements decrying Israel's attacks in public, but behind the scenes they are not happy with hezbollah or Iran.

An example they gave was Iran wanted to fly some 'humanitarian supplies' (wonder what was in those crates) to Lebanon and the Governments of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Jordan wouldn't let it enter their air space
[/QB][/QUOTE]

quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


We didn't attack any of the Christian quarters of Beirut. We didn't attack any of the Christian residential areas in any part of Lebanon. We attacked only those areas where they had the missile launchers, where they had the command positions of Hezbollah, the storage houses, logistic centres and so on.

I think this is a very telling quote - deliberately avoiding death and destruction in Christian areas of Lebabnon, but happily doing it to the Muslim areas. I can't imagine that Hezbollah haven't got any infrastructure in Christian areas (they've used every other trick to hide it), yet Edhut Olmert said Israel decided not to attack it. Seems to me to be more evidence of a lack of care for Arab civilians.

Freddy - I think your post brngs home a very good point.
 
Posted by Kindgo (Member # 2) on :
 
Andy, seems to me you just refuse to give the Israelies any credit at all. They are not the bad guys here. People are supernaturaly against the jews, so you just fit right in with the rest of the world, condemming Israel no matter what they do.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kindgo:
Andy, seems to me you just refuse to give the Israelies any credit at all. They are not the bad guys here. People are supernaturaly against the jews , so you just fit right in with the rest of the world , condemming Israel no matter what they do.

I count 4 times in this short post where people are lumped together in the neatly defined little boxes. I think that´s the major problem with finding the truth in any issue. I can assure you there are many "Israelis" who are against what is happening. And I know many "people" who are not supernaturaly against "the jews." "The Jews" by the way make up a whole mix of nationalities, beliefs, races even... You may be surprised to know that "People" aren´t all against "the Jews" because of a political viewpoint on an armed conflict. And "the rest of the world" is quite the broad stroke of the paintbrush as well...

Surely there are racists on both sides of the issues. (And at times, I do have to check my heart and repent of racists thoughts and actions.) Sadly, many people inadvertantly become racists because of strong loyalty to their religous beliefs...
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kindgo:
Andy, seems to me you just refuse to give the Israelies any credit at all. They are not the bad guys here. People are supernaturaly against the jews, so you just fit right in with the rest of the world, condemming Israel no matter what they do.

Hah! Seems to me you haven't read a lot of my posts. Try the fourth to last post on the second page as an example.

Perfect point freddy - Kindo (and a number of others on here), you seem to have only two boxes to put people in: "For Israel" and "Against Israel". You see yourself in the "For Israel Box", therefore anyone who disagrees with you is in the "Against Israel" box, and so therefore against Jews as well.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
From what I read in the news today, looks like another 30 or so people are dead. About 15 on each side. I really hope this ends soon.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by freddy05:
From what I read in the news today, looks like another 30 or so people are dead. About 15 on each side. I really hope this ends soon.

WON'T end till Messiah comes back and puts EVERYTHING under His dominion.

But you don't understand that.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Also all the land Israel is fighting over belongs to THEM, Yahweh DEEDED it to them.

And in the end Israel WILL UNDISPUTEDLY possess it legally and TOTALLY.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Amen Walt!!!!!!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Media Bias

The photo suggests a Palestinian so badly beaten that blood was running down his face. Publishing such an inflammatory photo had to generate extreme outrage against Israel, and the Times had to know it.

But the caption was effectively a lie.

The victim was a Jew beaten by Arabs. The Israeli policeman was defending the victim. When the Times was forced to retract, they did it grudgingly and then added another lie to the story until public outrage forced them to come clean with the real story.

The action of the Times ("All the news that's fit to print") was so outrageous that a media watchdog organization was born in response. Please go here and see "the photo that started it all" on the top right. Then read the details of how the New York Times prints 'all the news that fits.' There is no mention that anyone at the Times was punished. If the once-prestigious New York Times can be so deceptive, then we are now in a new era of extreme media dishonesty and we must be extra vigilant.

In the Arab-Israeli conflict, Israel's Arab enemies long ago developed an effective way to promote anti-Jewish terror and win the public relations battle in the process. Yasser Arafat early on employed the tactic of shooting at Jews from behind Arab women and children, who were used as shields. The Israelis were caught in a dilemma. Not to fire back meant being helpless to respond to the ongoing slaughter of Jews, but to fire back meant unavoidable loss of Arab civilians, including children. And that, with a complicit media conveniently present (by appointment?) to see and film, and later to edit. The resulting story would emphasize the retaliation over the provocation, making it seem as if Israel was deliberately targeting Arab civilians. Reality would be a product manufactured to suit.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Andy, Freddy and so many are indoctrinated by the liberal media. Israel is defending itself from a pack of rabid dogs, and the propaganda is being well used to sway too many in the west against Israel:


Propaganda revealed

This past Saturday, The New York Times and many other papers published a
picture - supplied by the Associated Press - of an angry Israeli policeman
and a badly-beaten and bloodied man, with the caption, "An Israeli
policeman and a Palestinian on the Temple Mount."
The picture can be seen at <http://www.IsraelNationalNews.com>.

Dr. Aaron Grossman, of Chicago, Ill. [6737 N Richmond Chicago, IL 60645],
sent the following letter to the Times:

"Regarding your picture on page A5 (Sept. 30) of the Israeli soldier and
the Palestinian on the Temple Mount - that Palestinian is actually my son,
Tuvia Grossman, a Jewish student from Chicago. He, and two of his friends,
were pulled from their taxicab while traveling in Jerusalem, by a mob of
Palestinian Arabs and were severely beaten and stabbed. That picture could
not have been taken on the Temple Mount because there are no gas stations
on the Temple Mount and certainly none with Hebrew lettering, like the one
clearly seen behind the Israeli soldier attempting to protect my son from
the mob."

Tuvia Grossman was on his way to the Western Wall on Friday afternoon, and
has been hospitalized ever since with head injuries and a stab wound.
He told Arutz-7 today:

"I was in a taxi on the way to the Kotel [Western Wall] and we got
stoned... [They took me out of the car and beat me and] I gave a scream,
and for a second they let go of me, and I said Shma Yisrael, because I
thought it was all over... After they let go of me, I ran - even though I
had a knife in my leg, G-d gave me the strength to run and I was able to
make it up the hill where there were soldiers by the gas station and they
took care of me. But I was being beaten for around 5 or 6 minutes with a
rock on the top of my head, and I was stabbed in the back of my leg and
kicked and punched all over my body."

"[When I saw the mis-captioned AP picture] I was extremely, extremely
upset. People see a picture of a youth and they think that it's a
Palestinian being beaten by Israelis, it changes their world view and makes
them think that it's the Israelis beating up the Arabs. I was extremely
upset. It was totally the opposite. That policeman was yelling at the
Arabs to back off, and was protecting me from them - so to change it around
and to say that he was beating me, that's just total distortion, and the
world must be notified about how this is not true - the Jews are the ones
suffering at the hands of the Arabs."

The Times published a correction today, in which it identified Tuvia
Grossman as "an American student in Israel" - not as a Jew who was beaten
by Arabs. The "correction" also noted that "Mr. Grossman was wounded" in
"Jerusalem's Old City" - although in fact it occurred in an Arab-populated
neighborhood of Jerusalem, not in the Old City. An Associated Press
spokesman told Arutz-7 that it was looking into the matter.

Dear Editor,
Even the typically biased and slanted NY Times middle east
reporting has hit a new low.
Since the Times wishes to convey the belief that the Palestinians
are all innocent lambs being tormented by an aggressive oppressor,
it can not even conceive that the wounded and injured are NOT Palestinians.

The current case in point is very personal to me. In the Saturday's Times
on page A6, the picture of the "wounded Palestinian" is, in fact,
my nephew, Tuvia Grossman, an AMERICAN Jewish student
learning in Israel.

His only crime was being Jewish.
He was not in "crossfire" but merely the target of Palestinian
lambs who stoned his cab, dragged him from the vehicle, smashed his
head with stones and stabbed him in the leg.
The Israeli soldier, whom you obviously wished to portray as victimizing
the poor, wounded Palestinian was actually saving my nephew's life.
A casual look at the background of the picture can tell anyone that
it's not the Temple Mount at all. I believe that a retraction, in a prominent
position in the paper, is necessary and an apology to the parents,
forthcoming.
Howard Gissinger
2809 Avenue S, Brooklyn, New York 11229

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Isn't it just AWESOME, that while most of the world is in fear and worry, and anxiety over the termoil in Israel, we know the FINAL outcome.

That Israel will FINALLY turn and see Y'shua as their Messiah!!!

That Yahweh will RESTORE the nation of Israel before all the world to see!!!

Hallelu Yah Hallelu Yah Hallelu Yah [clap2] [clap2] [clap2]
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Isn't it just AWESOME, that while most of the world is in fear and worry, and anxiety over the termoil in Israel, we know the FINAL outcome.

That Israel will FINALLY turn and see Y'shua as their Messiah!!!

That Yahweh will RESTORE the nation of Israel before all the world to see!!!

Hallelu Yah Hallelu Yah Hallelu Yah

[clap2] [clap2] [clap2] [clap2] [clap2]


Amen and Amen!!!!!!!!

Romans 11:
26: And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27: For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28: As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
29: For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.


Zech. 14:
7: But it shall be one day which shall be known to the LORD, not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light.
8: And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be.
9: And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one.
10: All the land shall be turned as a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem: and it shall be lifted up, and inhabited in her place, from Benjamin's gate unto the place of the first gate, unto the corner gate, and from the tower of Hananeel unto the king's winepresses.
11: And men shall dwell in it, and there shall be no more utter destruction; but Jerusalem shall be safely inhabited.
12: And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.
13: And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.
14: And Judah also shall fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the heathen round about shall be gathered together, gold, and silver, and apparel, in great abundance.
15: And so shall be the plague of the horse, of the mule, of the camel, and of the *** , and of all the beasts that shall be in these tents, as this plague.
16: And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.
17: And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.
18: And if the family of Egypt go not up, and come not, that have no rain; there shall be the plague, wherewith the LORD will smite the heathen that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.
19: This shall be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all nations that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.
20: In that day shall there be upon the bells of the horses, HOLINESS UNTO THE LORD; and the pots in the LORD's house shall be like the bowl's before the altar.
21: Yea, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah shall be holiness unto the LORD of hosts: and all they that sacrifice shall come and take of them, and seethe therein: and in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts.
 
Posted by Eduardo Grequi (Member # 3984) on :
 
AISH 2-MINUTE MOVIE
LEBANON MYTHS & FACTS
http://www.aish.com/movies/haaretz/Lebanon.asp

I thought I would post this hear. Truly I do not know where to post this!
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:


Andy, Freddy and so many are indoctrinated by the liberal media. Israel is defending itself from a pack of rabid dogs, and the propaganda is being well used to sway too many in the west against Israel:


Propaganda revealed


Caretaker, I'm geting a little fed up with your personal sideswipes at me. Either engage and debate on the issues at hand or don't.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Andy you have been indoctrinated with anti-Israel prejudice from your media, and especially from the pulpits of the Church of England. Your intial posts in this thread, showed your intrinsic bias as you reiterated the liberal catch-phrases, in sweeping condemnation:

"Israel's military has never given real regard to civilians in it's operations - their counter argument to accusations of civilian caualties has always been "they're killing our people, so we'll fight back, and if a few random innocent people are killed along the way then that's regretable". This is no way for a nation state to behave."

"Anyway, I digress. I will reiterate that the issue I see it is not Israel's right to protect itself, but the manner in which it conducts itself that is wrong. You can't just indiscriminately bomb the hell out of a country and tell the people to blame their own Government ."

"We have to deal with the current situation - there are millions of people living in extreme poverty in the occupied territories and they want the chance for self government. They do not want to become Israeli citizens, and who can blame them given the way that Israeli Arabs are treated by their own country. They also do not want to be citizens of the surrounding countries - apart from the fact that no-one actually wants them, they'll be badly treated there as well (certainly worse than in Israel). These people need a viable state before there can be any semblance of peace. Issues in the middle east keep coming back to Palestinians - without this rallying call, terrorists would find it much harder to recruit people and Israel's security would increase dramatically.

The other situation is the attacks by Hezbollah - while subjecting civilians areas to heavy bombing may be a short term tactical move, it is strategic suicide and just perpetuates the cycle of violence. Israel could claim the moral hgih ground given the constant attacks it is under and no one would deny its right to fight back - but it shoots itself in the foot every time with its own complete disregard for human life."


This is the same liberal bottom-line which the doctored photos and false reports from Lebenan seeks to reinforce.

The truth of the matter is that Israel practices great restraint in its responses, and has utilized surgical strikes rather than blanket decimation, which would more effectively clear the areas, and keep their troops much safer. It is Israel which has a high regard for human life, unlike their enemy.

Time and again Israel has backed-off and time and again the rabid dogs attack. Israel seeks to comply with the Helsinki accords, and they are inundated with homicide bombers.

They forcibly remove the settlers from the occupied territorys, and they are repeatedly attacked. When they respond to terorism which targets women and children, your liberal media attacks.

You have been indoctrinated by your culture with an intrinsic animosity towards Israel. It is the perspective which you bring to the table, and a very real reflection of the European attitude in general.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Letter To Tony Blair

Here in Britain, support for terrorism among large sections of the Muslim population is an alarming trend that must surely be cut off before it grows to unmanageable proportions. I believe you are right to call for the glorification of terrorism to become an offence, but I also believe you have been taking advice from sections within the Muslim community that are committed to an anti-Western, anti-British, and anti-Semitic view of the world.

If Hizbullah should proclaim even a partial victory, I would expect to see more young Muslims here flock to the banner of jihad, whether to fight abroad or here in the UK.

In the Middle East, force alone will not solve a deeply embedded problem.

But one thing I am certain of and that is so long as its neighbors do not recognize Israel and its right to exist, there will never be peace.

With a terrorist organization in control of Gaza and dominant in the West Bank, with a terrorist army on its borders, and with an apocalyptic Iranian president determined to wipe it from the map, Israel is faced with the greatest threat ever suffered by any nation since these islands faced the armies of the Third Reich.
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:
Andy you have been indoctrinated with anti-Israel prejudice from your media, and especially from the pulpits of the Church of England. Your intial posts in this thread, showed your intrinsic bias as you reiterated the liberal catch-phrases, in sweeping condemnation:

Why don't you come on over and actually listen to the sermons from the pulpit of CoE churches. As someone who actually listens to them, as opposed to you who selects a few articles from the internet that reinforce your current views, I can tell you the only time the middle east comes up is in prayers for the suffering across everyone there.

I love the way that you use the word 'liberal' as an insult. I regard christianity as going beyond liberal - it is a radical religion. I've always thought that it is very difficult to reconcile religion and politics if you are a conservative. Calling me a liberal is, to me, a compliment!

quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:


This is the same liberal bottom-line which the doctored photos and false reports from Lebenan seeks to reinforce.

The truth of the matter is that Israel practices great restraint in its responses, and has utilized surgical strikes rather than blanket decimation, which would more effectively clear the areas, and keep their troops much safer. It is Israel which has a high regard for human life, unlike their enemy.

I have never argued that Hizbollah is in the right, or that they are not a terrorist organisation.

However, Israel has a long history of undertaking military operations without much regard to civilians. A good example is the assasination operations against members of different terrorist organisations witin the west bank and Gaza. They get intelligence that the people they are after are driving along streets in their cars and they send helicopter gunships in to fire missles at the car - in crowded city streets. The people they are after die, but what of all the people just walking around the streets, unaware of who may be driving around. Imagine you are walking down the street and the USAF suddenly bomb a car near you because they want to get the person in the car. You've lost you arm and your daughter in the attack, but he hoh, such is life. Oh, I forgot, the difference is that they are Arab muslims and are exempt from the rules in christianity. They don't deserve the same protection everyone else gets.

As for saying they use surgical strikes, it is you that has been seduced by the pictures on TV. Cluster bombs are not surgical. Artilery shells are not surgical. Most bombs are not surgical. They will always be a few civilians killed in war - it is inevitable. But the way that Israel has gone about it's attacks is sometimes criminally negligent.

Israel is STILL bombing appartment blocks in Beiruit, saying that they are bombing Hizbollah offices. Offices???? Is is right to put so many civilians at high risk just to make Hizbollah hold meetings in a place without a proper desk????


quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:

You have been indoctrinated by your culture with an intrinsic animosity towards Israel. It is the perspective which you bring to the table, and a very real reflection of the European attitude in general.

You have no idea about European culture - I doubt you've even been here (maybe for a week's holiday). You just stick to your little web sites which reinforce you views and make you feel good wihtout having to think about the big issues that may uncomfortably clash with you're incredibly entrenched prejudiced views.

You profess christianity and closeness with Christ yet you still have not said what you think Jesus would think about this. Do you really believe he would look at the destruction being caused and say "Yes, given the balance of the situation this is unaviodable. Forget what I said about love your neighbour and turn the other cheek, what we really need are more precision guided bombs".

This is my last post in this thread - reply to my points if you want but I think we are heading towards an implementation of Godwin's law.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Why would I want to listen to sermons from the CoE when the head supports druids and homosexuality?

When the leader is Godless, what happens to the rest??
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Article


Jewish institutions and individuals have been discussing how they are affected by media reporting. Last week, the Community Security Trust, which advises and represents the Jewish community on security and anti-Semitism, asked me to tell the Church Times that:

"It frequently appears that there are no limits to the hatred and bias that can be expressed against Israel or Zionism. Anti-Semites take comfort from this hatred, and regard it as a cue to attack Jews at random here in Britain. Anti-Semitic incidents’ levels since the year 2000 have been the worst recorded in decades. The rise in incidents is appalling. This would have been unthinkable just a few years ago."

The Board of Deputies described its concern at the fact that "In 2004, there were 532 anti-Semitic incidents in the UK, which was a 42 per cent increase on the figures for 2003, which was a substantial increase on the figures for 2002."


THE BBC apologised when the Scottish hymn-writer, the Revd Dr John Bell of the Iona Community, "made two factual mistakes" about the Israeli army on the Radio 4’s Thought for the Day in February.

This was a wake-up call for the Jewish community, even though Christian aid agencies and "peace groups" have for a long time appeared to us to be attacking Israel, and ignoring attempts to hear other points of view. Individual Jews have reported experiencing violent verbal attacks during public pro-Palestinian meetings held in church buildings.

Joanne Green, a Jewish journalist, said: "Despite the BBC charter, I can’t think of any programmes that are critical of the Palestinians, despite their kangaroo courts, public hangings, threats to journalists, incitement to racial and religious hatred, corruption, and threats to destroy Israel.

"Also, as an active member of the Council of Christians and Jews, I feel betrayed by the Anglican Church. All those receptions at St James’s Palace and earnest tributes from church leaders regretting their millennia-long persecution of the Jews don’t mean anything any more. When Jews need real recognition of the danger they are in, where is the Church? Aligning themselves with those who want to wipe Israel from the face of the earth, after it was they who were responsible for the Holocaust. Forgive them, Lord, for they probably do know exactly what they do. How dare the Church lecture Jews on morality."

Many people mention the Church’s apparent silence in the face of the growing attacks on the British Jewish community. For one seasoned American journalist and Episcopalian cleric: "In Britain, there is a degree of open anti-Semitism that would be unthinkable in the USA. The C of E has been complicit in this, both by keeping silent, and by not cracking down on its members who cross the line in their advocacy of the Palestinian cause, and fall into Jew-baiting."

Canon Andrew White, CEO of the Foundation for Reconciliation in the Middle East, agrees. "Is there a new anti-Semitism?" he asks. "For Jews, disinvestment [in Israel] is not just anti-Zionism, but anti-Semitism. Christians defend their position by saying they are against Israel, not the Jews. Yet there is no call by the Christians to disinvest from countries where Christians are persecuted, or banned. Israel is viewed as the evil nation, that evil democratic nation — that just happens to be the only homeland for the Jewish people in the world.

"Now that there is an acute awareness of the dangers of Islamic fundamentalism, the Christian world needs to wake up to the fact that more Jews have been killed by Christians than by Muslims. It is no longer sufficient for the Church to blame Israel for its own anti-Semitism. The replacement theology that laid the ground for nearly two millennia of anti-Judaic polemic is on its way back. This time, it is dressed up as concern for the Palestinians."

Benjamin, a 32-year-old Jew, who stayed at my house last Shabbat, en route to an International Council of Christians and Jews convention, said: "Christians are encouraged to love their enemies. We are no longer the enemy, just irrelevant; no longer the enemy, just the object of hate and vilification."

For, as the Holocaust author Raoul Hillberg has said: "There is a straight line from ‘You have no right to live among us as Jews’ to ‘You have no right to live among us’ to ‘You have no right to live.’"

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Posted by David (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ahar:
Ah, a flag graphic - It seems we've run out of debate and gone to animated GIF files. I salute your cunning argument sir [Wink]

There is no use to debate something that is not debateable.

Israel is doing the right thing!!!

That is why they are at war. The debate is over and they have taken action because they are in the right. Period.

So I am on their side and continue to stand there.
 
Posted by Kindgo (Member # 2) on :
 
God "chose" his people in the Old Testament


Deuteronomy 7:6 For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.
 
Posted by WKUHilltopper (Member # 5472) on :
 
If'n y'all wanna blame someone, blame Lebanon. If they hadn't harbored these thugs in their country for years, then their citizens wouldn't be going thru this. They are reaping what they sow.

And what if some rogue outfit in Canada were lobbing a 1,000 missiles into our country? I guess we'd just sit by and do nothing.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by WKUHilltopper:

And what if some rogue outfit in Canada were lobbing a 1,000 missiles into our country? I guess we'd just sit by and do nothing.

NUKE 'EM I say! Toronto, Vancouver, Ottowa! After all 3000 American lives are worth more than a 100,000 homosexual-supporting-Canadians anyday!

(Sarcasm)
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David:
There is no use to debate something that is not debateable.

Well.... it is debatable... you just have chosen to ignore the counter points.

Again...

In the Bible, Israel sinned. Many times. God was against that sin. I think so far, this point is undebatable...

Israel can and probably will sin again! So don´t just take everything they do as something with God´s blessing. You may be supporting sin! Patriotism is usually more a psycological response than a locical or biblical one... When you look at two people... at the very essence of who they are, they are people. American, Canadian, British, Chinese, Saudi, Brazilian, Kenyan.... people...

That is why I´m dissappointed with nothing deeper than a patriotic flag waving response to what I feel are valid points worth debating.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Here is an indepth article:

http://www.foxven.com/s-self.html

He who fails to dress properly in freezing weather, claiming Jesus is his healer, is naive if not foolish. If God specifically tells him to go out without proper dress in a particular instance, that is a different matter. But to be presumptuous is to act foolishly. As Christians, we lock the doors of our homes. We keep our car keys in our pockets or purses, not in the ignition switch. Do these actions demonstrate lack of faith? No, they are prudent measures while living in a sinful world. Yet our confidence is ultimately in the Lord, not our prudent measures. If the government passes a law making household locks illegal, nothing really changes; our confidence ultimately is in the Lord. And under such a law, if anyone entered our house to take our property, whether a criminal or government representative, should the nature of our faith change? What if the person, either a criminal or government representative, intended us physical harm? Should our perspective change? My point is this: if our government strips us of any means to protect ourselves, whatever the motive might be, our perspective must not change. Christianity is relationship with God Almighty and is independent of the civil government under which we live. Civil government may influence the outward expression of our relationship with God, but can never take it away.

The Old Testament included a law regarding the use of deadly force against an intruder in your home, and the issue was the conditions under which the homeowner killed the intruder. Defending family and home was not the issue; use of weapons was not the issue; even killing the intruder at night was not an issue. The issue was whether the homeowner killed the intruder during the day, when he could better judge the intruder's intention and the intruder could see the homeowner was present and willing to protect his household. Displaying a weapon and being willing to use it can be and often is a deterrent. The right of the homeowner to defend his household was granted under specific conditions in the Old Testament. The New Testament does not clearly take away that right, which suggests it still exists.

Those totally opposed to weapons may cite the absence of swords or their use in the New Testament after the Day of Pentecost. Scripture also doesn't refer to sandals after the Book of Acts, but we can be certain believers continued to wear them. Swords were common in those days, so if it were wrong for believers to own or use swords, we can expect scripture to clearly say so; but it doesn't.

The New Testament includes incidents involving soldiers, which were perfect opportunities to oppose killing of any kind, but such opposition is absent. In Luke 3:14, soldiers asked John what they should do; this was a perfect opportunity for John to tell them to resign from the military or not to kill. But he responded by telling them not to extort money or accuse people falsely, and to be content with their pay. In Acts 10, we see Cornelius, a centurion in the Italian regiment, a devout and God-fearing man. An angel appeared to him in a vision, did not rebuke him for being a soldier, but instead indicated his prayers and gifts to the poor were special to God. The angel directed him to send for Peter. This lead to Peter overcoming his religious bias against non-Jews and to the first gentile believers being baptized in the Holy Spirit. Imagine: professional warriors being told to be content with their pay and being honored by God for their prayers and gifts to the poor!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


To permit murder when one could have prevented it is morally wrong. To allow a rape when one could have hindered it is an evil. To watch an act of cruelty to children without trying to intervene is morally inexcusable. In brief, not resisting evil is an evil of omission, and an evil of omission can be just as evil as an evil of commission. Any man who refuses to protect his wife and children against a violent intruder fails them morally."

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is it Biblically wrong for a policeman to use necessary force to stop a criminal?

Romans 13:
1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
2: Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
3: For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
4: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
5: Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.
6: For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
7: Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.


I spray hornet's nests and remove the threat to my family and others.

I have shot a rabid cat on my front porch, eliminating the threat to others.

I have identified a fugitive who had stolen and crashed a truck and was on the loose overnight, called-in the Sheriff and he was arrested.

I confronted a man with a twelve gauge shotgun, in the middle of the night, who was at the end of his neighbor's driveway, intending to shoot the dogs who had just killed his. I turned him around and got him back home.

I have interposed myself between three fathers who were going to beat-up a young drunk who had been shooting bottle rockets into their children's tents, had the Sheriff's Officer called to the scene, and the young man taken into custody.

I have stood with firehose in hand, and stopped the wall of flame before it could reach the mobile home.

I have called-in aid and rendered assistance to the two young drunks who rolled their dune-buggy down a rocky hill.

I have administered cpr to a dead man.

I have certified with a .357 as part of my training with the local SO, just as I have trained for 100's of hours with the fire equipment with the local volunteer department.

On many occaisons I have responded with most fervent prayers to emegency situations. Many times we have faced a wall of flame racing across the hills, and we have knocked it down before it could get by. Our faith and trust in God, and doing what was prudent and needed at the time.

Is one to seek to have necessary force utilized in the stopping of criminal activity?

Is it right to call the policeman to stop the burglar who is breaking into your neighbor's home?

Is it right to call the police to stop the thugs from assaulting the victim in the street?

Are we to pass-by the wounded man by the roadside, or are we to be the Samaritan?

Is the Samaritan to intervene to stop the victim from being attacked?

Are we to be a Ten Boom and hide the Jews from the Nazis?

Was it wrong to defeat the Nazis and to free the prison camps?

When one is yeilded to our Lord then often He will place us into a position to use our training and expertisse to render aid to another. We extriceted the young man with the broken leg, using our skill and training.

I am reminded of Seargent York:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvin_C._York

York eventually was drafted into the United States Army and assigned to the 82nd Infantry Division in 1917.

At some point he experienced a change of heart and decided he would fight, but would never be proud of his war-time exploits.

As a corporal in the 328th Infantry, in the Battle of Meuse River-Argonne Forest on 1918 October 8, he assumed command of his detachment after three other NCOs fell. While he is sometimes described as acting single-handedly, his official citation says he led seven others in a charge on an active machine-gun nest. They killed 32 German soldiers and captured 132, including four officers. (He is said to have explained this feat by saying to the enemy that they were surrounded.)

Initially, York's chain of command honored this accomplishment by awarding him the Distinguished Service Cross. France, whose forces he was directly aiding and whose territory was involved, added its Croix de Guerre and Legion of Honor. Italy and Montenegro, also allies, awarded him their Croce di Guerra and War Medal, respectively. The Distinguished Service Cross was upgraded to the Medal of Honor, which was presented to York by the commanding general of the American Expeditionary Force, John J. Pershing.

At the time of his heroics, York was in fact still a corporal. His promotion to sergeant was part of the honor that he received for his valor but resulted in his becoming known to the United States (and much of the world) as "Sergeant York".


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Self-defense for me is a generic term which describes the training and ability to neutralize an attack. The use of self-defense techniques can neutralize the attack upon others. If we love our neighbors then we are willing to assist with our skills and abilities.

For myself I have no fear, for to live is Christ, and to die is gain for to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord. My fear as I respond to the fireline, as I respond to the rollover accident, as I respond to the phyusical threat to my neighbors, is that I might fail to act suficently, might let the threat get past me and subsequent harm to others might result. The others in our department know that I will step forward, place my hand on their shoulder, and handle my share of the firehose. When dispatch calls they know that I will go out into the night to stand-in for the officer until he can arrive. When I am called at 4:00 AM, the caller knows that I will be there for them.

Failure to act, to stand aside and allow predation, when one is in a position and has the ability to act, is a facilitation of the predator.

Israel must stand and act against the predators.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Feed on this Freddy.

Genesis 15:18-21
(18) On that day Yahweh made a covenant with Abram, saying, "To your descendants I have given this land, From the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates:
(19) the Kenite and the Kenizzite and the Kadmonite
(20) and the Hittite and the Perizzite and the Rephaim
(21) and the Amorite and the Canaanite and the Girgashite and the Jebusite."


Joshua 1:1-6
(1) Now it came about after the death of Moses the servant of Yahweh, that the LORD spoke to Joshua the son of Nun, Moses' servant, saying,
(2) "Moses My servant is dead; now therefore arise, cross this Jordan, you and all this people, to the land which I am giving to them, to the sons of Israel.
(3) "Every place on which the sole of your foot treads, I have given it to you, just as I spoke to Moses.
(4) "From the wilderness and this Lebanon, even as far as the great river, the river Euphrates, all the land of the Hittites, and as far as the Great Sea toward the setting of the sun will be your territory.
(5) "No man will be able to stand before you all the days of your life. Just as I have been with Moses, I will be with you; I will not fail you or forsake you.
(6) "Be strong and courageous, for you shall give this people possession of the land which I swore to their fathers to give them.


Freddy and ahar: with Genesis 15:18 and Joshua 1:4 in mind, the land Yahweh gave to Israel included everything from the Nile river in Egypt to Lebanon (North to South) and everything from the Mediterranean Sea to the Euphrates River (West to East).

So, what land has Yahwe stated belongs to Israel?

All of the land modern Israel currently possesses, plus all of the land of the Palestinians (the West Bank and Gaza), plus some of Egypt and Syria, plus all of Jordan, plus some of Saudi Arabia and Iraq.


IF you belive Yahweh is the Creator, and IF you belive Scripture, that there can be NO debating that Israel has TOTAL right to ALL that land.


Has Israel sinned - YUP YUP - and one of thoses sins is their FAILURE to take and occupy the land Yahweh indisputably deeded to them.

And they have been reaping what that have sown in their failures.

But K N O W this, Yahweh WILL fullfill His promise - Israel WILL get ALL the land given to them by the Creator who has the UNQUESTIONABLE right to do so.


If you have ANY problem with any of that, then your problem is with Yahweh, and you need to repent of it.

The unrightful occupiers of the land that TRUELY and RIGHTFULLY belongs to Israel are ENEMIES of Yahweh, and to side and defend them is to aline yourself as an ENEMY of Yahweh.

That is NOT a wise thing to do.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
Wparr- I definately appreciate your passion on the issues!

If we were in year 300BC, perhaps I would agree with you. But we are living after the time of Christ. After the time in which "the rules changed". Most people on the board seem to agree that we can´t take the OT as literal in the sense of following all the commands. (ie stoning people to death or condemning people for wearing clothes with two types of fabric, etc...) I view presant day action through the lens of Christ´s love first. And in the situation in the middle east and the response of Israel, I will not simply give them a blank check of support to take the land outlined in the old testement and killing innocents along the way.

I wonder what American´s response would be if Native Americans amassed power and started taking back that which their people owned for many years...
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Yahweh never promised this land to the Indians, so that comparison is meaningless.

Yahweh is the SAME as He was 3000 years ago.

His Covenant STILL stands.

Israel is STILL His chosen Nation and He WILL restore it.

The Jewish are STILL His chosen people (even though most are rejecting Him, but that WILL change)

The enemies of Israel are STILL Yahweh's enemies - are you are lining up with Yahweh's enemies.


The Church has NOT replaced Israel - that is a heritical false teaching - we were added; grafted in (read Romans 10&11)

Not as much has changed between OT and NT as you would like to think.
The NT explains and FULLFILLS the OT - not replaces it.
But thats for a different post.

Repent of siding with Yahweh's enemies before it's to late.
Get on the WINNING side of the war between good (Yahweh)and evil (satan and the world)
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by wparr:
Yahweh never promised this land to the Indians, so that comparison is meaningless.

The point of the comparison is to try to help you try to understand a bit more about what real people are going through in the middle east. I don´t know if its simply that you have a hard heart, or if its that your politics trump the message of compassion Jesus had, or what... but I do know the attitude that you have towards to poor and suffering is not Christ.

Think about how you would feel if the government tried to take a house from you for a freeway project. Real people are having their lives destroyed, without compensation, by a foreign government. I can´t rejoice in that because it fits into the "gameplan" of one view of how the end times will play out.

Perhaps one day God will give the land to Israel by peaceful means. I can´t imangine that at this point in history, but I wouldn´t put it past God.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by freddy05:
The point of the comparison is to try to help you try to understand a bit more about what real people are going through in the middle east. I don´t know if its simply that you have a hard heart, or if its that your politics trump the message of compassion Jesus had, or what... but I do know the attitude that you have towards to poor and suffering is not Christ.

Think about how you would feel if the government tried to take a house from you for a freeway project. Real people are having their lives destroyed, without compensation, by a foreign government. I can´t rejoice in that because it fits into the "gameplan" of one view of how the end times will play out.

You have NO IDEA of my attitude to the poor and suffering.

I DO have compassion, but the tempral MUST be tied to the eternal or it's wasted.

I've voluntered at a truck stop chapel for going on 4 years now - and I minister to the homeless and drunks there in the area.

I've been to Israel twice (not tourist)
To Ivory Coast twice and Haiti, so I've SEEN real suffering.
With Haiti, they root of the problem there is demonic as voodoo is well practiced and has a major stronhold.
Giving food WITHOUT trying to break the demonic strongholds is POINTLESS.


quote:
Originally posted by freddy05:

Perhaps one day God will give the land to Israel by peaceful means. I can´t imangine that at this point in history, but I wouldn´t put it past God.

Do you even read Scripture??

If you did, you would realize THAT won't happen

When Yahweh delivers the land back to Israel it's going to be BLOODY with MAJOR suffering.

But in the end Yahweh's enemies will be CRUSHED.

My focus is to get people on the RIGHT team before it's TOO LATE.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by wparr:
You have NO IDEA of my attitude to the poor and suffering.

I DO have compassion, but the tempral MUST be tied to the eternal or it's wasted.

I've voluntered at a truck stop chapel for going on 4 years now - and I minister to the homeless and drunks there in the area.

I've been to Israel twice (not tourist)
To Ivory Coast twice and Haiti, so I've SEEN real suffering.
With Haiti, they root of the problem there is demonic as voodoo is well practiced and has a major stronhold.
Giving food WITHOUT trying to break the demonic strongholds is POINTLESS.

It sounds like when you´ve traveled, you´ve done so with your mind made up. Someone who is too closed minded cannot be moved even by seeing real suffering. It sounds like when you´ve seen suffering, you simply place in its place in your view of the great cosmic sporting event.

And you have made your attitude towards the poor and suffering VERY clear. And that is why I think you do have some business with God to take care of. (ie repentance)

And from pragmatic experience, I can tell you that shoving religion down the throats of the poor and suffering will often turn more people away from God than you actually end up helping. If I was a non-Christian, and all the Christians I met had your attitude towards helping the poor, I would run as far away from Christ as posssible. Fortunately, the people I knew in my life that were Christians lived out compassion and love towards all people with no strings attached. That is what drew me in.

I can guarantee you, that giving food (without bible) to starving person means a lot to the starving person.
 
Posted by Eduardo Grequi (Member # 3984) on :
 
You know, I dislike wars immensely, but it seems to me, when your choices are either the sea or an Arabian sword, there are not too many choices, and that is exactly what has confronted Israel since 1948. The world's media is not just of the left and for dictatorships, they are also afraid of the Hezbullahs of the world. Everything is about the Lebanese now, all the pictures are about bloody Lebanese people. I do feel immensely for them, especially the innocent who might not have been a participator on the hiding of arms and Hezbullah men. Those that hide them, I am sorry but they are as guilty as those shooting rockets. For six years they have been entrenching in Lebanon, and the Shias of Lebanon have allowed it to happen. So, if the world press would think a bit in an intelligent way, when they show pictures, they should say--This is what happens to people who hide terrorists. But no, its the poor defenseless people. They are not defenseless. Again I ask, why were so many women and children dying? Must have been planned to place them in harms way. They needed to show that the Israelis were killing their innocent women and children to get sympathizers, especially the Arab world for adherence, and for the Europeans to convince them a bit more. So, they got their opportunity with the worlds media. The media should be plain. They should tell them to come out and fight instead of hiding under the skirts of women or among children. I have no respect whatsoever for the media, neither has most of the American people according to the 'Polls". Why are the "media" entrenched in Lebanon? They want to get the Pulitzer prize. That is the major reason they are there for and risking limb. Of course, all networks are competing for prime time killing, to satiate the thirst of the new Roman audience.
People seem to want to see blood and guts splashed all over their TV screen. I am telling you, we should all be sending messages to the media networks and give them our opinion.
First there were the Jews, then the Christians, then they came for our neighbor and we said nothing, then they came for us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And now its not the Otto Turks, no, now are those so full of even more hate for what we have and don't have, they kill, yes, they aim at innocent civilians.
I hope Israel goes at it now and ends it soon, otherwise it will just get too complicated. It has already taking too long. I know its hard to find the enemy, after all they hide without an army, amongst civilians. What cowards!
MariaV


I agree with Maria my Jewish sister on this post!

Shalom,

Eduardo


__._,_.___
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by freddy05:

I can guarantee you, that giving food (without bible) to starving person means a lot to the starving person.

And I can guarantee that if a "christian" feeds a starving person and DOESN'T care about the eternal condition of their soul that are LACKING Christ compassion.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
I won't begin to try to defend my level of compassion to you freddy because it would be pointless, you wouldn't listen or believe anyway.

If you think I'm saying don't feed poor or anything like that they you're not hearing what I'm saying.

Good works, independant of God, from an ETERNAL perspective is meaningless.

What does it benifit if a mormon feeds a hungry person if both end up in hell?

Answer that.

It's just your perspective is now and earthly, while mine is more kingdomly and eternal.

Meeting the physical needs has to be combined with the eternal needs if it's going to have any meaning.

Mother Theresa did a lot of "good" works, but she lost sight of the eternal and wasn't concerned about letting hindus and such know about Jesus, so WHAT does that accomplish?


Did you, in reading Scripture notice that Jesus DIDN'T heal all He came across?

He most definately hade the ability didn't He?

Was He lacking in compassion?

So I ask you why didn't He?
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
Wparr- looks like we´ve been taking over this thread on the compassion issue. Which I still do think is related insofar as having compassion for the suffer of those caught in the middle. (mainly arabs from Lebanon) I started a new thread to continue that discussion so we can get back to Israel here.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
http://directory.kol-israel.com/asites/?

European carriers canceled flights Thursday to Britain, where airports were experiencing massive delays after authorities thwarted a terrorist plot to blow up aircraft in flight.

Heathrow airport, the busiest airport in Europe, was closed to most European flights Thursday morning following a heightened terrorist alert, officials said. Flights from Tel Aviv to the UK were also cancelled, sources said.

All airlines stopped flights Thursday from Brussels to Heathrow, which was closed until 2 p.m. (1200GMT).

"For now, all flights to London Heathrow have been canceled," a Brussels international Airport official said, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with standing policy. He did not elaborate.

British police said they had arrested 21 people in connection with the plot which was "intended to be mass murder on an unimaginable scale," a senior official said Thursday.

Deputy Commissioner Paul Stephenson said the 21 had been arrested in London, its suburbs and in Birimingham, and that searches continued in a number of locations.

German carrier Lufthansa said its morning and early afternoon flights were canceled because of "logistical and not security" reasons. No other Lufthansa flights were affected.

Spain's Iberia said it had canceled four flights to Britain in total, and Italian carrier Alitalia stopped six flights through London _ four linking the city with Rome and two with Milan. Alitalia said it would decide later Thursday whether to continue the cancelations.

Heathrow's block on incoming traffic applied to flights of three hours or less, an airport spokesman said on condition of anonymity. Congestion was building up rapidly at the airport as authorities enforced strict new regulations banning most hand baggage.

Britain's Home Secretary John Reid said the alleged plot was significant and that terrorists aimed to "bring down a number of aircraft through mid-flight explosions, causing a considerable loss of life."

Police arrested a number of people in London after a major covert counterterrorism operation that had lasted several months, but did not immediately say how many.

The US government responded by raising its threat assessment to the highest level for commercial flights from Britain to the United States early Thursday.

"We believe that these arrests (in London) have significantly disrupted the threat, but we cannot be sure that the threat has been entirely eliminated or the plot completely thwarted," said US Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.

Passengers faced delays as tighter security was hastily enforced at the country's airports and additional measures were put in place for all flights, and British Airways said some flights were likely to be canceled. Laptop computers, mobile phones, iPods, and remote controls were among the items banned from being carried on board.

"The police believe the alleged plot was a very significant one indeed," Reid said.

"At 2 a.m. this morning the Joint Terrorism Analysis Center raised the UK threat state to its highest level - critical."

The 'critical' level means authorities believed an imminent terrorist attack was likely.

Prime Minister Tony Blair, vacationing in the Caribbean, had brief US President George W. Bush on the situation overnight, Blair's office said.

The Department of Transport advised all passengers that they would not be permitted to carry any hand baggage on board any aircraft departing from any airport in the country.

Prescription medicines were OK; so were eyeglasses but not their cases, the department said. Contact lenses could be taken aboard in their cases, but bottles of solution were banned.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
web page

“After one month of war against Lebanon's resistance, Israelis are the absolute losers and Hizbullah is the absolute winner of the war,” Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamida-Reza Asefi said Sunday. “The occupiers of Jerusalem failed, despite their military, economic, intelligence and diplomatic backings.”

The Iranian official said the Islamic Republic of Iran is “very pleased” with the ceasefire, according to state-run Iranian news agency IRNA. He warned, though, that attacks on Israel would continue as long as “occupation lingers.” He declined to outline whether occupation included retaining sovereignty in regions such as the Galilee – which Hizbullah chief Hassan Nasrallah has termed “settlements” in his wartime addresses. "Let us not forget that as long as there is occupation there is resistance," he added.

Hizbullah central council member Ahmed Barakat told Qatari newspaper al-Watan Sunday, "Today Arab and Muslim society is reasonably certain that the defeat of Israel is possible, and that countdown to the disappearance of the Zionist entity in the region has begun… If a mere organization succeeded in defeating Israel, why would Arab nations not succeed in doing so if they allied? Many Arabs and Muslims viewed Israel in a fictional way and the resistance has succeeded in changing this."

Barakat boasted that none of Hizbullah’s leadership were injured, and that the group still possesses thousands of rockets and other “surprises” for use in the days following the implementation of the UN ceasefire. He added that the remaining missiles and weapons allow Hizbullah to strike Israel from afar and do not require the group to be near Israel’s border.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
Amen David:


quote:
There is no use to debate something that is not debateable.

Israel is doing the right thing!!!

That is why they are at war. The debate is over and they have taken action because they are in the right. Period.

So I am on their side and continue to stand there.

 -
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
God bless each of my Brothers and Sisters who honor Israel in their hearts and prayers. They say a picture is worth a thousand words and in this case many more:


 -
 
Posted by David (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ahar:
quote:
Originally posted by David:
But they have not, so you are worrying about something that has not happened.

You could say that God may say He really is not God. But that don't make it true.

I used that as an example of a line that you might draw in critism of Israel. Either Israel is immune to critism or it is not - if not then the decision is where you draw the line and how you balance critism of what might be called sinful actions, with risking 'cursing' Israel as described in Genesis.

My feeling is that Israel has crossed that line and deserves to be rebuked for some of its actions - clearly everyone else posting in the tread doesn't!

My feeling is that Israel has NOT crossed that line
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David:
My feeling is that Israel has NOT crossed that line

Glad you support cluster bombs in civilian areas.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Hey freddy, if you support or defend Islam in ANY way, you are supporting satan.

Islam is God's ENEMY which is why they want to kill ALL Jews.

If you are the christian you claim to be, HOW can you support or defend God's enemies???

Islam is a religion born of satan's lies and deceptions, and ALL who practice and follow it are at ODDS with God.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
Wparr, let me see if I understand you then... on this issue, you see supporting Israel´s use of cluster bombs in civilian is Christlike?

Is it not at all possible that Israel could be doing some wrong? (please note: accusing Israel of wrong doing in no way means one has to support Islam. Some issues are not as black and white as you like to think...)
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
First get the WHOLE story:

Israel dropped leaflets BEFORE hand warning the population.

I'm NOT saying they are Christ like, because they are lost.

But they are STILL Yahweh's chosen people.

And on the secular side (which is the angle your debatng from) The Muslims want to COMPLETELY wipe out Israel and all jews (and YOU TOO by the way)
So how do you defend or make peace with an evilness like that?

ALL that land belongs to Israel - Yahweh GAVE it to them - they have the RIGHT to it.

Are you going to go AGAINST Yahweh's will on this issue?

That's MIGHTY dangerous ground to be on iff you do.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
When it comes to Islam - there is NO "grey" area.

They are COMPLETELY in the black.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by wparr:
Israel dropped leaflets BEFORE hand warning the population.

Your ignorance on these issues is amazing. You expect a family that earns less per day than you can make in 20 minutes at McDonalds to simply pack up and leave? You don´t have to answer that, more of a rhetorical question.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by wparr:
When it comes to Islam - there is NO "grey" area.

They are COMPLETELY in the black.

And therefore any means of killing them is ok, including cluster bombs in residential areas? Did those leaflets Israel dropped also mention that cluster bombs would still be in their neighborhoods once the fighting was over?

One can be against Israel´s actions in a specific instance without supporting Islam.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Two direct questions freddy

Is Islam an evil religion?

Who started the aggresions?

I'm NOT ignorant - I've been to Israel twice (not as a tourist) have you been there?
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
And also freddy WHY aren't you as condeming of the terrorists as you are on the people fighting back?

ALL I see you doing is attacking Israel.

When someone is trying to commit genocide on your country and people (and that's what Islam IS trying to do) don't you have the RIGHT to defend yourselves with whatever it takes?
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
Your ignorance on the situation in southern lebanon is pure ignorance. You really think the leaflets justify the cluster bombs...

Yes I have been to Israel. I have visited with an open mind the west bank, jordan, and egypt as well. I count some jews and some arabs in the region as personal friends. I have seen first hand the destruction caused by Israel, as well as Israeli families torn apart by terrorism.

I spend more time condeming israel than arab terrorists on these boards because I see many ignorant comments about israel. I don´t see people making ignorant comments supporting terror. If people were, I would be debating them and I would probably appear very pro-israel.

Who started the aggression? Personally, I don´t think that really matters at this point... but I guess God did by commanding a group of people into an occupied land... or maybe the British with their actions post WW2... or the Israelis in the 6 day war... but the arabs were threatening so they did... but the Israelis did by holding land in the north... but Hezbollah did by capturing 2 Israeli soldiers...

Is Islam EVIL? Depends what you mean I suppose. If you mean anything that is not going to heaven, then I suppose. If you are talking about terrorist who kill in the name of islam, yes. If you are talking about the camel hearder that saved me in the sahara desert (true story) then no.

Do you think blowing up kids via neglagence is EVIL? Do you think God would support that? Does it make a difference if they are evil muslim kids?
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
You, as a typical liberal you attack Israel.

What do you think the leaders is Israel ought to do to people who will stop at NOTHING to totally wipe them out.

And DON'T suggest peace negotiations, they have not nor WILL NOT work.

It's the MUSLIMS that send suicide bombers to PURPOSEFULLY target innocent civiilians.

The Muslims are the INITIATORS, and Israel RESPONDS.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
freddy, do you know HOW this is all going to end?

Yahweh HIMSELF will TOTALLY wipe out the muslims and Israel will be VICTORIOUS.

I know the begining, and I know the end, so as it all works out I know WHICH side to be on.
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Romans 11:1-36
(1) I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? May it never be! For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
(2) God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew. Or do you not know what the Scripture says in the passage about Elijah, how he pleads with God against Israel?
(3) "Lord, THEY HAVE KILLED YOUR PROPHETS, THEY HAVE TORN DOWN YOUR ALTARS, AND I ALONE AM LEFT, AND THEY ARE SEEKING MY LIFE."
(4) But what is the divine response to him? "I HAVE KEPT for Myself SEVEN THOUSAND MEN WHO HAVE NOT BOWED THE KNEE TO BAAL."
(5) In the same way then, there has also come to be at the present time a remnant according to God's gracious choice.
(6) But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace.
(7) What then? What Israel is seeking, it has not obtained, but those who were chosen obtained it, and the rest were hardened;
(8) just as it is written, "GOD GAVE THEM A SPIRIT OF STUPOR, EYES TO SEE NOT AND EARS TO HEAR NOT, DOWN TO THIS VERY DAY."
(9) And David says, "LET THEIR TABLE BECOME A SNARE AND A TRAP, AND A STUMBLING BLOCK AND A RETRIBUTION TO THEM.
(10) "LET THEIR EYES BE DARKENED TO SEE NOT, AND BEND THEIR BACKS FOREVER."
(11) I say then, they did not stumble so as to fall, did they? May it never be! But by their transgression salvation has come to the Gentiles, to make them jealous.
(12) Now if their transgression is riches for the world and their failure is riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their fulfillment be!
(13) But I am speaking to you who are Gentiles. Inasmuch then as I am an apostle of Gentiles, I magnify my ministry,
(14) if somehow I might move to jealousy my fellow countrymen and save some of them.
(15) For if their rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead?
(16) If the first piece of dough is holy, the lump is also; and if the root is holy, the branches are too.
(17) But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the rich root of the olive tree,
(18) do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you.
(19) You will say then, "Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in."
(20) Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear;
(21) for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either.
(22) Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God's kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off.
(23) And they also, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again.
(24) For if you were cut off from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and were grafted contrary to nature into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these who are the natural branches be grafted into their own olive tree?
(25) For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery--so that you will not be wise in your own estimation--that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in;
(26) and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, "THE DELIVERER WILL COME FROM ZION, HE WILL REMOVE UNGODLINESS FROM JACOB."
(27) "THIS IS MY COVENANT WITH THEM, WHEN I TAKE AWAY THEIR SINS."
(28) From the standpoint of the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but from the standpoint of God's choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers;
(29) for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
(30) For just as you once were disobedient to God, but now have been shown mercy because of their disobedience,
(31) so these also now have been disobedient, that because of the mercy shown to you they also may now be shown mercy.
(32) For God has shut up all in disobedience so that He may show mercy to all.
(33) Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways!
(34) For WHO HAS KNOWN THE MIND OF THE LORD, OR WHO BECAME HIS COUNSELOR?
(35) Or WHO HAS FIRST GIVEN TO HIM THAT IT MIGHT BE PAID BACK TO HIM AGAIN?
(36) For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever. Amen.


Do you really grasp what Yahweh is saying here?
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
Genesis 12:1-3
(1) Now the LORD said to Abram, "Go forth from your country, And from your relatives And from your father's house, To the land which I will show you;
(2) And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing;
(3) And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed."
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
Hmm, I said that I wouldn't post again in this thread, but I can't ignore the last part:

You have posted your own answer wparr

Israel IS capable of sinning, as are we all. If you could go and see the horrendous damage cluster munitions do rather than sitting in your nice safe seat in the US and watching the Fox News sanitised version you would fall on your knees and weep at the horror of it. Cluster bombs are a weapon of terror, designed to leave lethal bomblets lying over a wide area and their effect particularly hits children.

You seem unable to grasp the concept of being able to critise the conduct of Israel while recognising the right to self defence and condemning the terrorists.

Why do you find this concept so difficult to grasp?

Critising Israel's actions is not an act of condemning the country - if a christian brother or sister does something wrong do you say something to them or ignore it? The same concept applies to Israel - if they do something wrong we are duty bound to condemn the action - this does not mean we are condemning the country.

I have plenty of things to repent for, but it seems from your last few posts Wparr, you have at least one today as well.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
God bless you Walt;

The Duo of deception will look for any angle to attack and condemn Israel.

This is the reality which the liberals will continue to ignore:

 -

 -
Children wearing military camouflage uniforms and carrying Hezbollah flags in a parade. The educational institutions are raising the younger generation on the principles of violence and hatred for Israel.
Hizbullah´s Fundraising Network
 
Posted by wparr (Member # 891) on :
 
ahar:

Israel is RESPONDING to Islamists who INITIATE genocidal terror.

WHERE is your comdemnation of the EVIL Islamists initiators of terror??

You have NO NO NO credibility critisizing Israel if you don't condem the TRUE evil in the battle of Israel's survival.

NO ONE here has said Israel doesn't sin.

In fact this whole conflict is because of sin - Abraham's sin of trying to bring about Yahweh's promise in the flesh.

They are reaping now what Abraham sowed.


Yahweh IS in control thru all this, and will bring Israel into His arms as they will FINALLY reconize Y'shua as Messiah. [clap2] [clap2] [clap2]

And I don't watch Fox news (your liberal blinding bias is showing thru) because I don't get any tv programing.
I get my news from multiple internet sites, and from Scripture (which tells me WHICH side is God's and which side is satan's - I PRAY you can discern that)
 
Posted by ahar (Member # 5810) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by wparr:

WHERE is your comdemnation of the EVIL Islamists initiators of terror??

All the way through my posts in this thread actually. The main focus of my posts is on the actions of Israel as that was the topic for the thread, not a thread to post in ever greater and more flowery language that what Hezbollah do is evil. Start one on that topic and I'll post on that as well.

quote:
Originally posted by wparr:

You have NO NO NO credibility critisizing Israel if you don't condem the TRUE evil in the battle of Israel's survival.

I have condemned Hezbollah in most of my posts throughout this thread - have a read of them if you have time.

quote:
Originally posted by wparr:

NO ONE here has said Israel doesn't sin.

In fact this whole conflict is because of sin - Abraham's sin of trying to bring about Yahweh's promise in the flesh.

They are reaping now what Abraham sowed.

Then why do you not condemn this sin? Sin is sin is sin.


quote:
Originally posted by wparr:


And I don't watch Fox news (your liberal blinding bias is showing thru) because I don't get any tv programing.

Yes, it was a bit of a cheap shot and I apologise.

Yet again though, you call me a liberal as an insult but it is not such thing - liberalism has a far greater link with christianity than conservatism. However, that's out of scope of this thread - I'll start one in the political forum to cover it.
 
Posted by yahsway (Member # 3738) on :
 
Well this ought to interesting. Can we also discuss how "liberal" the muslim nations are?
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by yahsway:
Well this ought to interesting. Can we also discuss how "liberal" the muslim nations are?

That´s a very interesting point. The muslim nations with the craziest laws are the most Conservative countries on earth.
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:
God bless you Walt;

The Duo of deception will look for any angle to attack and condemn Israel.

This is the reality which the liberals will continue to ignore:

 -


The Duo of Deception! I like that! [Smile]

I understand how one could agree with the rendition your cartoon of the Arab and Israel soldiers with baby carriages portrays...

However, thinking a bit more deeply, and putting things into a historical context... The reasons the arab armies have resorted to such tactics has more to do with economics and war tactics than God vs Satan. Historically, anytime an army is greatly outmatched they resort to similar tactics. Look at Colombia specifically, or any conflict throughout the world where one side was outmatched by impossible odds.

Of course this doesn´t fit in to your nice little boxed view of the world, so you will reject it.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Actually Freddy it would be more accurate if the baby had dynamite strapped on and it was being rolled towards the Israeli.
 
Posted by Caretaker (Member # 36) on :
 
Islamic Schools Indoctrination in Hate

School Books

1. Israel does not appear on any maps of the world in the new PA textbooks, while maps of Israel replace the name Israel with "Palestine" in all of the new Palestinian Authority school books.

2. The new Palestinian school books "annex" sites in Israel to Palestine. "Haifa is a Palestinian seaport." (Lughatuna Al-Jamila [Our Beautiful Language] Vol. 2, 5th grade textbook, p. 86) "Galilee, Nazareth and Beit She'an are regions in Palestine." (Al-Iqtisad Al-Manzili [Home Economy], 10th grade textbook, pp. 36-37)

3. The new Palestinian school books mention Israel only as an enemy, in reference to "occupation of lands" in 1948 and 1967: "There is no doubt that the Israeli occupation has a negative impact on [Palestinian] agriculture and its export." (Lughatuna Al-Jamila [Our Beautiful Language] Vol. 1, 10th grade textbook, p. 102)

4. The new Palestinian school books present Zionism only as an enemy movement: "The Palestinian people are under an oppressive siege, limiting their movement and way of life." (Al-Tarbiyah Al-Islamiyyah [Islamic Education], Vol. 1, 5th grade textbook, p. 49) Accusation against settlements (from 1948!) of damaging water sources, as in "the influence of settlement on sources of water in Palestine." (Ulum Al-Sihha Wal-B'ia [Health and Environmental Sciences], 10th grade textbook, p. 122) "The Palestinian family has problems...stemming from the occupation... it loses father, mother or son to death or imprisonment... endures the difficulties of life..." (Al-Tarbiyah Al-Wataniyya [National Education], 5th grade textbook, p. 23)

5. The new Palestinian school books make the false claim that an "extremist Zionist" set fire to the Al-Aqsa Mosque in 1969 (Tarikh Al-'Alam Al-Hadith Wal-Mu'asir [History of the New Modern World], 10th grade textbook, p. 106), when it was really a mentally unstable fundamentalist Christian Australian.

6. The new Palestinian school books teach that the First Zionist Congress at Basel fostered the Zionist State based on a secret decision of what came came to be known as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. (Tarikh Al-'Alam Al-Hadith Wal-Mu'asir [History of the New Modern World], 10th grade textbook, pp. 60-64)

7. The new Palestinian school books teach that the only ancient inhabitants of Israel were Arabs, ignoring any ancient Jewish presence: "Concentrated... in the land of Al-Sham [Greater Syria]... was the culture of the Canaanite and Aramaic peoples who migrated there from the Arab peninsula." (Tarikh al-Hadarat Al-Qadima [History of Ancient Civilizations], 5th grade textbook, Foreword)

8. The new Palestinian school books teach that Palestinians must use war and violence - especially martyrdom - to accomplish their goals: The heroic mother, "who incessantly presents one sacrifice [fida'] after another." (Lughatuna Al-Jamila [Our Beautiful Language], Vol 2, 5th grade textbook, p. 31) The warrior goes to war faced with one of the good options: victory or martyrdom in battle for the sake of Allah. (Ibid. Vol. 1, 5th grade textbook, p. 70). "Allah gave the people of this land [Al-Sham and Palestine] an important task: they must stand on the forefront of the Muslim campaign against their enemies, and only if they fulfill their duty to their religion, nation, and land will they be rewarded as stated in the scriptures." (Al-Tarbiya Al-Islamiyyah (Islamic Education), Vol 2, 10th grade textbook, p. 50)

9. The new Palestinian school books feature children with names such as Jihad (holy war) and Nidal (struggle). (Tarikh Al-Hadarat Al-Qadima [History of Ancient Civilizations], 5th grade textbook, p.6)

10. The new Palestinian school books stress the importance of "return" of refugees to all of Palestine - by violence: "The wrong must be made right by returning them to their homes: we returned to the homeland after a long absence." (Lughatuna Al-Jamila [Our Beautiful Language], Vol 2, 5th grade textbook, p. 43) "Returning to the homes, the plains and the mountains, under the banners of glory, jihad [holy war] and struggle." (Lughatuna Al-Jamila [Our Beautiful Language], Vol 1, 5th grade textbook, p.88)
 
Posted by helpforhomeschoolers (Member # 15) on :
 
quote:
The reasons the arab armies have resorted to such tactics has more to do with economics and war tactics than God vs Satan. Historically, anytime an army is greatly outmatched they resort to similar tactics. Look at Colombia specifically, or any conflict throughout the world where one side was outmatched by impossible odds.

Of course this doesn´t fit in to your nice little boxed view of the world, so you will reject it.

It does not fit with the Bible's view either... all things have to do with GOd vs Satan:

Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
 -  -
 
Posted by freddy05 (Member # 5854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Caretaker:
Actually Freddy it would be more accurate if the baby had dynamite strapped on and it was being rolled towards the Israeli.

Still haven´t addressed my point. Historically armies that are heavily outmatched resort to unorthadox (and often disgusting) tactics.
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0