This is topic The Importance of Correct Theology in forum Bible Topics & Study at Christian Message Boards.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://thechristianbbs.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=005435

Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
I have spent several hours reading the Posts and Replies of many of my brothers and sisters in Christ on this very good Christian Message Board.

In doing so, I have been encouraged by the faith I see coming from the members.
I also see the importance to the joy of all those who believe unto salvation that we get our theology right.

Despite what you and I may think, the Truth of God's Word stands as a beacon of light. We must continue to dig deep into the Bible in order to get proper understanding.

Psalm 119:105, "Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path."

Does it matter if everyone agrees that Jesus died only for the elect of God and not for ALL men?

I believe it does matter. It matters greatly.

Our joy is increased beyond measure in a thankful heart that knows that it deserved nothing from God but His terrible wrath and condemnation to eternal darkness and torment.

God wrote His Letter (the Bible) to us and commanded us to get understanding:

Proverbs 16:16, "How much better to get wisdom than gold!
To get understanding is to be chosen rather than silver."

Ephesians 1:17-19, "that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you a spirit of wisdom and of revelation in the knowledge of him,
having the eyes of your hearts enlightened, that you may know what is the hope to which he has called you, what are the riches of his glorious inheritance in the saints..."

I think that all of us who believe the Gospel take these words seriously and that's why I believe that the theology we all hold must be in accordance with the Truth of the Bible and not just our own feeling about the way we think things ought to be.

1) Therefore, I submit for your serious consideration that Universal Atonement (that Jesus died for all men) is an error, and is not found in the Bible.

2) Limited Atonement (Jesus dying only for the Elect of the Father) is the Truth from the Bible.
(John, Ch. 17 will supply ample proof. Other Scriptures that reveal this same truth are found in Jesus' words in Matthew 24:22,24,31 and in Mark 13:20,22,27 and in Romans 8:33 and in Romans 11:7
and in 2 Timothy 2:10 and in Titus 1:1.)

Jesus said in John 15:11, "These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full."

May the Truth of His joy be in all of us and may our joy be full!

waynemlj
 
Posted by scythewieldor (Member # 6830) on :
 
Dear friend,
Concerning the question of those for whom Jesus died, the answer is "Jesus died for two nations one of which is already together. The other is being gathered.
quote:
John 11:49 And one of them, named Caiaphas, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know nothing at all,
50 Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
51 And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;
52 And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad.
53 Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death.
54 Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim, and there continued with his disciples.

John 3:16 says God loved the kosmos. As he gives Abraham's seed possession of the gates of their enemies, they will run the kosmos as men who are taught of the Lord. The abundant declarations of the agricultural benefits of that possession are amazing.
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi Waynemlj,
I believe that the most reliable way to arrive at credible conclusions is to compare scripture to scripture. I do think that you would agree with that. When we have christians with opposing views we need to make sure that both sides are using scripture as thier check and balance. If someone chooses to use a private interpretation as their check and balance that is how man-made paradoxes are birthed. I have noticed though that there is a degree of difficulty at times when discussing things that pertain to the question of how God exercises His sovereignty. People just need to be patient with each other on those more difficult subjects. I think people on this site have managed well being able to express their thoughts without causing divisions in the unity of the faith.

When we can ,for example, as a body, see the importance of our obedience without having to argue about the "theological" importance of it in relation to salvation, then I believe that we are headed in the right direction. When we can take verses from out of scripture that seem to contradict and show how they dont contradict, I do believe we are moving in the right direction.
I believe one of the keys to unity in the faith of Jesus is the willingness to work together for the benefit of each other and a willingness to say "I think I was wrong about this or that"

Anyways, just so you know my position, I do not believe that repentance and faith are 100% hand-outs. I believe that man is responsible for his own repentance(which of course is not possible without the hearing of the word), and that faith not only involves assent to truth, but consent of the volition (will) to the assent of the truth. I believe that scripture shows repentance to be our responsiblity in that all men are commanded to repent, and I believe that scripture shows faith to involve consent of the will in that we must accept Jesus as Lord of our lives. I know that some people like to camp around two scriptures to prove that repentance is a gift and faith is a gift. I do agree that they are , but not in the sense that some see that they are. Repentance is granted in the sense that its exercise is permitted when the gospel message has been received. Faith is a gift because Jesus is a gift. Through faith = through Jesus. Paul was stressing that no man should be able to boast in himself....for God is the one who has paved the way....God is the One who has invented the faith.....not us.
Just wanted you to understand me better so you know where I come from in any future discussion.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
Hi Daniel,

According to your reply, I understood that you realize that you did not choose God, but that He chose you.

He gave you the gift of faith to believe the words of Jesus regarding the Gospel of Salvation.

I certainly agree with that truth.

I wonder, though, why you replied to this topic, since you didn't really discuss it.

waynemlj
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
The argument for 'correct theology' is the very reason why we have a burgeoning array of denominations, each of whom has 'the correct theology'.

Why try to figure something like that out? I dunno! But we do, and depending on how you look at it, two possibilities that represent different paths for different people, could both be right in God's economy. For ex. in the case of His dying for all, from our viewpoint, i have to hold that it is true. However, He knows all who will be saved; so from His viewpoint, only the elect represent those for whom He died.

I don't think that we are meant to figure this out until later. In the mean time, we can create denominational subdivisions for each one to choose, for, or against. In such case there would be at least three minimum: one for; one against; and one who doesn't understand, or care for that matter, who is happy to go along and praise Him for what they are able to grasp, while those opposing argue over it. Does it make any difference as to their eternal destiny?


Next! There is something that is 100 percent hand out. Not to discover it is mournful. Then, repentance is up to you, no? Yet, you can trust Him for your repentance. You can.

There is deep mystery, yet there is deep wonder. His glory is great, and He wants us to discover it. This is His heart.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
We get to choose, and that settles it. But, did we choose Him, or did He choose us? (See what i mean? Do we really choose, or were we chosen to choose?) But scripture says "Not that we loved Him, but that He loved us first." That would follow after nemlj's assertion. Yet, take nothing for granted, but fear.

Perhaps i am obnoxious, but it is important. I wouldn't assert myself so vigorously for a thin theology that doesn't reward according to His riches and glory!
 
Posted by scythewieldor (Member # 6830) on :
 
Dear friends,
Once, when I was a jailer, one of the inmates (which was there for abusing his wife, I think) wanted to discuss the sun-clad woman of The Revelation.
I told him that he needed to learn how to treat women that were in his own life more than he needed to know about the nuances of such prophetic imagery.
In fact, if a person is faithful in little, he will be given more.
What I am trying to say is that there are so many who want to engage audiences in subjects over which there is much argument just so they can sell a book that promises to clarify what they couldn't say clearly. Yet, they are disobedient concerning the "do-able" stuff of the New Testament.
For instance, Paul, inspired by the Holy Spirit, says, many times and in many ways, that all are supposed to work with their hands. Indeed, they are to make it their ambition to do that in such a way that they can help support the weak and not need contributions from others.
Being disobedient to that one ordinance is sufficient for separation from fellowship because he is nothing but a swindler trying to get paid to explain a God he does not know. He does not care to follow the example of the one that bought him.
So, if a theologian's "pract-ology" is not right, he ought to keep his theology to himself. Otherwise, he is just another of those Acts 20:30 kind of guys.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
(I knew that the truth would come out about some of you internet police.)


Ok! When someone tries to nail down their theology, what they are doing is forming the boundries wherein they feel secure and comfortable. They fill those boundries with the likeminded with whom they can associate securely so that they can feel reinforced. But the life that is Christ is beyond theology because it is the life tht IS Christ. It is a faith/revelation thing. The denomination IS Christ. The understanding IS Christ. It is the life on the rock (not rocks, or sinking sand). Thereafter, every wind of doctrine (Eph4:14) becomes insignificant, for the person of whom their life consists, is established unto them in a unique way. Celebrate!
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi Waynemlj,
I would like to ask you a question that relates to something you said in your last post to me.....about the "gift of faith".......

How about the lost/unbelieving? are they one's who refuse to repent and believe, or are they one's to whom God does not desire to give the gift of repentance and the gift of faith? Your answer to this question will help me to understand your position better.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by scythewieldor (Member # 6830) on :
 
Dear friends,
In other words, the Truth is something you do, not just something you know.
quote:
1 John 1:5 ¶ This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:
7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

The fellowship with God maintains the lighted walk. Notice that the cleansing of the blood of Jesus Christ, God's son, from all sin is synergistic with (if not consequential to) the lighted walk and fellowship with believers.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
The truth is not something that you 'do', because you cannot. It is something that you participate in with the doer, by faith.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
(You preach the most precious truth unspeakable in glory, and rather than laying hold, the hearers clinch harder the lardar [Frown] ))
 
Posted by Eden (Member # 5728) on :
 
Michael Harrison said
quote:
It is something that you participate in with the doer, by faith.
When I found out I couldn't be good, I quit trying to be good. When I got out of the way, the Holy Spirit got going.

love, eden
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Hi Waynemlj,
I would like to ask you a question that relates to something you said in your last post to me.....about the "gift of faith".......

How about the lost/unbelieving? are they one's who refuse to repent and believe, or are they one's to whom God does not desire to give the gift of repentance and the gift of faith? Your answer to this question will help me to understand your position better.

With love in Christ, Daniel

Hi Daniel,

Just got back to the computer!

The answer to your question here is actually both of those choices you asked about.

The New Testament (as well as the Old Testament) everywhere reveals the fact that salvation is a predeternined choice of God.

The Father chose (elected) those whom He sent His Son (by their joint covenant) to earth to die for and save from the Father's wrath against sinful hearts.

If we even look at these words from Jesus to His apostles, we can see the same meaning.

John 15:16, "You did not choose me, but I chose you, and appointed you . . . "

God does the choosing for His own perfect reasons. That's what is meant by Limited Atonement.

The Father sent the Son to die in the place of the Elect (and only the Elect) to save them from the eternal punishment for their disobedience which would mean being cast into the outer darkness and torment of hell.

First, as Jesus told Nicodemus, "You have to be born again." Then you can receive the gift of faith to believe in Jesus Christ as your Savior.

John 3;3, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."

And if that hasn't happened to our neighbor, we our powerless to convince him of the urgency to accept the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Hope this helps.

waynemlj
 
Posted by scythewieldor (Member # 6830) on :
 
Dear friends,
quote:
1 John 3:18 My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.
19 And hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before him.
20 ¶ For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things.
21 Beloved, if our heart condemn us not, then have we confidence toward God.
22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
23 ¶ And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.

1 Cor 8:1 ¶ Now as touching things offered unto idols, we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth.
2 And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.
3 But if any man love God, the same is known of him.


 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Unrepentant hearts and unbelief are both more linked with our own rebellion and disobedience than anything else. If we were to say that repentance and faith are 100% hand-outs, then we would have to at least associate God with the cause for the sin of unbelief and rebellion of the lost, because God left them that way. That I am not willing to do.

Waynem, I respect your position, but do not agree with it. You hold to a particular theology that takes a small number of scriptures to back it up. Though I cannot dispute the scriptures you use, I can dispute the way that you view them and try to make a case. If I am accused of not believing in predestination, that is a false accusation. I believe in it.....but I question how some perceive it. To go as far as to say that man has absolutely nothing to do with his salvation I strongly oppose. I will also continue to believe that faith involves consent of the will otherwise we are just left with a mental assent to bible facts with no intent on acting on them.

For most of my life I was a believer, ever since I was a young child I was taught the 10 Commandments and all the fun bible stories up to Jesus. I believed in God. But it was'nt until 1995 that a bible believing man came into my life and I found myself to be a hypocrite. God's will for my life was not my concern and I had a passive attitude towards sin. I was in rebellion. I had never repented so I was an unrepentant believer......sounds like an oxymoron, but it is'nt. My believing was hypocritical because I had never come to God in sincere repentance for my rebellion to him. I was lost and never even had the spirit of God. By Gods grace He was patient and waited for me to realize that I was still in my sin and that I needed to repent. I thank him for bringing that bible-believing man into my life to help show me my real status. I was left with a decision to make: Repent, turn from my sin and position of rebellion to God and turn to God and His will for my life or just continue on living my same old life. To make a long story short I ended up repenting and then going to be baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus and sometime afterwards the Holy Spirit began to be a more identifiable part of my life.

In conclusion, I see God as providing the way and waiting on a satisfactory response from us. When He is satisfied with our response then the Holy Spirit comes into our lives and helps us to transform into Christ-likeness. Then we would become born-again....not born-again first and then repentance and faith towards Christ.

Acts 5:32 And we are His witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by CWO4GUNNER (Member # 6971) on :
 
It never ceases to amaze me how foolish we can be when we take one line of scripture to build an entire religious theology in our own minds to affect the masses. From one verse (“My prayer is not for the world, but for those you have given me, because they belong to you.") you imagine doctrine to fulfill the lust and envy of your own harts as being worth more then many others who according to you are chosen for destruction. Must make you feel pretty proud and I'm sure you will convince quite a few lofty harts, but do you think God will buy it? Will you proudly accept eternal damnation because in spite of your sincere conviction of being singled out if God informs you that by the very verse you were sincerely mistaken and are not chosen. Will you so proudly accept your own dogma and proudly walk the fires of hell.

I was afraid of you, because you are a hard man. You take out what you did not put in and reap what you did not sow. "His master replied, 'I will judge you by your own words, you wicked servant! You knew, did you, that I am a hard man, taking out what I did not put in, and reaping what I did not sow? Why then didn't you put my money on deposit, so that when I came back, I could have collected it with interest?'Luke 19:21-23

The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. 2 Peter 3:9
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
When someone tries to nail down their theology and enlist others, what they are doing is forming the boundries wherein they feel secure and comfortable (which they can relate to). They fill those boundries with the likeminded, with whom they can associate securely, without contest, so that they can feel reinforced in their belief. But the life that is Christ is beyond theology, because it is the life that IS Christ.

"Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me."(Joh 7:16)

It is a faith/revelation thing. The denomination IS Christ Himself. The understanding IS Christ. It is the life on the rock (not rocks, or sinking sand). Thereafter, every wind of doctrine (Eph4:14) becomes insignificant, for the person of whom their life consists is established unto them in a unique way. C!
 
Posted by lonlesol (Member # 4511) on :
 
quote:
...and sometime afterwards the Holy Spirit began to be a more identifiable part of my life.
oneinchrist......Can you please give me an explanation on this?...
 
Posted by scythewieldor (Member # 6830) on :
 
Praise God, dear friends,
Just yesterday morning I woke up with my son-in law's spiritual condition on my heart. I did not know a scripture according to which I could pray with full assurance that my desire for my son-in-law's conversion was in agreement with the will of God. I asked God for that scripture, and He gave it through this forum.
quote:
Originally posted by CWO4GUNNER:

The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. 2 Peter 3:9

Now I can know that I pray according to God's will, and that I have what I ask for when I give thanks that God is not willing that Nate should perish. but that he should come to repentance.
Glory to God.
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi lonlesol,
How are you doing? It's been a while since we last talked. Of course I will share with you some of the ways in which the Holy Spirit has become more identifiable in my life. Please give me a little time to collect my thoughts and do some writing so that I can share with you some of my testimony. Thank you.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by lonlesol (Member # 4511) on :
 
Hello oneinchrist...I am holding on to God's Word as much as I possibly can!...take your time, and I thank you in advance... [hug]


I have been reading this book called: ''Discern the will of the Lord in your life''...written by Paul C. Jong...anyone can get this book for free through the internet...

It is written in very simple words but pretty good in itself...there is this chapter in the book that describes exactly what I have been going through these past few years, with minor differences...as if this particular chapter was written for me!...I am typing it at this moment and will post it once I am done...


It is based on Luke 12:49-53


Luke 12:49-53 (New International Version)
New International Version (NIV)
Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society



Not Peace but Division
49"I have come to bring fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! 50But I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is completed! 51Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. 52From now on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against two and two against three. 53They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law."
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
Yahweh couldn’t care less about anything than He does your or my theology.

Yahweh is looking for hearts perfect toward Him…

2 Chronicles 16:9
For the eyes of the LORD run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to show himself strong in the behalf of them whose heart is perfect toward him. Herein thou hast done foolishly: therefore from henceforth thou shalt have wars…

Philippians 1:15
Some indeed preach Christ even of envy and strife; and some also of good will:

Do I love Yahweh with all my heart, mind body and soul ?
Do I love my neighbor as I love myself?

Is Yeshua’s Blood all I come before Yahweh with for my acceptance into sonship?

Because someone does or doesn’t believe in the teaching of Predestination, the Trinity or some other petty doctrine exclude them from Yeshua’s Love?

Read Ephesians 4 pay close attention to verse 2 and verse 13…

quote:
Michael Harrison made several very good Spiritually discerned statements…
Michael said….The argument for 'correct theology' is the very reason why we have a burgeoning array of denominations, each of whom has 'the correct theology'.

This is one reason for the Body of Christ being such a reproach in the earth today,
The Baptist say they are right,
The Pentecost say they are right,
The Methodist say they are right,
The Assemblies of God say they are right,
The Mennonites say they are right,
The Amish say they are right,

If I left some denomination out, you can fill them in all are the same.

They all divide the Body of Christ…

Where is the … With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love; Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. …

Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:

Ephesians 4
1I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called,
2With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love;
3Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.

4There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling;
5One Lord, one faith, one baptism,
6One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
7But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ.
8Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
9(Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
10He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.)
11And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;
12For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
13Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
14That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
15But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:
16From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.
17This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,
18Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:
19Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness.
20But ye have not so learned Christ;
21If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus:
22That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts;
23And be renewed in the spirit of your mind;
24And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.
25Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.
26Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:
27Neither give place to the devil.
28Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.
29Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers.
30And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.
31Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice:
32And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you.

[/QUOTE] Michael also said….. Ok! When someone tries to nail down their theology, what they are doing is forming the boundaries wherein they feel secure and comfortable. They fill those boundaries with the likeminded with whom they can associate securely so that they can feel reinforced. But the life that is Christ is beyond theology because it is the life that IS Christ. It is a faith/revelation thing. [/QUOTE]

I assure you Yahweh is bigger than any of our theology!

Yahweh can not be put in a “Once Saved, always Saved “ box!

Yahweh can not be put in a “Predestination” box!

As sure as you say Yahweh can’t do this or that He will show you different!


[IMG]Photobucket[/IMG]

[IMG]Photobucket[/IMG]

[IMG]Photobucket[/IMG]

I CERTAINLY THOUGHT THIS WAS ENLIGHTENING. BEYOND OUR SUN ... IT'S A BIG UNIVERSE.

[IMG]Photobucket[/IMG]

Photobucket


ANTARES IS THE 15TH BRIGHTEST STAR IN THE SKY.
IT IS MORE THAN 1000 LIGHT YEARS AWAY.
NOW HOW BIG ARE YOU?
------------------------------------------------------------------

NOW TRY TO WRAP YOUR MIND AROUND THIS.........


THIS IS A HUBBLE TELESCOPE ULTRA DEEP FIELD INFRAR ED VIEW OF COUNTLESS
'ENTIRE' GALAXIES BILLIONS OF LIGHT-YEARS AWAY.

Photobucket

BELOW IS A CLOSE UP OF ONE OF THE DARKEST REGIONS OF THE PHOTO ABOVE .


[IMG]Photobucket[/IMG]


HUMBLING, ISN'T IT?


And yet, Someone knows how many hairs are on your head,

and not even a single sparrow dies apart from His will (Mt 10:29 -31)!


NOW HOW BIG ARE YOU?
AND HOW BIG ARE THE THINGS THAT UPSET YOU TODAY?


AND HOW BIG IS YOUR GOD?

KEEP LIFE IN PERSPECTIVE.

IT'S ALL UNDER CONTROL (Job 38)
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi again Lonlesol,
This testimony that I am about to share is the first time I have shared it publicly on a christian site. I will need to share the whole story from start to present in order that you may believe and see God's hand in it.

In November of 2005 a co-worker friend of mine came up to me and asked me if I had heard the latest headline news. I said "no, now what?" Then he said "you never pay attention" then he went on to say that they arrested this guy Steven Avery for murder. He told me that he was the guy who caught national attention for being falsely imprisoned for over 16 yrs, and that he was also awaiting a big lawsuit case vs. State of WI. I said "that dont make any sense, what would be his motive?" My friend replied "because he must be either extremely stupid or nuts". Conversation ended and I was thinking about how the story did'nt seem to make sense.

In case you are wondering what this case is about....Teresa Halbach, a photographer from Hilbert, WI who worked for Auto Trader magazine went to Steven Avery's Auto Salvage yard to photo shoot some automobiles. This was the last time that she was seen by her family and friends and co-workers. The amount of physical evidence that was found on Steven Avery's property seemed to be enough to link him to the crime. He was arrested and then a year or so later was given a guilty sentence along with his nephew Brendon Dassey.

Well, anyways, the next day after I heard the news I decided to do a search on the internet to pick up the local news on the Teresa Halbach disappearance. I came upon a very peculiar article that stated that the search party that found Teresa Halbach's SUV on Steven Avery's property was headed by Teresa's ex-boyfriend. The ex-boyfriend also had made a comment to the News station that "she will be missed". I thought that was a strange thing to say considering Teresa Halbach was still only considered missing at that time. The next day I decided to call the FBI and share with them the information I found, and tell them that there could be the possibility that they have arrested the wrong guy in connection with Teresa Halbach's assumed death. They did express an interest and they ended up contacting the local Green Bay Field Office FBI.

A few days later I had a vision (I was awake before it began) in the night. The first vision was of a body of woods. I was being carried over the top of the woods so I was looking down at them from an ariel position. It was night time but a light was shining down so I could see clearly that it was a wooded area. The vision suddenly ended and then there was this brief moment of silence before the next vision opened up. Suddenly in the next vision I realized that I was on a beach. There was a light shining so I could see the sand for a good distance in both directions. Then all of a sudden after I realized what I saw then this vision suddenly ended and there was another brief moment of silence.......then suddenly a word was spoken, and that word was "shoe". It was as if the word stretched out and carried over water--but without an echo. I jumped out of bed and the first thing I did was find a Wisconsin map. I wanted to see if there was a wooded beach area near Steven Avery's property. To my astonishment, there indeed was, and it was located only a few miles down the road from Avery's property. It was a state forest area that joined up with the Lake Michigan beach. My next thought was "Oh my God" (in a good way) could it be that Teresa was murdered in that area and one of her shoes flew off?

I decided to call the FBI again. I knew they would think it quite strange that I was calling with a "dream", but I believed that I needed to do it. I told them that maybe they should have a search party down by the State Forest Lake Michigan area, which is quite close to the Avery Property. I had believed it would be a good idea to rule out any other possibilities.

Well, to fast foward a little more I found that the Milwaukee Branch FBI thought seriously about what I had told them, but the Green Bay FBI was not as interested claiming that the local police are "good and dependable guys" and they would not carelessly put the wrong guy in jail. I eventually was told by the Green Bay FBI that I was the crazy and obsessed one.

I was determined not to give up on the vision. I was able to get a hold of the ex-boyfriend's adress so I decided that I needed to send him a letter. I wrote to him detailing out the vision that I had which came in three distinct parts. The body of woods, the sandy beach, and the word "shoe". I recommended that if he is party to the crime that he let's out the truth for the freedom of the falsely accused, and that he be reconciled to God.

Today, I am still waiting to see the convicting power of the Word of God come to fruition. Perhaps God revealed something to me that no one else could possibly know save except God and the criminal. I do not know for sure, but there is hope in me that burns like a flame--desiring to see that day where we all can begin to digest the truth that God does really care and love us--and that the Holy Spirit has not abandoned us.

Acts 2:17 And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams: and on my servants and on my handsmaidens I will pour out in those days of my spirit; and they shall prophesy....

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
Jesus is my theology, not something about Him, save one!
 
Posted by CWO4GUNNER (Member # 6971) on :
 
I want to add a point to a verse that lonlesol posted above because it hit me and underscores an important truth. But first let me say it is important within our core Christin beliefs to know what we believe and why we believe it, these things I don't have to repeat here because you already know them. They are the beliefs that separates all of Christendom from the cults. Beyond this all our disagreements are trivial and fall far far behind our duty which is first and foremost that Christ is preached. Paul and Timothy made a very good point in Phil 1: 15-18 and that is if there is going to be strife among believers, let it be over the good news of Christ being preached. Paul was comfortable with this because he knew that even though we (man) is prone to being unfaithful and a lier, but God is always faithful and true. So even though my spirit gets stirred up over those that preach the Gospel in ways I don't agree, I never let it bother my sleep anymore because God's and his word is faithful like a two edged sword and the very reason I was saved while a catholic by just reading the catholic Bible. Praise God, let every man be a lier,but let God be true.

It is true that some preach Christ out of envy and rivalry, but others out of goodwill. The latter do so in love, knowing that I am put here for the defense of the gospel. The former preach Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely, supposing that they can stir up trouble for me while I am in chains. But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. Phil 1: 15-18

What if some did not believe and were without faith? Does their lack of faith and their faithlessness nullify and make ineffective and void the faithfulness of God and His fidelity to His Word? By no means! Let God be found true though every human being is false and a liar, as it is written, That You God may be justified and shown to be upright in what You say, and prevail when You are judged by sinful men.
John 21:20-22

With respect to my earlier post I want to point out that Christians including myself have always had a bad habit of seeking comfort by trying to determine God's judment on other individuals and groups to make us feel secure. While it is a good thing to point out, quote and believe what the scriptures says in regards to judment it is none of our business to be excluding groups or individuals from salvation to satisfy our personal secure position with God, I have also done it in the past God forgive me. Nevertheless Jesus made this clear when he told Peter to mind his own business when he wanted to know what would happen to the betrayer (i.e.:is he going to hell lord?). Its not out judment, God will judge the world! Our job is to preach the good news of Jesus Christ crucified for the remission of sins.

But Peter turned and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved, following--the one who also had leaned back on His breast at the supper and had said, Lord, who is it that is going to betray You? When Peter saw him, he said to Jesus, Lord, what about this man? Jesus said to him, If I want him to stay (survive, live) until I come, what is that to you? [What concern is it of yours?] You follow Me!
John 21:20-22
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Michael Harrison:
(I knew that the truth would come out about some of you internet police.)


"Ok! When someone tries to nail down their theology, what they are doing is forming the boundries wherein they feel secure and comfortable. They fill those boundries with the likeminded with whom they can associate securely so that they can feel reinforced. But the life that is Christ is beyond theology because it is the life tht IS Christ. It is a faith/revelation thing. The denomination IS Christ. The understanding IS Christ. It is the life on the rock (not rocks, or sinking sand). Thereafter, every wind of doctrine (Eph4:14) becomes insignificant, for the person of whom their life consists, is established unto them in a unique way. Celebrate!

"

Hi Michael,

In your quote above, you object to those who want to "nail down their theology," but God's word says in 2 Timothy 2:15, "Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth."

The dictionary defines theology as the study of the nature of God and religious truth; rational inquiry into religious questions, especially those posed by Christianity.

I hope you won't give up on the process of honest investigation into the truths of the Bible.

waynemlj
 
Posted by scythewieldor (Member # 6830) on :
 
Dear friends,
When I was about 28 years old, I was trying to get into "the full-time ministry". I asked the Lord what I should teach: once saved-always saved, rapture, speaking in tongues, whatever else there is?
His response was so clear. "Teach what I said to teach."
I thought, "I should know this one."
Hmmmm.
That would be:

You get the picture.
Later, as I was reading Paul's letters to Timothy and Titus, I found some things the Holy Spirit said to teach. However the things we are supposed to teach are all instructions about how to maintain the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace.
You can't make a living off of people when you are limited to that stuff. Even Paul, in Acts, chapter 20, only took about 3 years to teach the Ephesian overseers all the counsel of God. And he maintained a job, working with his hands, while he did that.
Clearly, Paul was in the full-time ministry in a world-changing way.

So, the denominations are not limiting themselves to "the counsels of God". They are offering licensed franchises for retail theology outlets and feel-good stations. Certainly, they use scriptures. However, they stay away from the instructional ones and focus on the informational ones.
Informational scriptures (scriptures that refer to history, wisdom, and prophecy) are very open to interpretation. A tweak here and an emphasis there and a little "things have changed in 2000 years" in another place, and you can really put together some ticklish stuff- even, sensational stuff.
But, is it the stuff that turns the world upside- down. Or, is it stuff that omits the commands of Jesus and the Holy Spirit making the church a comfortable place for the worldly.
I don't need the "just stuff" stuff.
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
scythewieldor [thumbsup2]
 
Posted by CWO4GUNNER (Member # 6971) on :
 
Let us then praise God in the highest, that although he doesn't need us, he loves and uses us to preach the simple message that the world stumbles on and considers foolish. Man is a lier but God is faithful and God's word will prevail and will be done in earth and heaven in spite of our weak use of his message and our filthy righteousness. Jesus Christ has save us from this body of death, so long as we abide in him.

"scythewieldor: Or, is it stuff that omits the commands of Jesus and the Holy Spirit making the church a comfortable place for the worldly.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
[Prayer]

quote:
In your quote above, you object to those who want to "nail down their theology," but God's word says in 2 Timothy 2:15, "Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth."

Do your best? Do you not know that your best does not even approach good enough?

"Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers."(2Ti 2:14)

Then it says to study to show thyself approved unto God. Study to show thyself, unto God - approved, rightly dividing the word. That would include Theology. Dividing the word will yield anyone a Theology. Theology that comes short of who He is, is not rightly divided. It becomes one's snare unless it approves one 'unto' God. Regrettably, one becomes proud of his Theology. Even more regrettably, one doesn't recognize that pride is the very signature of error inherent. It should be recognizable in the light of the word, and should encourage one to seek deeper.
 
Posted by jiggyfly (Member # 6972) on :
 
Anyone here familiar with Jurgen Moltmann's theology?
 
Posted by WildB (Member # 2917) on :
 
Jürgen Moltmann
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jürgen Moltmann (born April 8, 1926) is a German Protestant theologian.

* 1 Moltmann's Youth
* 2 World War II
* 3 Theology in the camps
* 4 Returning home
* 5 Influences
* 6 Theology
* 7 Bibliography in English
* 8 Secondary Bibliography
* 9 Footnotes
* 10 References
* 11 External links

[edit] Moltmann's Youth

Moltmann was born in Hamburg, Germany. He described his German upbringing as thoroughly secular. His grandfather was a grand master of the Freemasons. At sixteen, Moltmann idolized Albert Einstein, and anticipated studying mathematics at university. The physics of relativity were "fascinating secrets open to knowledge"; theology as yet played no role in his life.

[edit] World War II

He took his entrance exam to proceed with his education, but went to war instead as an Air Force auxiliary in the German army. "The 'iron rations' in the way of reading matter which I took with me into the miseries of war were Goethe's poems and the works of Nietzsche."[1] He was actually drafted into military service in 1944, when he became a soldier in the German army. Ordered to the Reichswald, a German forest at the front lines, he surrendered in 1945 in the dark to the first British soldier he met. For the next few years (1945-48), he was confined as a prisoner of war and moved from camp to camp.

[edit] Theology in the camps

He was first confined in Belgium. In the camp at Belgium, the prisoners were given little to do. Moltmann and his fellow prisoners were tormented by "memories and gnawing thoughts" — Moltmann claimed to have lost all hope and confidence in German culture because of Auschwitz and Buchenwald (concentration camps where Jews and others the Nazis opposed had been imprisoned and killed). They also glimpsed photographs nailed up confrontationally in their huts, bare photographs of Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen concentration camp.[2] Moltmann claimed his remorse was so great, he often felt he would have rather died along with many of his comrades than live to face what their nation had done.

Moltmann met a group of Christians in the camp, and was given a small copy of the New Testament and Psalms by an American chaplain. He gradually felt more and more identification with and reliance on the Christian faith. Moltmann later claimed, "I didn't find Christ, he found me."

After Belgium, he was transferred to a POW camp in Kilmarnock, Scotland, where he worked with other Germans to rebuild areas damaged in the bombing. The hospitality of the Scottish residents toward the prisoners left a great impression upon him. In July of 1946, he was transferred for the last time to Norton Camp, a British prison located near Nottingham, UK. The camp was operated by the YMCA and here Moltmann met many students of theology. At Norton Camp, he discovered Reinhold Niebuhr's Nature and Destiny of Man — it was the first book of theology he had ever read, and Moltmann claimed it had a huge impact on his life.

[edit] Returning home

Moltmann returned home at 22 years of age to find his hometown of Hamburg (in fact, his entire country) in ruins from Allied bombing in World War II. Moltmann immediately went to work in an attempt to express a theology that would reach what he called "the survivors of [his] generation". Moltmann had hope that the example of the "Confessing Church" during the war would be repeated in new ecclesiastical structures. He and many others were disappointed to see, instead, a rebuilding on pre-war models in a cultural attempt to forget entirely the recent period of deadly hardship.

In 1947, he and four others were invited to attend the first postwar Student Christian Movement in Swanwick, a conference center near Derby. What happened there affected him very deeply. Moltmann returned to Germany to study at the University of Göttingen, an institution whose professors were followers of Karl Barth and theologians who were engaged with the confessing [non-state] church in Germany.

Since his studies at Göttingen ended, Moltmann has continued to speak and write concerning his views of theology.

[edit] Influences

Moltmann cites the English theologian Studdert Kennedy as being highly regarded and relies on Ernst Bloch in his important Theology of Hope. In the Spring 2004 Pneuma, Moltmann cites the Johann and Christoph Blumhardt as being major contributors to his thought.

[edit] Theology

The early Moltmann can be seen in his trilogy, Theology of Hope (1964), The Crucified God (1972), and The Church in the Power of the Spirit (1975):

* Theology of Hope was strongly influenced by the eschatological orientation of the marxist philosopher, Ernst Bloch's The Principle of Hope.
* The Crucified God posited that God died on the Cross, raising the question of the impassibility of God.
* The Church in the Power of the Spirit explores the implications of these explorations for the church in its own life and in the world.

This early phase has been compared to the liberation theologies predominantly found in Latin America at that time. The later Moltmann took a more systematic approach to theology, seen by some as less radical and less challenging.

[edit] Bibliography in English

Some of Moltmann's works that are available in English include:

* Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of a Christian Eschatology, SCM Press, London, 1967
* The Gospel of Liberation, Word, Waco, Texas, 1973
* The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ As the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology, SCM Press, London, 1973
* Man: Christian Anthropology in the Conflicts of the Present, SPCK, London, 1974
* The Church in the Power of the Spirit: A Contribution to Messianic Ecclesiology, SCM Press, London, 1975
* The Experiment Hope, SCM Press, London, 1975
* The Open Church, SCM Press, London, 1978
* The Future of Creation, SCM Press, London, 1979
* The Trinity and the Kingdom: The Doctrine of God, Harper and Row, New York, 1981
* History and the Triune God: Contributions to Trinitarian Theology
* God in Creation, SCM Press, London, 1985
* The Way of Jesus Christ
* The Spirit of Life: A Universal Affirmation, SCM Press, London, 1992
* The Coming of God: Christian Eschatology, Fortress, Minneapolis, 1996.
* The Source of Life, SCM Press, London, 1997
* Experiences in Theology: ways and forms of Christian Theology, SCM Press, London, 2000
* Science and Wisdom, SCM Press, London, 2003
* In the End the Beginning, SCM Press, London, 2004
* Is “Pluralistic Theology” Useful for the Dialogue of World Religions?" in D’Costa, Gavin, Christian Uniqueness Reconsidered (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1990

[edit] Secondary Bibliography

* Moltmann: Messianic Theology in the Making, by Richard Bauckham, Basingstoke, Marshall Pickering, 1987
* God, Hope, and History: Jurgen Moltmann and the Christian Concept of History, by A. J. Conyers, 1988
* The Creative Suffering of God, by Paul S. Fiddes, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1988
* The Theology of Jurgen Moltmann, by Richard Bauckham, Edinburgh, T & T Clark, 1995
* The Future of Theology: Essays in Honour of Jurgen Moltmann, ed. M. Volf, 1996
* God Will Be All in All: The Eschatology of Jurgen Moltmann, ed. Richard Bauckham, Edinburgh, T & T Clark, 1999
* Disavowing Constantine: Mission, Church and the Social Order in the Theologies of John H. Yoder and Jurgen Moltmann, by Nigel Wright, Carlisle, Paternoster, 2000
* The Kingdom and the Power: The Theology of Jurgen Moltmann, by Geiko Muller-Fahrenholz, 2001

[edit] Footnotes

1. ^ The items were a gift from his sister. In other places, Moltmann mentions that "Faust" was included in the collection of Goethe's poetry.
2. ^ The initial reaction of the prisoners to these photos was that they were British propaganda.

[edit] References

* Jürgen Moltmann, "Why am I a Christian?" in Experiences of God (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1980).
* Jürgen Moltmann, "An Autobiographical Note" in A. J. Conyers, God, Hope and History: Jürgen Moltmann and the Christian Concept of History (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1988).
* Jürgen Moltmann, Foreword to M. Douglas Meeks, Origins of the Theology of Hope (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1974).
* Jürgen Moltmann, address given at Nazarene Theological Seminary, Dec. 10, 2001.
* Jürgen Moltmann, "Stubborn Hope", interviewer Christopher A. Hall, Christianity Today, vol. 37, no. 1 (Jan. 11, 1993).

[edit] External links
 
Posted by jiggyfly (Member # 6972) on :
 
WildB are you familiar with Moltmann's theology? I was interested in conversing about his theology with others. I have read some of his books. I wasn't trying to get info about him.
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Unrepentant hearts and unbelief are both more linked with our own rebellion and disobedience than anything else. If we were to say that repentance and faith are 100% hand-outs, then we would have to at least associate God with the cause for the sin of unbelief and rebellion of the lost, because God left them that way. That I am not willing to do.

Waynem, I respect your position, but do not agree with it. You hold to a particular theology that takes a small number of scriptures to back it up. Though I cannot dispute the scriptures you use, I can dispute the way that you view them and try to make a case. If I am accused of not believing in predestination, that is a false accusation. I believe in it.....but I question how some perceive it. To go as far as to say that man has absolutely nothing to do with his salvation I strongly oppose. I will also continue to believe that faith involves consent of the will otherwise we are just left with a mental assent to bible facts with no intent on acting on them.

For most of my life I was a believer, ever since I was a young child I was taught the 10 Commandments and all the fun bible stories up to Jesus. I believed in God. But it was'nt until 1995 that a bible believing man came into my life and I found myself to be a hypocrite. God's will for my life was not my concern and I had a passive attitude towards sin. I was in rebellion. I had never repented so I was an unrepentant believer......sounds like an oxymoron, but it is'nt. My believing was hypocritical because I had never come to God in sincere repentance for my rebellion to him. I was lost and never even had the spirit of God. By Gods grace He was patient and waited for me to realize that I was still in my sin and that I needed to repent. I thank him for bringing that bible-believing man into my life to help show me my real status. I was left with a decision to make: Repent, turn from my sin and position of rebellion to God and turn to God and His will for my life or just continue on living my same old life. To make a long story short I ended up repenting and then going to be baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus and sometime afterwards the Holy Spirit began to be a more identifiable part of my life.

In conclusion, I see God as providing the way and waiting on a satisfactory response from us. When He is satisfied with our response then the Holy Spirit comes into our lives and helps us to transform into Christ-likeness. Then we would become born-again....not born-again first and then repentance and faith towards Christ.

Acts 5:32 And we are His witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.

With love in Christ, Daniel

Hi Daniel,

Your words:

"In conclusion, I see God as providing the way and waiting on a satisfactory response from us. When He is satisfied with our response then the Holy Spirit comes into our lives and helps us to transform into Christ-likeness. Then we would become born-again....not born-again first and then repentance and faith towards Christ."

In your words above, you apparently do not agree with Jesus because you have reversed the process by which a man must be saved.

First comes regeneration by the Holy Spirit as we can see even as far back as Ezekiel where God shows us that unless He gives us a new heart, we can't be saved.

Ezekiel 11:19, "And I will give them one heart, and a new spirit I will put within them. I will remove the heart of stone from their flesh and give them a heart of flesh, that they may walk in my statutes and keep my rules and obey them.

And they shall be my people, and I will be their God."

The "heart of stone" means the one we are born with in our Fallen nature. That heart cannot respond to the call of God . . . will not respond to the call of God . . . is opposed to God, in fact, hates God.

The new "heart of flesh" is the regenerated (recreated) heart by the Holy Spirit. This heart can "hear" the words of God, is attracted to them, loves God's truth . . . a complete reversal of the Fallen heart.

That's what Jesus was trying to get Nicodemus to understand.
John 3:3-6, "Jesus answered him, 'Truly,truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Nicodemus said to him, 'How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother's womb and be born?'

Jesus answered, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.

That which is Born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.'"

If you read down a few more verses you learn that Nicodemus was the teacher of Israel. That means he was the head of the entire religious men of his day, and when a large group of them were in a dispute, they went to Nicodemus because his knowledge of the Law (the Torah) was so great.

And, yet, he didn't have a clue about what Jesus was teaching him about salvation.

In conclusion: The Bible tells you that the Holy Spirit must regenerate your heart FIRST; then, God can give you the gift of faith (justification). Then you want to fall on your knees before Him and repent of your evil.

That's the Bible's revelation of how salvation works, and only those whom the Spirit regenerates (the Elect) can believe and be saved.

The rest will be lost to eternal damnation in terrible darkness and torment.

That's why we should be very thankful to God for "His unspeakable gift," and tell everyone we can about salvation through the Gospel of Jesus Christ!

waynemlj
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
Many a Christian, if not nearly all, that is - believer, still has a stony heart even after salvation. It is quite clear that the stony heart has to be broken up and cleared before one can know Christ the way they are supposed to. But this is not well received, because of the stone heart of the hearer. Though he be saved, he will still argue with God over the truth, before his being broken.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
quote:
To quote your quote
quote:
Unrepentant hearts and unbelief are both more linked with our own rebellion and disobedience than anything else. If we were to say that repentance and faith are 100% hand-outs, then we would have to at least associate God with the cause for the sin of unbelief and rebellion of the lost, because God left them that way.

You do not see faith as a 100% handout because you do not believe; and that quite simply

~~~~~~~~~ [Prayer] is your part [Prayer] ~~~~~~~~

- to believe!

Moreover, to be even more explicit, your part is to repent

~~~~~~~~~ [Cross] of 'unbelief' [Cross] ~~~~~~~~~

thereby to be affectionately delivered into His living care.

So you are right. However, upon believing, you discover the 100% side of this. Germinate, thou seed.
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi Waynemlj,
You are not comparing scripture with scripture. You are comparing scripture to the doctrine of "the total depravity of man" to come up with the conclusions that you do.
Sure seems like we have a pretty mean God if He sends people that "helplessly" reject the gospel to Hell.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Hi Waynemlj,
You are not comparing scripture with scripture. You are comparing scripture to the doctrine of "the total depravity of man" to come up with the conclusions that you do.
Sure seems like we have a pretty mean God if He sends people that "helplessly" reject the gospel to Hell.

With love in Christ, Daniel

Hi Daniel,

No one "helplessly" rejects the gospel. If you do a good reading through Romans ch.1, you get the picture of what we are like in our Fallen Nature.

But, anyway, here's just one verse to reflect on.
Romans 1:18, "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth."

That sounds like we are very deliberate in our rebellion against God.

God is holy beyond anythng we can imagine.

The prophet Isaiah discovered that truth when God appeared to him in a vision in

Isaiah 6:4-5, "And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke.

And I said, 'Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts.'"

waynemlj
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
waynemlj

"if we endure, we will also reign with him.
If we disown him, he will also disown us;" 2Ti 2:12,13
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi again Waynemlj,
It appears that we do agree that an individual does not helplessly reject the gospel. But I am a little confused then. According to you, the elect repent and believe because the Holy Spirit decided to regenerate them. Does'nt that leave all the rest that the Holy Spirit decided not to regenerate in a "helpless" state unable to repent and believe? So what is the difference between helpless and unable to repent/believe and "helplessly rejecting then?"

I would like if you would consider this verse. John 17:20 "Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which SHALL believe on me through their word;

It appears that the word "shall", when used by Jesus could easily be translated "will".

Let me show you a few more examples throughout scripture.

Rev. 8:16-17 They shall (will) hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall (will) the sun light on them, nor any heat.
For the lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall (will) feed them, and shall(will) lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall (will) wipe away all tears from their eyes.

A translation of must, can, could, should,or would, would not suffice in the above. I could find many more examples where "will" would be a suitable translatation for "shall". Anyways, to get to the point that I am going to try and make..........

Jesus does not say "but for them also which can believe on me through their word", He says...."but for them also which shall (will) believe on me through their word. The word believe in this verse is an action verb.

Its not that men cannot believe, its that they will not believe.....there is a huge difference between the two. Gotta go talk later.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Hi again Waynemlj,
It appears that we do agree that an individual does not helplessly reject the gospel. But I am a little confused then. According to you, the elect repent and believe because the Holy Spirit decided to regenerate them. Does'nt that leave all the rest that the Holy Spirit decided not to regenerate in a "helpless" state unable to repent and believe? So what is the difference between helpless and unable to repent/believe and "helplessly rejecting then?"

I would like if you would consider this verse. John 17:20 "Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which SHALL believe on me through their word;

It appears that the word "shall", when used by Jesus could easily be translated "will".

Let me show you a few more examples throughout scripture.

Rev. 8:16-17 They shall (will) hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall (will) the sun light on them, nor any heat.
For the lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall (will) feed them, and shall(will) lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall (will) wipe away all tears from their eyes.

A translation of must, can, could, should,or would, would not suffice in the above. I could find many more examples where "will" would be a suitable translatation for "shall". Anyways, to get to the point that I am going to try and make..........

Jesus does not say "but for them also which can believe on me through their word", He says...."but for them also which shall (will) believe on me through their word. The word believe in this verse is an action verb.

Its not that men cannot believe, its that they will not believe.....there is a huge difference between the two. Gotta go talk later.

With love in Christ, Daniel

__________________________________________________

Hi Daniel,

Especially these words of yours in your reply above I direct my response to:

"It's not that men cannot believe, it's that they will not believe.....there is a huge difference between the two. Gotta go talk later."

They are the same, if you think about it a little more. Whoever God does not give the gift of faith to Cannot believe and, therefore, Will not believe. Can you see that?

You have not made a distinction
that has anything in it that will change their eternal destiny.

If you just look at it logically like this, the point to be made is easy to see:

Draw a circle on a piece of paper. Now put in the circle a few dots to represent all those who are NOT given the gift of faith.

How many of those in that circle will come to believe in Christ as Savior?

None, right? Does it matter whether we say Cannot or Will not. Aren't they still in the same group?

waynemlj
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
"Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the Word of God." (Rom 10:17)

Whosoever hears, has the opportunity to believe.
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi again Waynemlj,

First of all the distinction that I am showing you is that "cannot believe" implies that one is not capable of doing, or has an insufficient capacity to function in a certain way, but on the other hand, "will not believe" indicates a deliberate refusal to put oneself in subjection to. There certainly is a big difference.

Lets cut to the chase now. You like to camp around this verse(no question about it).....

Eph: 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: IT IS THE GIFT OF GOD:

I highlighted your favorite part. I perceive you are confident in what you believe and in how you perceive it to be true. You seem to be a fairly patient person willing to work through things in a cibil manner. Lets work together on this then. I believe that we must adress this issue using the most reliable way......comparing scripture to scripture. I will present the scriptures and politely ask if you would start off the discussion by providing an explanation on how the two "seemingly" opposing scriptures can both be true without causing any contradiction to either Gods character or the consistency of His word. Here are the two verses that I believe would be fair and perfectly in line with our discussion/debate.

Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith: and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

vs.

1 Peter 2:7 Unto you therefore which believe He is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is the head of the corner.

***The question is.... How is faith a gift and at the same time unbelief is equated with disobedience?***

Since I have already elaborated on my position on this whole topic, I find it only fair that you give your explanation for these verses that seem to contradict. After you explain ,then I will reply and we both can keep going back and forth till we both can agree on reasonable conclusions. This is how debates should go...right?...peacefully.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi Michael,
You stated "whoever hears has the opportunity to believe".

My friend in the Lord, all I have to say about that is "amen". I 100% completely agree.

The word(gospel message) will be preached to all nations before the end. It appears to me that the Word is not partial in any way.......therefore we ought not to make it appear that the Holy Spirit functions with partiality in mind. Praise God for that.

Here is truth you will find consistent throughout scripture----the Holy Spirit(Helper) bears witness where the Word of Truth is spoken, not the other way around. If a lie is spoken or there is wrong intent then Jesus Christ does not authorize the Holy Spirit to bear witness.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
I strongly felt that you would agree with that.

Can I put in tru cents on this? When I was saved I was shown a copy of the Four Spiritual Laws, which is put out by Teen Challenge, or somebody. At that time it stated inside, the scenario of compliance, or understainding, which was in the form of, fact, faith, and feeling. Now, God is all for feeling. I do not think that He intends for us to live dry, feel high, and still persevere for the crown. But this chain of cause and effect starts with fact! That is the bottom line. Fact is fact. It is so because His word says so. Because the fact happens to be, then faith, which is comfort in the fact, follows. Faith accompanies fact, and that leads to a wonderful feeling, but we do not base our faith on feeling. That is the gist of the fact, faith, feeling admonition, that it starts with fact. God’s word is fact.

What happens to us is that ‘we believe’. Not only, but we choose to believe, which is a deliberate act of the will. But that is our capacity. Thereafter, because we believe, faith can fill us. Faith can fill us because we believe in a fact. That is God’s design. That is God’s order. And that is our responsibility: We believe that we receive. If our heart is true, God honors it. (If we need help believing, we can ask. That in itself shows faith.)

Now, faith is of God! This verse verifies it: 2Ti 2:13 “If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.”

But if we believe not, we do not receive of Him, which is verified by this verse: 2Ti 2:12 “If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us:”

We deny Him by unbelief.

Therefore it is demonstrated that faith is of God, “By grace are ye saved through faith, which is not of yourselves, it is the gift of God,” because faith honors, or ‘fills’ belief, which is our only capacity - to believe, or not. Our belief (or the choosing thereof) is simply faith the size of a mustard seed. True faith, big faith, is God’s, which He gives us if we truly believe.

Mar 9:24 “And straightway the father of the child cried out, and said with tears, Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief.”

And we know that the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom. (Psa 111:10) The fear of God is to believe. Some will. Some won’t. But they have to be drawn of the Spirit, or nothing will happen. Joh 6:44 “No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day. “

Predestination is a mystery!

So, faith is a gift. You have it because He gives it to you (present tense). But if you do not believe, then you are rebellious! You reject the free gift, which is woeful, because it is a ‘fact’.





i LOVE JESUS! [updown]
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CWO4GUNNER:
It never ceases to amaze me how foolish we can be when we take one line of scripture to build an entire religious theology in our own minds to affect the masses. From one verse (“My prayer is not for the world, but for those you have given me, because they belong to you.") you imagine doctrine to fulfill the lust and envy of your own harts as being worth more then many others who according to you are chosen for destruction. Must make you feel pretty proud and I'm sure you will convince quite a few lofty harts, but do you think God will buy it? Will you proudly accept eternal damnation because in spite of your sincere conviction of being singled out if God informs you that by the very verse you were sincerely mistaken and are not chosen. Will you so proudly accept your own dogma and proudly walk the fires of hell.

I was afraid of you, because you are a hard man. You take out what you did not put in and reap what you did not sow. "His master replied, 'I will judge you by your own words, you wicked servant! You knew, did you, that I am a hard man, taking out what I did not put in, and reaping what I did not sow? Why then didn't you put my money on deposit, so that when I came back, I could have collected it with interest?'Luke 19:21-23

The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. 2 Peter 3:9

Hi CWO4GUNNER,

Just got back to the computer.

I guess I need to reply to two of your points in the above Reply.

1) I'm sure that you believe that every word of Scripture is "God breathed" as is says in 2 Timothy 3:16. Assuming we agree on that truth, what difference can there be between one verse saying the Truth or twenty-five verses?
Jesus clearly separated people into two groups when He said that He was praying for those the Father gave Him for they are the Father's, but that He was not praying for the world. Certainly, the Lost are not the Father's, right?

2)Your words: "Must make you feel pretty proud and I'm sure you will convince quite a few lofty harts, but do you think God will buy it?"

My feelings have nothing to do with the matter. No, certainly not pride!


Answer a question for me, please. If Jesus possessed infinite worth and merit in Himself as the sinless oblation for our sins and our righteousness, could He fail to accomplish the appointed task to die for His Church and effectively save that Church? He said in John 17 that He lost none of those the Father gave Him and that "no one could snatch them out of the Father's hand."
How is it then that more people are going to hell than to heaven? Did Jesus and the Father both fail in Their amazing, perfect plan of salvation?

Matthew 7:13, "Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are MANY. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and FEW there are who find it."

If you want more Scripture proofs, just let me know. They're everywhere in the New Testament.

waynemlj
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by becauseHElives:
Your words I selected from a very long Post:
"Because someone does or doesn’t believe in the teaching of Predestination, the Trinity or some other petty doctrine exclude them from Yeshua’s Love?'

Hi becauseHelives,

I chose these lines from your Post because the Post was too long to Reply to and these words suffice for my concern for what you have to say here.
If you don't think Predestination and the Trinity matter except as some "petty doctrine" you are not reading the same Bible I'm reading, for sure.

That's God's Word you're trivializing. You really need to stop and think about that!

Every Word of Scripture is 'God breathed' as it says in 2 Timothy 3:16.
Romans 8:29-30, "For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be comformed to the image of he Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justifed, he also glorified.'

Do you think that the above words are there because they don't matter to God? They matter Greatly to God.

The Trinity: Matthew 28:19, "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."
Those are words from the lips of Jesus, the Word of Truth Himself.
Satan is the Liar. Jesus is the Truth!

waynemlj
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
waynemlj,

The point I am or was trying to make was not the correct doctrine is unimportant but that Yahweh is more concerned with my heart than “right doctrine”.

Just for the record I believe the doctrine of the “Trinity” as taught by all the major protestant churches is wrong but I also believe those that teach the doctrine of “Oneness” are also wrong but of the two “Trinity” is the most accurate but this would be an entirely different topic.

When a person comes into the walk of faith they do not come in with a perfect knowledge of Yeshua and His doctrines.

I have been studying the Scriptures for thirty years now; let me tell you Yahweh has changed many of my doctrines over the years.

But the one thing that I must guard is my heart.

With my heart I must love the Truth, what ever it cost me.

another point....

In the illustration of Passover how many could be saved?

Was it not whosoever will put the Blood on the door post!

In that Passover illustration could an Egyptian have put the Blood on the door post?

Yeshua’s Blood was for the whole world, every man & woman that would obey Yahweh’s directive.
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Hi again Waynemlj,

First of all the distinction that I am showing you is that "cannot believe" implies that one is not capable of doing, or has an insufficient capacity to function in a certain way, but on the other hand, "will not believe" indicates a deliberate refusal to put oneself in subjection to. There certainly is a big difference.

Lets cut to the chase now. You like to camp around this verse(no question about it).....

Eph: 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: IT IS THE GIFT OF GOD:

I highlighted your favorite part. I perceive you are confident in what you believe and in how you perceive it to be true. You seem to be a fairly patient person willing to work through things in a cibil manner. Lets work together on this then. I believe that we must adress this issue using the most reliable way......comparing scripture to scripture. I will present the scriptures and politely ask if you would start off the discussion by providing an explanation on how the two "seemingly" opposing scriptures can both be true without causing any contradiction to either Gods character or the consistency of His word. Here are the two verses that I believe would be fair and perfectly in line with our discussion/debate.

Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith: and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

vs.

1 Peter 2:7 Unto you therefore which believe He is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is the head of the corner.

***The question is.... How is faith a gift and at the same time unbelief is equated with disobedience?***

Since I have already elaborated on my position on this whole topic, I find it only fair that you give your explanation for these verses that seem to contradict. After you explain ,then I will reply and we both can keep going back and forth till we both can agree on reasonable conclusions. This is how debates should go...right?...peacefully.

With love in Christ, Daniel


 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Hi again Waynemlj,

First of all the distinction that I am showing you is that "cannot believe" implies that one is not capable of doing, or has an insufficient capacity to function in a certain way, but on the other hand, "will not believe" indicates a deliberate refusal to put oneself in subjection to. There certainly is a big difference.

Lets cut to the chase now. You like to camp around this verse(no question about it).....

Eph: 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: IT IS THE GIFT OF GOD:

I highlighted your favorite part. I perceive you are confident in what you believe and in how you perceive it to be true. You seem to be a fairly patient person willing to work through things in a cibil manner. Lets work together on this then. I believe that we must adress this issue using the most reliable way......comparing scripture to scripture. I will present the scriptures and politely ask if you would start off the discussion by providing an explanation on how the two "seemingly" opposing scriptures can both be true without causing any contradiction to either Gods character or the consistency of His word. Here are the two verses that I believe would be fair and perfectly in line with our discussion/debate.

Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith: and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

vs.

1 Peter 2:7 Unto you therefore which believe He is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is the head of the corner.

***The question is.... How is faith a gift and at the same time unbelief is equated with disobedience?***

Since I have already elaborated on my position on this whole topic, I find it only fair that you give your explanation for these verses that seem to contradict. After you explain ,then I will reply and we both can keep going back and forth till we both can agree on reasonable conclusions. This is how debates should go...right?...peacefully.

With love in Christ, Daniel

_______________________________________________

Hi Daniel,

I sure like your spirit of enquiry. You are truly seeking truth and understanding of God's Word and that is very pleasing to Him, for sure!

The two Scripture references you gave me don't contradict each other. (and you're right, God's word can't contradict itself anywhere). God is "not a God of confusion " the Bible says.

The second Scripture you quote is from 1 Peter 2:7 in which Peter is making a distinction between those who are belivers and those who are not. He is talking to the Elect and trying to encourage their faith. This is what Peter is always interested in.

So he's just saying that you and I, the elect, believe in Jesus and think that He is precious, but to those who are disobedient (the unbelievers, the non-elect) Jesus means nothing to them, and they are supposed to be the builders of the church (that would be the Pharisees and Scribes of Jesus' day).
They, in their unbelief, stumble over Jesus who is the very cornerstone of the church. But they just don't get it because they are self-righteous and will not come to God because of their stubbornness to follow their own idea of God's word. And they are left without faith and without understanding.
That second verse says, too, that faith is the gift of God.

Therefore, the two verses don't contradict each other. They say the same thing in different ways. That's all.

I hope I didn't get too long-winded in my reply.

waynemlj
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by becauseHElives:
[QB] waynemlj,

Hi becauseHelves,

I find it confusing to deal with a long Post, so I selected this line to respond to:

"In that Passover illustration could an Egyptian have put the Blood on the door post?"

No, an Egyptian could not have put the blood on the doorpost. The Egyptians were not God's elect people; they knew nothing about the true God of the Hebrews, at all.
And, anyway, God was not talking to them, but He was talking to HIS People only. The Hebrews came through the Red Sea and they held on tightly to that history and God back in Egypt, wanted to protect them from the Angel of Death, and so He told only them to put the blood on the door posts.

I edited the last few lines to correct the time periods I had confused in my original answer. It ought to make more sense,now.

waynemlj
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
waynemlj
quote:

I find it confusing to deal with a long Post, so I selected this line to respond to:

that seams to be your favorite saying but the Bible which is Yahweh's Post to His children is also His lengthy and must be understood in context of His plan for man.

, "whosoever will" means just that whosoever will....

who ever except the Blood of Yeshua's sacrifice in obedience to the conditions of Yeshua Will will will be saved...


Joshua was the one chosen by G-d to succeed Moses. He promised the land to him on behalf of the people of Israel. He was anointed by Moses to lead the people and was confirmed by G-d as the one who would actually deliver the Promised Land to the recipients of that land. The land is clearly promised to the sons of Jacob, whose name was changed to Israel. The very promise given to Abraham, confirmed to his sons and again to Moses is spoken by G-d to His representative, Joshua. Therefore it is clear that Joshua was surely and truly of Israel; recognized by Moses, called by G-d, and respected among the people as such.


But who is this fellow named Caleb? Numbers 32: 10-12 holds a hint that we often miss; a hint that is certainly overlooked by those Gentiles who align themselves with the House of Ephraim.


And HaShem's anger was kindled in that day, and he swore, saying, 'Surely none of the men that came up out of Egypt, from twenty years old and upward, shall see the land which I swore unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob; because they have not wholly followed me: save Caleb the son of Jephunneh the Kenizzite, and Joshua the son of Nun; because they have wholly followed HaShem.'"


Caleb was the son of Jephunneh, the Kenizzite. What tribe is that? It is not a tribe of Israel at all. Caleb's father was one who had joined himself to the Jewish people as they left Egypt. He was among the ones who had joined himself with the people of Israel. We read in Exodus 12:37-38 about a multitude of such people.


"And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, besides children. And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle."


Yet,when it came time to select a representative from among the tribes, it was this Caleb that Moses selected. This "grafted-in" one was considered "a prince" among his tribe, the clan of Judah. So close was the relationship of Caleb with the true Israelites, that he was given a choice inheritance in the land. He in fact, defended his right to an inheritance that was according to his position as a full-fledged member of the people of Israel. Once one has been joined to Israel, there is no distinction of Jew or Gentile any longer. Even the Passover meal is eaten only by Israelites, but scripture makes it clear that all who have come and joined themselves to the people of Israel are to be treated as equal with the true Jews.
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi Waynemlj,
I do not dispute the fact that God does the choosing. He makes the final decision.
The bone I have to pick with you is it appears that you do not believe that God's decision has anything to do with our response to Him and His word. You have placed heavy emphasis on the "predestined" portion of the word and much less emphasis on the "foreknowledge" of God.
Dont get me wrong, I do believe faith is a gift, but in the sense that God is the One who has made the way for us(established the faith that saves), and also in the sense of the diversity of gifts that is distributed to the body for the effectual work of the Lord in drawing in unbelievers and the edifying and building up the body in the unity of love and peace....but I do not believe that this one verse voids the responsiblity that man has towards God in repentance and faith.
In repentance a man must turn from his sin and position of rebellion to God, and in faith a man must heed to the words of Jesus and his conditions of discipleship.

I have discovered that Paul uses the word "faith" in more than one way changing emphasis and meaning of the entire message. Take notice of the following ways in which Paul uses the word "faith"

Acts 20:21 Testifying both to the Jews, and also to the Greeks, repentance towards God, and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ.

Romans 9:32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law.

Colossians 1:23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard...

2 Timothy 3 14-15 But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

--I could find several more verses which show that faith is not one-sided.

In the book of Ephesians Paul is adressing a group of believers who have already repented towards God and exercised faith towards Christ in baptism and confession. He is careful in his selection of words to remind them of the source of all blessing so as to deter pride, but I do not see how this would void the necessity of our repentance towards God and faith towards Jesus.

I guess I have questions ......If Paul speaks of faith as a gift from God how is it that he also speaks of faith towards the Lord Jesus? Why would he need to admonish believers to continue in the faith? How could there be faith without works? and lastly how could there be faith without love?

Pauls objective seemed pretty clear. He desired that his audience would see no dichotomy between "what faith is" and "who Christ is". I think the problem comes in when people think that "justification by faith" voids out man's responsiblities in repentance and faith.
We may have a world of people that say the sinners prayer, but never forsake their sin, and never respond to Jesus invitation to follow Him. What happens if we have all of our theology straight, but we neglect the call to discipleship, the call to leave everything behind, the call to compassion, and the call to suffer for the sake of Christ?

With love in Christ, Daniel

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by waynemlj:
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Hi again Waynemlj,
It appears that we do agree that an individual does not helplessly reject the gospel. But I am a little confused then. According to you, the elect repent and believe because the Holy Spirit decided to regenerate them. Does'nt that leave all the rest that the Holy Spirit decided not to regenerate in a "helpless" state unable to repent and believe? So what is the difference between helpless and unable to repent/believe and "helplessly rejecting then?"

I would like if you would consider this verse. John 17:20 "Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which SHALL believe on me through their word;

It appears that the word "shall", when used by Jesus could easily be translated "will".

Let me show you a few more examples throughout scripture.

Rev. 8:16-17 They shall (will) hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall (will) the sun light on them, nor any heat.
For the lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall (will) feed them, and shall(will) lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall (will) wipe away all tears from their eyes.

A translation of must, can, could, should,or would, would not suffice in the above. I could find many more examples where "will" would be a suitable translatation for "shall". Anyways, to get to the point that I am going to try and make..........

Jesus does not say "but for them also which can believe on me through their word", He says...."but for them also which shall (will) believe on me through their word. The word believe in this verse is an action verb.

Its not that men cannot believe, its that they will not believe.....there is a huge difference between the two. Gotta go talk later.

With love in Christ, Daniel

__________________________________________________

Hi Daniel,

Especially these words of yours in your reply above I direct my response to:

"It's not that men cannot believe, it's that they will not believe.....there is a huge difference between the two. Gotta go talk later."

They are the same, if you think about it a little more. Whoever God does not give the gift of faith to Cannot believe and, therefore, Will not believe. Can you see that?

You have not made a distinction
that has anything in it that will change their eternal destiny.

If you just look at it logically like this, the point to be made is easy to see:

Draw a circle on a piece of paper. Now put in the circle a few dots to represent all those who are NOT given the gift of faith.

How many of those in that circle will come to believe in Christ as Savior?

None, right? Does it matter whether we say Cannot or Will not? Aren't they still in the same group?

waynemlj

Hi, again, Daniel,

I guess I was rather rushed the other day when I replied to your quote here. You were interested in the difference between "shall" and "will." Being a retired English teacher, I can assure you that they mean the same thing in most common usage, and certainly, in these words of Jesus they do mean the same thing.

He is also praying to the Father for us who come along 2000 plus years later who will (shall) believe in Him. We're included, just like those who died hundreds of years before Jesus was born, but who believed that God would one day send a Messiah to save them from their sins.

Hope I hit the right topic this time.

waynemlj
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
Can a individual resit "Grace"?
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
Yep!
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
I agree Michael that is the correct answer but "once Saved Always " damnable doctrine teaches different.

any comment waynemlj
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
Oh, yea! Good point. (I jes couldn't resist.)
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by becauseHElives:
Can a individual resit "Grace"?

Hi becauseHelives,

I presume you are asking, "Can an individual resist "Grace"?

I'm not sure what question you're asking, but it is an intriguing one just the same.

(1) If you mean the grace of salvation God gives so that we can believe in Him and be saved, then I would respond by saying, "No!" Psalm 45:11, "You are the most handsome of the sons of men; grace is poured upon your lips; therefore, God has blessed you forever."
This suggests a permanent act by God and not one that the individual soul has any say about.

Romans 9:19b, "For who can resist his will?"

James 4:5, "Or do you suppose it is to no purpose that the Scripture says, 'He yearns jealously over the spirit that he has made to dwell in us'?"

These show God as Sovereign, no matter what man does.

(2) If you mean general grace that God gives to all men, such as the examples of righteous men and women in a person's life. I think the answer is "Yes!" We see many who do resist God's grace of love to them, and thus they suffer the punishment that God has prepared for them . . . in this life as well as in eternity.

Maybe you would like to rephrase your question?
I'd be willing to discuss this topic further with you if you want to.

waynemlj
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi Waynemlj,
Obviously you and I see some things in real different ways. I see God's word(holy spirit inspired and with its gospel message of love towards sinners) as plenty sufficient to cause conviction. I see man as having been given inherent faculties/cognative and reasoning skills wherewith in exposure to God's word he is able to realize his sin and is capable to make a personal decision to repent towards God and exercise faith towards Christ in baptism.

You see repentance and faith as "special abilities" and I see repentance towards God and faith in Jesus as required response/conditions for salvation.

Correct me if I am wrong....I assume that you see man as automatically sanctified by the "gift of faith" . I, on the other hand see man as sanctified both by the holy spirit of God and through obedience to His word.

Is'nt it amazing how we can see the world so differently when we have a different idea on how God exercises his sovereignty?

We are going to need to respect each others views if we are going to continue fellowshipping. I cannot refute the word of God on election......but I am more concerned with what someone is elected for. That way I have a way to examine my heart to see if I am in God's will.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by waynemlj:
Hi Daniel,

According to your reply, I understood that you realize that you did not choose God, but that He chose you.

He gave you the gift of faith to believe the words of Jesus regarding the Gospel of Salvation.

I certainly agree with that truth.

I wonder, though, why you replied to this topic, since you didn't really discuss it.

waynemlj

waynemlj,

I guess what you are saying waynemlj is you are a calvinist and you believe in limited grace (only for the Elect) and we believe in
Armenianism- teaches temporary grace (for all for now), And there is an end to grace

Revelation 2:21 And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not
Romans 10:17 Faith comes from hearing God’s message
James 1:18 We are made his children by his word
1 Timothy 5:12 Some cast off their faith
1 Timothy 4:1 Some turn from their faith
2 Timothy 2:18 Some have their faith overthrown by others
Romans 10:9-10 With heart believes unto righteousness; with mouth confession is made unto salvation
1 John 1:9 If we repent he is just to forgive us our sins, and cleanse us from all unrighteousness
Luke 24:47 Repentance & Remission of sins is the message of the Gospel
Deuteronomy 30:15-19 God gives us a choice between life and death
Joshua 24:15 We choose who to serve
Romans 2:4(b) not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?
Romans 6:16 Choosing sin leads to death, choosing God leads life
Proverbs 1:29 Some hate wisdom and choose not to fear God
Ezekiel 18:4 & 19-20 God says the one who does right shall live, and the one who sins shall die
Ezekiel 18:25 & 29 God is not unfair about this
Ezekiel 18:17, 21-22, & 27 Those that turn from sin will live
Hebrews 9:11-12 By his blood our salvation is secured in heaven and nothing else, it was a more perfect sacrifice
Mark 13:13(b) but he that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved
Luke 6:46 And why call me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say
Luke 13:3, 5 Except you repent ye shall likewise perish
John 5:29 Those who have done good will rise to eternal life, and those who have continued in evil will rise to judgement
John 15:6-7 Jesus says that those who stay in him will inherit and those who don’t will be thrown into the fire
Romans 2:7-9 He will give eternal life to those who persist in doing what is good, seeking after the glory and honor and immortality
2 Corinthians 7:10 God uses sorrow to turn us back to him by repentance, but sorrow without repentance still leads to death
2 Corinthians 11:2-4 I fear somehow you will be led away just as Eve was
Philippians 2:12-16 Work out your own Salvation with fear and trembling, that I may have not laboured in vain
Colossians 2:6-7 As you accepted Christ you must continue to live in obedience to him letting him change you
1 Thessalonians 4:7-8 God called us to holiness, if you despise this then your rejecting God
1 Timothy 4:1 Some shall depart from the Faith, and now follow demons and doctrine of Devils
Hebrews 2:3 How shall we escape judgement if we neglect such a great salvation
Hebrews 3:12-13 Make sure that your hearts are not evil and unbelieving, turning away from the Living God, warn everyone so that no ones is deceived by sin and their heart is hardened against God
Hebrews 6:4-6 For it is impossible to restore repentance to those who knew the truth then rejected it, recrucifying Christ to the Cross
Hebrews 10:26-27 If we willfully sin after receiving the truth, there remains no more sacrifice for sins
Hebrews 12:17 Esau lost what could have been his, he cried bitterly for it, but it was too late for repentance
James 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves
2 Peter 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:
2 Peter 2:20-21 For someone who was saved then returns to the world, it would have been better to not have responded the first time
2 Peter 3:15-18 Don’t misunderstand the Grace Paul preached about, I don’t want you to lose your secure footing
1 John 3:7-9 You must do what is right if you have God in you, if you continue in sin you belong to the devil
Jude 4-7 False teachers say with Grace you can continue in sin, but let me warn you God didn’t spare the Angels already with him
Revelation 3:5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white rainment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life
Exodus 32:33 Whosoever hath sinned against me, him will I blot out of my book
Psalms 69:28 Let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous

Teaching that we have nothing to do with our salvation such as making the choice to follow Jesus reminds me of Mormonism, Catholicism, Jehovah Witnesses, & the other Cults these teachings reduce Gods plan for our Salvation. Turning us to a mere program or cold mechanism, drawing us away from a relationship with a loving God. This also causes people to have an atmosphere of superiority about them. Their unspoken message is, “We are better than you and God loves us more, because he chose us to give us special Revelation which is true Salvation” I sure don’t think this could be from the God of the Bible. Who is love, where Jesus said He died for our sins. He did not say he died for some peoples sins, but for all.

I do believe in predestination. Jesus Christ died for all making us all predestined for salvation. But if we do not take the free gift of salvation, then we change our destiny by rejecting the only one (Jesus Christ) that died so ALL can live.


.
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
These cults that you mention all have one thing in common, works. Whether it is going around knocking on doors or attending the mass, their basic premise is works. This is not to discount the value of works, only to point out that the cults trust not in the finished work of Christ but on something that we can supposedly do for ourselves.

As far as the Scripture verses that you give, they are very good. But if you have given them as a rebuttal for Calvinism I can hardly see how these would qualify, (maybe there will be some further enlightenment). It should hardly come as any surprise that Calvinism and Armenianism coexist. Can you imagine a time when we humans were not given an opportunity to make a wrong choice? Counterfeiting is the oldest trick in the devil’s play book. Our job is to figure out which is which. And our responsibility is to follow the genuine, no matter what.

Did you know that there is only one elect? We can take a copy of the old King James Bible and look it up if you would like.

fastforward
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi fast foward,
Its nice to meet you. Im not all that versed on the differences between calvinism and arminanism, but I will tell you the difference that I see that seems drastic. Correct me if I am wrong, but does'nt calvinism teach that a man is born again and then he is is able to repent and believe?

So if I were a calvinist and I was witnessing to an unbeliever, I would'nt tell them what the apostles told the men who asked "What must I do to be saved?"...that is..... "Repent, be baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost"......I am assuming as a calvinist that I would need to tell them that they need to be born again.....but then I would have to tell them about the fine print at the bottom that says it is only possible if God chooses you to be born again.

I guess I have to say if being an arminian means to preach what the bible teaches about what we need to do in order to be saved, I lean more towards arminian. Repent, be baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
David Campbell,
These cults that you mention all have one thing in common, works. Whether it is going around knocking on doors or attending the mass, their basic premise is works. This is not to discount the value of works, only to point out that the cults trust not in the finished work of Christ but on something that we can supposedly do for ourselves.

As far as the Scripture verses that you give, they are very good. But if you have given them as a rebuttal for Calvinism I can hardly see how these would qualify, (maybe there will be some further enlightenment). It should hardly come as any surprise that Calvinism and Armenianism coexist. Can you imagine a time when we humans were not given an opportunity to make a wrong choice? Counterfeiting is the oldest trick in the devil’s play book. Our job is to figure out which is which. And our responsibility is to follow the genuine, no matter what.

Did you know that there is only one elect? We can take a copy of the old King James Bible and look it up if you would like.

fastforward

fastforward,

No I don't need you to try and show me something that is not there. You are to take the word of God as a whole and not just parts.

I see you are a Calvinist. You are welcome on this board, but you are not welcome to push Calvinism on people or turn every topic in to a debate about Calvinism.

A question for you. Are you one of the elect?

Do you believe everyone has a choice or we are just preprogrammed robots?

Or do you believe the choice of who will go to heaven or who will not go to heaven has already been made in advance?

I believe God lets us make the choice and He does not make us decide either way. That is what the entire bible is all about. Pointing people to Jesus Christ and evangelizing the world. Tell people of the good news of the gosple of Jesus Christ.

If it has all been decided before hand, then I would not see a reason to evangelize anyone because it has already been decided.


.

.
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Hi fast foward,
Its nice to meet you. Im not all that versed on the differences between calvinism and arminanism, but I will tell you the difference that I see that seems drastic. Correct me if I am wrong, but does'nt calvinism teach that a man is born again and then he is is able to repent and believe?

So if I were a calvinist and I was witnessing to an unbeliever, I would'nt tell them what the apostles told the men who asked "What must I do to be saved?"...that is..... "Repent, be baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost"......I am assuming as a calvinist that I would need to tell them that they need to be born again.....but then I would have to tell them about the fine print at the bottom that says it is only possible if God chooses you to be born again.

I guess I have to say if being an arminian means to preach what the bible teaches about what we need to do in order to be saved, I lean more towards arminian. Repent, be baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

With love in Christ, Daniel

Daniel.

Calvinist think they are the only ones that can be saved. For some reason they think they are chosen and others are just here to go to hell. Which in turn will make them believe they are better then other people. This just does not fit in with the context of the entire bible. My bible says Jesus died for all. I do not believe that Limited Atonement is correct. Jesus died for the sins of the whole world, not just for the sins of the elect. “And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2). Other verses in opposition to limited atonement are John 1:29; 3:16; 1 Timothy 2:6.

My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if ANY man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the WHOLE world. ~ 1 John 2:1-2 (KJV) Notice: (ANY and WHOLE)

The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. ~ John 1:29 (KJV)

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that WHOSOEVER believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. ~ John 3:16 (KJV) Notice: (WHOSOEVER)

For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for ALL, to be testified in due time. ~ 1 Timothy 2:5-6 (KJV) Notice: (ALL)

Question: "What is Calvinism and is it Biblical? What are the five points of Calvinism?"

Answer: The five points of Calvinism can be summarized with the letters TULIP. T stands for total depravity, U for unconditional election, L for limited atonement, I for irresistible grace, P for perseverance of the saints. Here are the definitions and Scripture references Calvinists use to defend their beliefs. Total Depravity = as a result of Adam’s fall the entire human race is affected; all humanity is dead in trespasses and sins. Man is unable to save himself (Genesis 6:5; Jeremiah 17:9; Romans 3:10-18).

Unconditional Election = Because man is dead in sin, he is unable to initiate response to God; therefore, in eternity past God elected certain people to salvation. Election and predestination are unconditional; they are not based on man’s response (Romans 8:29-30; 9:11; Ephesians 1:4-6,11-12).

Limited Atonement = Because God determined that certain ones should be saved as a result of God’s unconditional election, He determined that Christ should die for the elect alone. All whom God has elected and Christ died for will be saved (Matthew 1:21; John 10:11; 17:9; Acts 20:28; Romans 8:32; Ephesians 5:25). Irresistible Grace = Those whom God elected and Christ died for, God draws to Himself through irresistible grace. God makes man willing to come to Him. When God calls, man responds (John 6:37,44; 10:16). Perseverance of the Saints = The precise ones God has elected and drawn to Himself through the Holy Spirit will persevere in faith. None whom God has elected will be lost; they are eternally secure (John 10:27-29; Romans 8:29-30; Ephesians 1:3-14).

I believe that Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints are Biblical doctrines. Man is definitely sinful and incapable of believing in God on his own. God elects people based on His will alone – it is not based on any merit in the person chosen. All those whom God has chosen will come to faith. All those who are truly born-again will persevere in their faith. However, I do not believe that Limited Atonement is correct. Jesus died for the sins of the whole world, not just for the sins of the elect. “And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2). Other verses in opposition to limited atonement are John 1:29; 3:16; 1 Timothy 2:6.

 -


.
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
Excuse me but you never read anywhere that I confess Calvinism. Maybe you are not used to someone discussing a topic without bringing their own personal agenda to the table. You brought up the subject not me. I was just considering it.

Usually, (but not always) people who become suddenly defensive are fearful of something. I don’t really care if we discuss Calvinism or not. But I will say that oneInChrist has ask me something about it. May I address that? And if your answer is yea then you let me know how far oneInChrist and I can go.

fastforward
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
You sound like you are sure teaching calvinism to me.

No I am not fearful. I don't like false preachers or teachers and yes I will say something about it.

If you intend to teach calvinism on this message board then no I would not suggest it.

To teach that Jesus did not die for the sins of the whole world but just for some is just plain wrong.

If you want to give your views then you are welcome to take it to the

www.religion-debate.com

board where you can post your view and debat them.

I will be glad to debat there also.

You can see what I think about it by going to:

http://thechristianbbs.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=005455

I just posted there.

By the way are you going to answer my questions?

A question for you. Are you one of the elect?

Do you believe everyone has a choice or we are just preprogrammed robots?

Or do you believe the choice of who will go to heaven or who will not go to heaven has already been made in advance?



Thanks,
David


.
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
It sounds like I am teaching Calvinism because I asked you a couple of questions?

Now that is psychology in action! They have done studies where you play this word game by leaving certain letters out or even whole words out of sentences. And there is a group of people who automatically fill in the blank spaces. How is this group able to fill in the missing info? Whether the info that they fill in is correct or not does not matter, just that they have acted I find interesting.

I am not a psychology major or anything but I think they call this programming.

Let me tell you what I found interesting enough about your posting that led me to respond to it. It was not Calvinism or Armenianism per say. It was this-

“Teaching that we have nothing to do with our salvation such as making the choice to follow Jesus reminds me of Mormonism, Catholicism, Jehovah Witnesses, & the other Cults these teachings reduce Gods plan for our Salvation. Turning us to a mere program or cold mechanism, drawing us away from a relationship with a loving God. This also causes people to have an atmosphere of superiority about them. Their unspoken message is, “We are better than you and God loves us more, because he chose us to give us special Revelation which is true Salvation” I sure don’t think this could be from the God of the Bible. Who is love, where Jesus said He died for our sins. He did not say he died for some peoples sins, but for all.”

When in reality what these “cults” you speak of have in common and are totally dependent on is “works”. They have “works” salvation. And when that is pointed out it seems to bother you doesn’t it.

Your questions will be answered even though they seem a bit litmus-ee. Oh by the way do all new comers receive such warm welcomes?

fastforward
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
quote:
Correct me if I am wrong....I assume that you see man as automatically sanctified by the "gift of faith". I, on the other hand see man as sanctified both by the holy spirit of God and through obedience to His word.

I don't see how you came to the conclusion indicated in the first statement of this quote. On the second part, how are you sanctified by what you do? How are you obedient to His word but through faith.

"And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin." (Rom 14:23)

....So we see here that faith sanctifieth before you eat (which is the doing part). Therefore, one is 'having' according to the work (which is the grace) of God.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
I give up! Now I am compelled to learn about this Calvin, and this Arm thang.

quote:
Unconditional Election = Because man is dead in sin, he is unable to initiate response to God; therefore, in eternity past God elected certain people to salvation. Election and predestination are unconditional; they are not based on man’s response (Romans 8:29-30; 9:11; Ephesians 1:4-6,11-12).

Clearly, in what i see in my mind, and experience, it works like this. If God calls a man (this means election), and he doesn't receive it, it (opportunity) goes to the next man. This is why, for example, that it says "until the fullnes of the gentiles be in," so that God, in effect, fills His quota - perhaps! Maybe there is a set goal? I don't know. There is room for speculation in regard to certain passages in the word. But election does not (perhaps) mean a certain individual, in a certain place, at a certain time in history, will be the 'chosen' one who is 'elected' to the Kingdom. God doesn't 'dictate' it. I believe we have choice. But now, if you say that because He knows who will accept Him, that that is 'election', well, what can i say?

So i think that this agrees with you that limited atonement is quite incorrect! That's what i think.

Somewhere in the books, reference is made to the Spirit going to and fro in the earth searching for a heart that will acknowledge God. I am getting dull and cannot remember where until i read it again.
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi Michael,
So how do you think the sanctification process will go if we are willfully disobedient to the will of God found in the teachings and commands of Jesus? Are we going to be growing in the truth? or will we be chastised?

I dont understand why anyone would think that our obedience would have absolutely nothing to do with sanctification by the spirit. Michael, even you have spoken of the need to surrender......so what do you call that, if it isnt obedience?

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by WildB (Member # 2917) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by becauseHElives:
I agree Michael that is the correct answer but "once Saved Always " damnable doctrine teaches different.

any comment waynemlj

Once sealed always sealed till the day of redemption.

2Cor.1
[22] Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.
Eph.1
[13] In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Eph.4
[30] And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.

 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
oneinchrist,
Sorry I didn’t get back to you sooner. To answer your greeting post to me maybe we should start with the “fine print” as you say-

Isn’t there a parable that points out the fact that if you are going to war, or build a building, you should first count the cost before you begin to see if you will be able to complete your task or not?

The fact is that the “sinner’s prayer” is being used today sort of like a magic charm. The target is supposed to repeat this incantation and then good things are going to happen. The poor target is not told anything. He/she has to learn it after the fact. Part of the reason for this type of scenario is our culture.

In the book “Pilgrim’s Progress” by John Bunyan the hero Christian has a companion who turns back because the going became rough. The town’s people consider this companion to be very foolish even though they allowed him back into the town.

But all this is not what you wish to know.

fastforward
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
David Campbell,
Your questions will be answered even though they seem a bit litmus-ee. Oh by the way do all new comers receive such warm welcomes?

fastforward

No most people don't act the way you do.

As for the rest of the views you have about what I said is just your opinion. You just don't get the point.

It would be nice if you would answer at least one of the questions I ask. But I guess you just don't have the answer.


.
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
Let’s see. And what question should I answer first? Mmmmmm.

Oh, I know, the silly one first-

That Calvinists or anyone else on the planet for that matter would think that people are preprogrammed robots. What serious, fair-minded person, persons, organizations or systems of thought teach that people are preprogrammed robots? If you want to be a debater, you are going to have to do better.

Could you give me any names of people; it doesn’t have to even be Calvinists, (in order to make it easier for you) that teach such of a thing.

fastforward
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
David Campbell,
Let’s see. And what question should I answer first? Mmmmmm.

Oh, I know, the silly one first-

That Calvinists or anyone else on the planet for that matter would think that people are preprogrammed robots. What serious, fair-minded person, persons, organizations or systems of thought teach that people are preprogrammed robots? If you want to be a debater, you are going to have to do better.

Could you give me any names of people; it doesn’t have to even be Calvinists, (in order to make it easier for you) that teach such of a thing.

fastforward

You did not answer my question. If you want to continue with your smart mouth then you WILL BE BANNED.


The questions:

Are you one of the elect?


.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
What is up fastforward? What do you believe, or who do you agree with here? I must've missed a post somewhere because i don't see the challenge that has been presented. Just curious on where you stand. You are not a cultist, i assume. What is your confidence on the salvation issue?
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Hi fastfoward,
Thank you for the response. I had to go a few posts back to see how things began. I can see how tensions arise over some of these issues.
As far as calvinism and armenianism co-existing......I would disagree in the sense that these man-made doctrines cannot both be as truthful and accurate as the bible.
What I really believe in my heart that we need to do in order to establish a greater unity in the faith of Jesus Christ is to discover how it is that "seemingly" opposing scriptures co-exist without causing contadiction to the consistency of God's Word and Gods character.
We really need to be comparing scripure with scripture.....in the same way that the bereans did to affirm the truth of Christ as the prophecied messiah. For Ex: How is it for instance that scriptures like "By the grace of God are ye saved through faith, and that not of yourself; it is the gift of God......and.... "He that endures to the end shall be saved" both true?
I really believe that one of the biggest problems is that some people are just not willing to work/study together. I believe that we all need to remain teachable.

Instead of a calvinist vs. an armenian, a calvinist should take a scripture that he uses to support his opposing view and the armenian should take a scripture that he uses to support his opposing view and they both should study together(the hardest part to achieve) to see how it is that both scriptures can co-exist in harmony without contradicting the consistency of Gods truth or His character. We should flee the tendency to favor particular sciptures over other ones because of a particular interpretation that we like. In the end everyone is not going to agree on everything, but we all should at least agree to what Christ calls us to if we are to be one of His disciples.

Oh yes, and by the way, I do agree that "counting the cost" is likened unto "fine print" that is often overlooked or even purposely left out. We need to hear those things though......we need to know what to expect in the faith so that we are not easily overtaken in surprise when the trials come.
Press on my friend. Jesus is Lord.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
Your question is answered. Calvinists, Armenians, Roman Catholics, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Mormons etc, etc as far as I know do not believe, nor do they teach that humans are preprogrammed robots.

So where do you get the preprogrammed robot terminology?

As far as your question about the “elect” is concerned, I offered to look it up with you in the old King James Bible but you said that I could not show you anything, remember. So if you don’t want me to show you anything then what exactly are you getting at, (maybe justification for your latest threat)?

If a person wants respect the easiest way to go about receiving some is by giving some. (But I don’t play games. If you want to continue this discussion you will have to stop with less than honest accusations concerning those that just may differ with you.)

fastforward
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
I don't like playing games either.

Please answer my question.


>>>>> Are you one of the elect? <<<<<


A simple yes or no.

Seems you are the one playing games.

Calvinists = preprogrammed robots belief.

They teach you don't have a choice, no free will.

That makes one a robot.

.
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David Campbell:
quote:
Originally posted by waynemlj:
Hi Daniel,

According to your reply, I understood that you realize that you did not choose God, but that He chose you.

He gave you the gift of faith to believe the words of Jesus regarding the Gospel of Salvation.

I certainly agree with that truth.

I wonder, though, why you replied to this topic, since you didn't really discuss it.

waynemlj

waynemlj,

I guess what you are saying waynemlj is you are a calvinist and you believe in limited grace (only for the Elect) and we believe in
Armenianism- teaches temporary grace (for all for now), And there is an end to grace

Revelation 2:21 And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not
Romans 10:17 Faith comes from hearing God’s message
James 1:18 We are made his children by his word
1 Timothy 5:12 Some cast off their faith
1 Timothy 4:1 Some turn from their faith
2 Timothy 2:18 Some have their faith overthrown by others
Romans 10:9-10 With heart believes unto righteousness; with mouth confession is made unto salvation
1 John 1:9 If we repent he is just to forgive us our sins, and cleanse us from all unrighteousness
Luke 24:47 Repentance & Remission of sins is the message of the Gospel
Deuteronomy 30:15-19 God gives us a choice between life and death
Joshua 24:15 We choose who to serve
Romans 2:4(b) not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?
Romans 6:16 Choosing sin leads to death, choosing God leads life
Proverbs 1:29 Some hate wisdom and choose not to fear God
Ezekiel 18:4 & 19-20 God says the one who does right shall live, and the one who sins shall die
Ezekiel 18:25 & 29 God is not unfair about this
Ezekiel 18:17, 21-22, & 27 Those that turn from sin will live
Hebrews 9:11-12 By his blood our salvation is secured in heaven and nothing else, it was a more perfect sacrifice
Mark 13:13(b) but he that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved
Luke 6:46 And why call me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say
Luke 13:3, 5 Except you repent ye shall likewise perish
John 5:29 Those who have done good will rise to eternal life, and those who have continued in evil will rise to judgement
John 15:6-7 Jesus says that those who stay in him will inherit and those who don’t will be thrown into the fire
Romans 2:7-9 He will give eternal life to those who persist in doing what is good, seeking after the glory and honor and immortality
2 Corinthians 7:10 God uses sorrow to turn us back to him by repentance, but sorrow without repentance still leads to death
2 Corinthians 11:2-4 I fear somehow you will be led away just as Eve was
Philippians 2:12-16 Work out your own Salvation with fear and trembling, that I may have not laboured in vain
Colossians 2:6-7 As you accepted Christ you must continue to live in obedience to him letting him change you
1 Thessalonians 4:7-8 God called us to holiness, if you despise this then your rejecting God
1 Timothy 4:1 Some shall depart from the Faith, and now follow demons and doctrine of Devils
Hebrews 2:3 How shall we escape judgement if we neglect such a great salvation
Hebrews 3:12-13 Make sure that your hearts are not evil and unbelieving, turning away from the Living God, warn everyone so that no ones is deceived by sin and their heart is hardened against God
Hebrews 6:4-6 For it is impossible to restore repentance to those who knew the truth then rejected it, recrucifying Christ to the Cross
Hebrews 10:26-27 If we willfully sin after receiving the truth, there remains no more sacrifice for sins
Hebrews 12:17 Esau lost what could have been his, he cried bitterly for it, but it was too late for repentance
James 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves
2 Peter 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:
2 Peter 2:20-21 For someone who was saved then returns to the world, it would have been better to not have responded the first time
2 Peter 3:15-18 Don’t misunderstand the Grace Paul preached about, I don’t want you to lose your secure footing
1 John 3:7-9 You must do what is right if you have God in you, if you continue in sin you belong to the devil
Jude 4-7 False teachers say with Grace you can continue in sin, but let me warn you God didn’t spare the Angels already with him
Revelation 3:5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white rainment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life
Exodus 32:33 Whosoever hath sinned against me, him will I blot out of my book
Psalms 69:28 Let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous

Teaching that we have nothing to do with our salvation such as making the choice to follow Jesus reminds me of Mormonism, Catholicism, Jehovah Witnesses, & the other Cults these teachings reduce Gods plan for our Salvation. Turning us to a mere program or cold mechanism, drawing us away from a relationship with a loving God. This also causes people to have an atmosphere of superiority about them. Their unspoken message is, “We are better than you and God loves us more, because he chose us to give us special Revelation which is true Salvation” I sure don’t think this could be from the God of the Bible. Who is love, where Jesus said He died for our sins. He did not say he died for some peoples sins, but for all.

I do believe in predestination. Jesus Christ died for all making us all predestined for salvation. But if we do not take the free gift of salvation, then we change our destiny by rejecting the only one (Jesus Christ) that died so ALL can live.


.

Hi David,

All of the quotes you posted here are true. They are God's inerrant, holy Word to us. None of them prove that Christ came to this earth to die for all men, though.

Let me speak to the last section I pasted here for easy reference:
"I do believe in predestination. Jesus Christ died for all making us all predestined for salvation. But if we do not take the free gift of salvation, then we change our destiny by rejecting the only one (Jesus Christ) that died so ALL can live."

Your first sentence tells me that you believe in predestination. So do I.
However, I see a giant leap between that statement and your next one. You assume in your second sentence above that Christ died for all men. By doing that you redefine the meaning of predestination to prove what you want to prove.

The dictionary defines predestination (Theology) as the relegation of all souls to either salvation or damnation by this act.
Yes, God is sovereign and decides all things. You and I draw our next breath because He sovereignly ordains it.

The Father and the Son made a covenant we are told in John 17 and in sundry other places, including Romans 9:22-24,27, "What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory . . . (27)"And Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: Though the number of the sons of Israel be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant of them will be saved." The idea of a remnant for salvation is all through the Old Testament.

Here we see the idea of predestination to include those who are chosen to be damned as well as those who are chosen to be saved.

We humans like to focus on the love and mercy of God who sent His Son to save everyone. We are too slow to look straight at God's terrible hatred of sin which the Bible calls God's wrath!

Since Jesus came to give His life for His Church, which He says He will build "and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it," how can we possible conclude that ALL are included in His Church. That's simply not biblical as we see from the Scriptures I've included here.

If anyone still argues that He intended to die for all men, then that man's theology is in deep trouble. It would naturally lead him to the conclusion that Jesus failed in His mission and His glorious Incarnation, Holy Life, Suffering and Death and Resurrection were not good enough to save ALL men that He intended to save.

That's not a biblical conclusion at all.
John 10:28-29, "I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand."

I see in that Scripture the glorious assurance that He accomplished exactly what He was predestined to accomplish.

I thank Him evey day for "so great a salvation" which I know I certainly did not deserve.

It makes me want to tell everyone what Jesus has done for me and that He can do the same for them. I do not guarantee the results either way. God does as He determines in His righteousness!

Limited atonement means justification forever for those predestined by God's Sovereign knowledge and Justice and Mercy.

waynemlj
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
So you made it up.

fastforward
 
Posted by oneinchrist (Member # 6532) on :
 
Jesus died for all sin, the difference is
that some peoples sin will be held against them and some peoples sin wont be.

There are some people that believe that since Jesus died for the sins of the world that everyone must be saved then......but I dont believe that anyone on this site thinks that way....that I know of.

With love in Christ, Daniel
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by oneinchrist:
Unrepentant hearts and unbelief are both more linked with our own rebellion and disobedience than anything else. If we were to say that repentance and faith are 100% hand-outs, then we would have to at least associate God with the cause for the sin of unbelief and rebellion of the lost, because God left them that way. That I am not willing to do.

Waynem, I respect your position, but do not agree with it. You hold to a particular theology that takes a small number of scriptures to back it up. Though I cannot dispute the scriptures you use, I can dispute the way that you view them and try to make a case. If I am accused of not believing in predestination, that is a false accusation. I believe in it.....but I question how some perceive it. To go as far as to say that man has absolutely nothing to do with his salvation I strongly oppose. I will also continue to believe that faith involves consent of the will otherwise we are just left with a mental assent to bible facts with no intent on acting on them.

For most of my life I was a believer, ever since I was a young child I was taught the 10 Commandments and all the fun bible stories up to Jesus. I believed in God. But it was'nt until 1995 that a bible believing man came into my life and I found myself to be a hypocrite. God's will for my life was not my concern and I had a passive attitude towards sin. I was in rebellion. I had never repented so I was an unrepentant believer......sounds like an oxymoron, but it is'nt. My believing was hypocritical because I had never come to God in sincere repentance for my rebellion to him. I was lost and never even had the spirit of God. By Gods grace He was patient and waited for me to realize that I was still in my sin and that I needed to repent. I thank him for bringing that bible-believing man into my life to help show me my real status. I was left with a decision to make: Repent, turn from my sin and position of rebellion to God and turn to God and His will for my life or just continue on living my same old life. To make a long story short I ended up repenting and then going to be baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus and sometime afterwards the Holy Spirit began to be a more identifiable part of my life.

In conclusion, I see God as providing the way and waiting on a satisfactory response from us. When He is satisfied with our response then the Holy Spirit comes into our lives and helps us to transform into Christ-likeness. Then we would become born-again....not born-again first and then repentance and faith towards Christ.

Acts 5:32 And we are His witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.

With love in Christ, Daniel

___________________________________________

Hi Daniel,

Back to the computer.

I'll reply to your conlusion in order to save time here.
Your words I have pasted here:

"In conclusion, I see God as providing the way and waiting on a satisfactory response from us. When He is satisfied with our response then the Holy Spirit comes into our lives and helps us to transform into Christ-likeness. Then we would become born-again....not born-again first and then repentance and faith towards Christ.'

Your first sentence makes your salvation and mine dependent on our own power to choose to believe.
That makes it a salvation of works that you and I can boast about. That's not what the Bible reveals, at all.

Look carefully with me at Ephesians 2:1-10, "And you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which you once walked, following the course of the world, following the prince of the power of the air . . . and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. But God, being rich in mercy . . . (8) For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."

I see here in the above Scripture (please read all ten verses) that God does it all. You and I were running away from Him in the opposite direction to utter damnation for all eternity.

For reasons that you and I and the rest of the saved souls cannot understand or even should meddle with the attempt, God stopped us from destroying our precious souls and gave us a heart of flesh (Ezekiel 11:19) so that He could give us the gift of faith to believe in Jesus as our Savior.

We did Nothing! What we did After He gave us a regenerated heart by the Holy Spirit and the Gift of Faith is that we believed.
On our own, we were dead spiritually. How does a dead man bring himself to spiritual life? He's dead, remember.

Have I answered what you needed to know? If there's still more needed, let me know. I love to talk with you about God's Word.

Just think! We are destined to be sinless one day and to share in the Glory of Jesus Christ and the Father and Holy Spirit forever and ever and ever. . . !

Praise be to God!

waynemlj
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
No I did not say everyone was saved.

- - - - - - -

Here are some links for those that want to know the truth about calvinism:

http://heresies.landmarkbiblebaptist.net/calvinism.htm

http://www.biblelife.org/calvinism.htm

http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/davehunt-calvinrefutation.html


.
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
The truth? We could just as easily discuss the “truth” of Armenianism-

The truth is that when some of us discuss Calvinism, immediately it is taken to the extreme (example-“preprogrammed robots”). So in all fairness we should be able to take Armenianism to the extreme for just a moment.

Taken to the extreme Armenianism becomes works based salvation which is no salvation.

(Am I sensing a little hair tingling on the backs of some of the readers after this last?)

fastforward
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
Yahweh gives me the power to make a choice without a doubt this is a true statement...

but if then I am not at liberty to make a free will decision of acceptance or rejection of Salvation through the Atonement of Yeshua's Blood then Yahweh is just a tyrant forcing those He choices to become His robots.

Yahweh only desires those that choose to accept His gift because of love because He loved first and they want to obey His commands and live by His precepts because they love Him.

no duty or legal requirements just a free choice to love Him , love Him for all He has done.
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
Sola Scriptura
Sola Gratia
Sola Fide
Sola Christus
Sola Deo Gloria
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
The truth? We could just as easily discuss the “truth” of Armenianism-

The truth is that when some of us discuss Calvinism, immediately it is taken to the extreme (example-“preprogrammed robots”). So in all fairness we should be able to take Armenianism to the extreme for just a moment.

Taken to the extreme Armenianism becomes works based salvation which is no salvation.

(Am I sensing a little hair tingling on the backs of some of the readers after this last?)

fastforward

Not from me. First of all I am neither a Calvinist nor an Arminian. I am a follower of Jesus Christ. I know one thing for sure. You can be the ism you want to be, but if you don’t know Jesus Christ you are on your way to hell.


.
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
Amen David
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
One scripture, One Christ: Can you translate that fafo? I didn't get some parts.

So, in the name of brotherly love, why would you want to tingle someone's hair? Do you desire to provoke (unless it is one's thoughts, or love)? Is that Christ? Are you Christ's? Does whatever it is matter? Are you a participant, or would you scatter? How are you fafo? Everything ok?

(Don't give place to the enemy.)
 
Posted by Carol Swenson (Member # 6929) on :
 
All this is from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting men’s sins against them. And He has committed to us the message of reconciliation. (2 Corinthians 5:18-19, NIV)
 
Posted by jiggyfly (Member # 6972) on :
 
Amen Carol, Father is reconciling all, meaning everyone, to Himself through Christ. Which is why both Calvinism and Arminianism are both in error. They both teach an eternal damnation or Hell.
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by becauseHElives:
Yahweh gives me the power to make a choice without a doubt this is a true statement...

but if then I am not at liberty to make a free will decision of acceptance or rejection of Salvation through the Atonement of Yeshua's Blood then Yahweh is just a tyrant forcing those He choices to become His robots.

Yahweh only desires those that choose to accept His gift because of love because He loved first and they want to obey His commands and live by His precepts because they love Him.

no duty or legal requirements just a free choice to love Him , love Him for all He has done.

Hi becauseHelives

I just happened to be going back over this thread and saw your statement which I'll paste here for easy reference to comment on:
"but if then I am not at liberty to make a free will decision of acceptance or rejection of Salvation through the Atonement of Yeshua's Blood then Yahweh is just a tyrant forcing those He choices to become His robots."

If you find it distasteful to be one of God's robots there are a couple of facts I'd like to remind you of.

1) Paul calls himself, happily, a "prisoner of Jesus Christ," Philemon 1:1 and in sundry other salutations in his epistles.

2)Think of the alternative: you were a slave to sin and Satan before you were saved.

3)Read through carefully Ephesians 2:1-10 and see the reality of the fallen nature we all inherited.
Dead men don't bring themselves to life so that they can "choose" God.

No one chooses God until the Holy Spirit rebirth's the spiritually dead soul so that it can receive the gift of faith, repent, and be saved. Romans 3:10-11, "None is righteous, no, not one;
no one understands;
no one seeks for God."

No, I don't think we are robots. I know that we have been set free to "belong" to God's family through the saving work of Jesus Christ on the cross . . . and that's forever and ever and ever...

I praise God for you and me and all who believe!

waynemlj
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
waynemlj,
This type of argument here really doesn’t make sense to me. You don’t think that those you address are well versed on this subject, (at least they think they are)? I guarantee you that there has been a lot of practice bringing canned answers to the ready here at this site, (this is the reason for the impatience shown for this subject).

I am going to take a chance and look at your post for a moment, (even though we are treading on thin ice).

Will you agree that both systems are not without their respective problems?

fastforward
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jiggyfly:
Amen Carol, Father is reconciling all, meaning everyone, to Himself through Christ. Which is why both Calvinism and Arminianism are both in error. They both teach an eternal damnation or Hell.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Well that part is not in error. Hell is eternal! And this will not be debated on this message board. It is a fact. So don't even go there.

Studies show that over 90% of people in the world believe in a "heaven" while less than 50% believe in an eternal hell. According to the Bible, hell is most definitely real! The punishment of the wicked in hell is as never-ending as the bliss of the righteous in Heaven. The punishment of the wicked dead in hell is described throughout Scripture as "everlasting fire" (Matthew 25:41), "unquenchable fire" (Matthew 3:12), "shame and everlasting contempt" (Daniel 12:2), a place where "their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched" (Mark 9:44-49), a place of "torments" and "flame" (Luke 16:23,24), "everlasting destruction" (2 Thessalonians 1:9), a place of torment with "fire and brimstone" where "the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever" (Revelation 14:10,11), and a "lake of fire and brimstone" where the wicked are "tormented day and night forever and ever" (Revelation 20:10). Jesus Himself indicates that the punishment in hell itself is everlasting - not merely the smoke and flames (Matthew 25:46).

The wicked are forever subject to the fury and the wrath of God in hell. They consciously suffer shame and contempt and the assaults of an accusing conscience -- along with the fiery wrath of an offended deity -- for all of eternity. Even those in hell will acknowledge the perfect justice of God (Psalms 76:10). Those who are in the very real hell will know that their punishment is just and that they alone are to blame (Deuteronomy 32:3-5). Yes, hell is real. Yes, hell is a place of torment and punishment that lasts forever and ever, with no end! Praise God that through Jesus, we can escape this eternal fate (John 3:16,18,36).


.
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
waynemlj,
This type of argument here really doesn’t make sense to me. You don’t think that those you address are well versed on this subject, (at least they think they are)? I guarantee you that there has been a lot of practice bringing canned answers to the ready here at this site, (this is the reason for the impatience shown for this subject).

I am going to take a chance and look at your post for a moment, (even though we are treading on thin ice).

Will you agree that both systems are not without their respective problems?

fastforward

fastforward,

Before I ban you from this message board. I will tell you now if you continue to put people down on this message board you are going to be banned without any farther notice.

So be careful how you reply to this message.

If you don't like the company here I suggest you just leave.

Thank you,
David


.
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
.

>>> If you find it distasteful to be one of God's robots there are a couple of facts I'd like to remind you of.


First of all no one that believes in freewill and not calvinism, would not be considered a robot.

Robots do as programed such as calvinism teaches that they do not have a choice. Therefore they are programed to do as told.

I follow the Lord Jesus Christ because I know what He has done for us and I love him and want to follow Him.

All are call to come to God not just calvinist. Many do not heed the call and let their hearts become hard. But they were called.

The elect answer the call because they receive the good news that Jesus Christ came and died so they might live.


.
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
.


It would be nice if one of the calvinist would answer the question I have ask over and over.


Are you one of the elect?


Since we have decided to discuss this topic. I would like to be able to ask questions also.

.
 
Posted by jiggyfly (Member # 6972) on :
 
I used to believe eternal hell was fact too David. I won't argue about it but I challenge you to study it out for yourself referencing back to the original Greek text and not English translations. study the wGreek word aion and aionios. You might be surprised.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
What is this? Now hell is not real? What then is then meaning of Lazurus and the Great Gulf between where he was, and the redeemed? (Mercy.)
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jiggyfly:
I used to believe eternal hell was fact too David. I won't argue about it but I challenge you to study it out for yourself referencing back to the original Greek text and not English translations. study the wGreek word aion and aionios. You might be surprised.

I have already studied it and you are not the first one to come to this message board with that false teaching. So don't bring it here.

Thank you,
David

.
 
Posted by jiggyfly (Member # 6972) on :
 
really didn't suspect you would act like Jonah or the prodigal's brother but tis your forum and your rules and your facts. Good bye
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jiggyfly:
really didn't suspect you would act like Jonah or the prodigal's brother but tis your forum and your rules and your facts. Good bye

Good bye.

[wave3]

.
 
Posted by Carol Swenson (Member # 6929) on :
 
jiggyfly...

quote:
Originally posted by jiggyfly:
Amen Carol, Father is reconciling all, meaning everyone, to Himself through Christ. Which is why both Calvinism and Arminianism are both in error. They both teach an eternal damnation or Hell.

I didn't say that. Hell is real and eternal. This is not what that verse means. David doesn't want it debated, but I just want to clear up this misunderstanding about what you thought I said!
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
I would be glad to answer your question if you quit with the threats. But if not then what would be the use?

fastforward
 
Posted by Eden (Member # 5728) on :
 
Dear fastforward, the best way to remain on the board if the members of this board interest you, is to avoid Topics that David Campbell thinks are harmful to the church, in his own opinion, as owner of this board.

Let the matter be a bitter book in your stomach if it has to, but please continue to share the wonderful things that you have learned in Christ Jesus of Nazareth.

with love, eden
 
Posted by Eden (Member # 5728) on :
 
Hi, Carol Swenson. You said to Michael Harrison
quote:
Hi Michael,

In your honest opinion, would you say that I have a speech impediment?

Dear Carol Swenson, it is hard to tell from typed answers whether you have a speech impediment.

But if you do have a speech impediment, I don't see how a speech impediment could prevent your fingers from typing to the LORD, that you should not be like Moses by the burning bush?

Hello, typing is a God-sent for someone who has a speech impediment, isn't it? [roll on floor]

love, eden

"and every knee shall bow to Him, including the knees of Christians", but if we kneel before Him now, then we will know how to kneel before Him then"
 
Posted by waynemlj (Member # 7041) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
waynemlj,
This type of argument here really doesn’t make sense to me. You don’t think that those you address are well versed on this subject, (at least they think they are)? I guarantee you that there has been a lot of practice bringing canned answers to the ready here at this site, (this is the reason for the impatience shown for this subject).

I am going to take a chance and look at your post for a moment, (even though we are treading on thin ice).

Will you agree that both systems are not without their respective problems?

fastforward

Hi fastforward,

Could you help me to understand what your question refers to?

I lost the background somewhere along the way.

waynemlj
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
David Campbell,
I would be glad to answer your question if you quit with the threats. But if not then what would be the use?

fastforward

>>> Are you one of the elect? <<<


Yes or No


.
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
This debate thing is not a new problem here. That is why I put up the following message board. If you don't like the rules here you can go that and debate anything as long as it is not X rated.

www.christianity-debate.com
or
www.religion-debate.com

If you are offended easy don't go there.

There are few rules and it is open to everyone.

NOTE: You will have to sign up again as it is separate from this message board.

Thanks,
David
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
I never meant to ignore the christianity-debate site, but somehow i ended up doing so. I don't remember if i know who i am over there, not to mention my password? [Razz]

That'ud be a good place to debate that C al dude! Maybe there could be a dedicated forum to that very subject? I dunno! Thanks and God Bless!

By the way, i panicked this morning when I tried to get on and it said that advanced member #7401, which is not my number, didn't exist. Thought i had been booted, praise God.

Oh, and thanks for the great bbs site!
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
I went to the race track here in Charlotte once for the big event. Everybody was chanting "Anybody but Waltrip." Darryl Waltrip was doing well, and actually won it. When he was in the winner's circle where the podium was, he took the microphone, and in anger stated, "Alright! I'll meet every one of you in the parking lot!" He wasn't happy about what everybody was saying. Well, I'll meet every one of you at christianity-debate forum! [thumbsup2]
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
I won’t answer your question under direst. If you will stop your threats then I will answer. I said before that I don’t care if we discuss this subject or not. I am not pursuing this subject. But I am willing to discuss it with anyone in fairness.

fastforward
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
waynemlj,
It seems like you are giving standard arguments. Then the other side will respond in kind.

As to my direct question-
Will you agree that both sides of the debate have difficulties yet to overcome?

fastforward
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
David Campbell,
I won’t answer your question under direst. If you will stop your threats then I will answer. I said before that I don’t care if we discuss this subject or not. I am not pursuing this subject. But I am willing to discuss it with anyone in fairness.

fastforward

I have not made any threats. If you don't want to answer that is fine with me.

I have not had a calvinist answer it yet so no big deal.

.
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
waynemlj,
It seems like you are giving standard arguments. Then the other side will respond in kind.

As to my direct question-
Will you agree that both sides of the debate have difficulties yet to overcome?

fastforward

waynemlj is no longer on this message board.

See:

http://thechristianbbs.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=005465;p=1#000003


.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
Yes David, but even better!

Gal 4:5 To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.
Gal 4:6 And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.
Gal 4:7 Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.

That is far from robotic. (Can i say that? You seem a little antsey.)
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
It is true that you have had no luck getting someone to answer your important question. OK you have made no threats. And you and I will no longer be discussing Calvin/Arminius. Thanks so much David Campbell.

fastforward

For those Calvinist left I give you this advice-

“If you’re going to tell people the truth you’d better make them laugh; otherwise they’ll kill you.”
George Bernard Shaw

Disclaimer: In order to keep from being misunderstood, the above quote is just a bit of irony, (not intended for theological use).
 
Posted by CWO4GUNNER (Member # 6971) on :
 
Christ showed great compassion and preached the good news to almost everyone he encountered when he was on earth, to the lost, tax collectors, wine drinkers, fornicators, adulterers , prostitutes, the sick, the old, the insane, and even the dead. But he had no compassion on those professing to know the truth, and rather teaching the doctrines of men and their father the devil. In fact the scriptures show us Christ, John the baptist and Paul were belligerent and sarcastic toward those who spread lies about Gods word and desperately go around the church trying to collect the souls of the lost and weak.
If the saints were here today, and of course in God's due time they will be, they would make short work of them all because they are worse then the lost. Professing the lies of Calvinism they slink around the body of Christ seeking out where they can inflict wounds by peddling the same type of twisted scripture Satan offered in the Garden, who unwittingly is their adopted father. If there is anyone predestined for destruction these are surly at the top of Gods list.
Oh by the Holy Spirit that stirs within me over this issue, I pray that God will bring upon their heads starting today the measure of the plagues written in the word of God for teaching seductive lies to the lost and snatching the truth from the harts of new believers(their quest). Most Holy God I pray for the sake of those who have been drawn here by the Holy Spirit from all corners of the world to fellowship in this place with you in truth and in spirit. I pray Oh God that this heresy preached so shamelessly with blatant disregard for the truth of "The Way" and in preparation for the Antichrist, I pray that all of this evil be be pushed back from this place so that those that know you and bear living fruit of the spirit may fellowship in this place in peace and in truth Amen.
[Prayer]

"I know your deeds and your toil and perseverance, and that you cannot tolerate evil men, and you put to the test those who call themselves apostles, and they are not, and you found them to be false; and you have perseverance and have endured for My name's sake, and have not grown weary. But I have this against you, that you have left your first love. Therefore remember from where you have fallen, and repent and do the deeds you did at first; or else I am coming to you and will remove your lampstand out of its place--unless you repent. Yet this you do have, that you hate the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.
He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches To him who overcomes, I will grant to eat of the tree of life which is in the Paradise of God."
Revelation 2: 2-7

Idiomatic rendering of the Original Greek Texts
He who is overcoming -- "this one" -- shall be arrayed in white garments, and I will not blot out his name from the scroll of the life, and I will confess his name before my Father, and before His messengers. revelations 3:5

Without authority, I merely quote you Christian message board rule #1
"We do not promote the prosperity gospel preachers on this message board. You may not teach any false gospel. There will be no warning from here on, you will just be removed from this message board. This is not debatable."

 
Posted by WildB (Member # 2917) on :
 
For the baseball fans, what is Calvinism ?
 
Posted by WildB (Member # 2917) on :
 
I found ths on the web.

What is Calvinism and is it Biblical? What are the five points of Calvinism?

five points of Calvinism


Question: "What is Calvinism and is it Biblical? What are the five points of Calvinism?"

Answer: The five points of Calvinism can be summarized by the acronym TULIP. T stands for total depravity, U for unconditional election, L for limited atonement, I for irresistible grace, and P for perseverance of the saints. Here are the definitions and Scripture references Calvinists use to defend their beliefs.

Total Depravity - as a result of Adam’s fall the entire human race is affected; all humanity is dead in trespasses and sins. Man is unable to save himself (Genesis 6:5; Jeremiah 17:9; Romans 3:10-18).

Unconditional Election - Because man is dead in sin, he is unable to initiate response to God; therefore, in eternity past God elected certain people to salvation. Election and predestination are unconditional; they are not based on man’s response (Romans 8:29-30; 9:11; Ephesians 1:4-6,11-12) because man is unable to respond, nor does he want to.

Limited Atonement - Because God determined that certain ones should be saved as a result of God’s unconditional election, He determined that Christ should die for the elect alone. All whom God has elected and Christ died for will be saved (Matthew 1:21; John 10:11; 17:9; Acts 20:28; Romans 8:32; Ephesians 5:25).

Irresistible Grace - Those whom God elected and Christ died for, God draws to Himself through irresistible grace. God makes man willing to come to Him. When God calls, man responds (John 6:37,44; 10:16).

Perseverance of the Saints - The precise ones God has elected and drawn to Himself through the Holy Spirit will persevere in faith. None whom God has elected will be lost; they are eternally secure (John 10:27-29; Romans 8:29-30; Ephesians 1:3-14).

While all these doctrines have a biblical basis, many people reject all or some of them. So-called “four point Calvinists” accept Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints as biblical doctrines. Man is definitely sinful and incapable of believing in God on his own. God elects people based on His will alone – it is not based on any merit in the person chosen. All those whom God has chosen will come to faith. All those who are truly born-again will persevere in their faith. As for Limited Atonement, however, four-point Calvinists believe that atonement in unlimited, arguing that Jesus died for the sins of the whole world, not just for the sins of the elect. “And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2). Other verses in opposition to limited atonement are John 1:29; 3:16; 1 Timothy 2:6; 2 Peter 2:1.

The five-point Calvinists, however, see problems with four-point Calvinism. First, they argue, if Total Depravity is true, then Limited Atonement cannot possibly be true because if Jesus died for the sins of every person, then whether or not His death is applicable to an individual depends on whether or not that person “accepts” Christ. But as we have seen from the above description of Total Depravity, man in his natural state has no capacity whatsoever to choose God, nor does he want to. In addition, if Unlimited Atonement is true, then hell is full of people for whom Christ died and He shed His blood in vain for them. To the five-point Calvinist, this is unthinkable. Please note - this article is only a brief summary of the five points of Calvinism.

http://www.gotquestions.org/calvinism.html
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
According to Calvin: God has predestined to save a certain group of people; these are called God's Elect. God's sovereign will for His elect cannot be resisted or thwarted as His irresistible grace ensures that all of them will willingly accept Jesus Christ, at some point in their lives before they die. The Non-Elect cannot come to Christ because natural fallen man is totally sinful and depraved. Salvation is entirely the work of God from start to finish. All believers (the Elect) will go to heaven, but all unbelievers (the Non-Elect) will be judged and cast into the Lake of Fire (hell), where they will be tortured forever.


.
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
WildB,
Thanks for the website.
There is also a guy named Jacob Arminius that you may find interesting. Arminius developed a system of Christian thought on the same order as Calvin but the two systems are sort of “anti” each other. As a matter of fact most of Protestantism can be divided using the two respective systems. Partly that is because these two men were much involved in the early reformation movement. Surprisingly not much has changed since these two systems crystallized. If I were going to make a guess, I would say that this site would not fall under the Calvin banner.

I do have a question for you WildB. That is if you have the time and would like to converse with me for a while. In another thread you were saying something about “once sealed” or something like that, (forgive my memory). I did not understand what you were getting at. Do you remember and are you willing to repeat here at this thread.

Thanks WildB, sorry to bother you,
fastforward
 
Posted by WildB (Member # 2917) on :
 
Once SEALED, SEALED until the day of REDEMTION.
(Eph.4[30])
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
WildB,
If I were going to make a guess, I would say that this site would not fall under the Calvin banner. fastforward

You are correct. It does not fall under the Arminius banner either.

This message board is for followers of Jesus Christ not Calvin or Arminius.

You can discuss this subject with out trying to point your finger in someones face. If you are going to discuss it be nice.

Thank you,
David

.
 
Posted by CHEWY (Member # 6970) on :
 
David-

I will bite. Yes I am one of God's elect.

Chewy-
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
WildB,
Thanks.
If you cared to look at my little profile here at this site you will see trucking listed. In the good old U.S. of A. we ship more goods by truck than any other country in the world. And on the backs of all those truck trailers are placed these seals. Only authorized personnel can legally break the seals and only when they reach their destination, (excepting upon some sort of catastrophe and even then it is still only authorized personnel just a different set).

It was good talking to you WildB,
Fastforward
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
David Campbell,
Everything is a race to the bottom with you. Let’s see…
What verse comes to mind this time?
Ah, here it is-
II Cor. 11:6
Yes that will do nicely.
One of the “main” knocks against Paul was his “rough” talk, (even now the girls don’t like his “feminist” ways). But as he continues in the verse he always had an answer, probably because as he mentions at the end of the verse, he understood well whom he was dealing with.

So maybe there is a verse or two that we can compare you with-
We don’t have to go very far, just a few pages back where Paul says in I Cor. 1:12-
“Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apolios; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.”

And of that bunch I think the “super” saint liked to point out that he was of Christ.

fastforward
 
Posted by Carol Swenson (Member # 6929) on :
 
1 Corinthians 1:10

Now, dear brothers and sisters, I appeal to you by the authority of the Lord Jesus Christ to stop arguing among yourselves. Let there be real harmony so there won’t be divisions in the church. I plead with you to be of one mind, united in thought and purpose. (NLT )

1 Corinthians 1:12-13

What I mean is this: One of you says, “I follow Paul”; another, “I follow Apollos”; another, “I follow Cephas”; still another, “I follow Christ.” Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized into the name of Paul? (NIV)

Paul used a series of rhetorical questions. First he asked whether Christ could be divided. This is a graphic picture of what happens when the church (the body of Christ) quarrels and argues. Christ is one; the church is one. No church ought to split into warring factions. Then Paul asked if he, himself, had been crucified for them. Again the answer is obviously no. Only One had been crucified for the believers—indeed, only One could be crucified to pay the penalty for sins. Third question: Were the believers baptized into the name of Paul (or even of Peter or Apollos)? Again, the answer was no. They were baptized into the name of the One who had been crucified for them. This whole idea of factions was wrong; Paul did not exempt those who desired to follow him, nor did he point out any flaws in the teachings of Peter and Apollos. They all taught the same thing—the gospel—but their demeanor and delivery were different. This had caused the cliques—and Paul refused to go along with any of it. Such divisions had to be stopped.


Paul wondered whether the Corinthians’ quarrels had “divided” Christ. This is a graphic picture of what happens when the church (the body of Christ) is divided. With so many churches and styles of worship available today, believers can get caught up in the same game of “my preacher is better than yours!” They follow personalities and even change churches based on who is popular. To act this way is to divide Christ again. But Christ is not divided, and his true followers should not allow anything to divide the church. Don’t let your appreciation for any teacher, preacher, speaker, or writer lead you into intellectual pride. Believers’ allegiance must be to Christ and to the unity that he desires.
 
Posted by fastforward (Member # 7073) on :
 
OK, because you are a nice person I will stop and I will try never to act ugly here at this site again out of respect to my fellows.

fastforward
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CHEWY:
David-

I will bite. Yes I am one of God's elect.

Chewy-

Well it is not a trick question. Thought we were going to discuss Calvinism and since they believe God has alread chosen the elect and the person has nothing to do with it.

I would like to know how do you know you are one of the chosen ones?

Just wondering how Calvinist know they are special and better then the people made to go to hell with out a chance.

Thanks,
David
 
Posted by Bloodbought (Member # 4365) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David Campbell:

I would like to know how do you know you are one of the chosen ones?

Just wondering how Calvinist know they are special and better then the people made to go to hell with out a chance.

Thanks,
David

Hi David,

I will give you a Bible reference that those of us who believe in election sometimes quote.

1 John 5:11 And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
12 He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

If you have the Son you are chosen and elected Calvinist whither you are aware of it or not. [Smile]

God bless.
 
Posted by Carol Swenson (Member # 6929) on :
 
This whole thing is confusing me to no end. I came across this today:


Concise Theology: A Guide To Historic Christian Beliefs

What we do know is, first, that had we not been chosen for life we would not be believers now ( for only the elect are brought to faith ), and, second, that as elect believers we may rely on God to finish in us the good work that he started (1 Cor. 1:8-9; Phil. 1:6; 1 Thess. 5:23-24; 2 Tim. 1:12; 4:18). Knowledge of one’s election thus brings comfort and joy.

Peter tells us we should be “eager to make [our] calling and election sure” (2 Pet. 1:10)—that is, certain to us. Election is known by its fruits . Paul knew the election of the Thessalonians from their faith, hope, and love, the inward and outward transformation of their lives that the gospel had brought about (1 Thess. 1:3-6). The more that the qualities to which Peter has been exhorting his readers appear in our lives (goodness, knowledge, self-control, perseverance, godliness, brotherly kindness, love: 2 Pet. 1:5-7), the surer of our own election we are entitled to be.

I do not believe in the appalling idea that God created a world full of people who are condemned to an eternity in hell with no choice and no chance to belong to Christ.

But aside from that horrible thought, where is the difference between an elect and a believer? We say that God has chosen the elect, but a believer chooses God. Yet we know that a sinner will not choose God unless the Holy Spirit prompts him in some way.
 
Posted by Bloodbought (Member # 4365) on :
 
Luke 13:23 Then said one unto him, Lord, are there few that be saved? And he said unto them,
24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.

Meaning of the word strive
75 avgwni,zomai agonizomai {ag-o-nid'-zom-ahee}
Meaning: 1) to enter a contest: contend in the gymnastic games 2) to contend with adversaries, fight 3) metaph. to contend, struggle, with difficulties and dangers 4) to endeavour with strenuous zeal, strive: to obtain something
Origin: from 73; TDNT - 1:135,20; v
Usage: AV - strive 3, fight 3, labour fervently 1; 7

This man shouldn’t have been concerned about how many would be saved and what will the many do who are not able to enter.

He should have been striving with the question, what must I do to be saved?

He could have received the following answer.

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. Acts 16:31
 
Posted by Carol Swenson (Member # 6929) on :
 
quote:
He should have been striving with the question, what must I do to be saved?

He could have received the following answer.

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. Acts 16:31

I agree! But there are some who say that people have no choice. The choice was made in eternity past. Their definition of the elect, and our definition of believers, seem so similar to me that I fail to understand the difference.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
This may sound a little off of the subject, but, you cannot prove God. It will be really off of the subject to say that you cannot disprove God. However concerning the subject of proving God, this simple scriptural fact states God's feelings on the saving of men's souls:

"For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe."(1Co 1:21)

It is equal opportunity salvation unless He chose who would believe way back when. And because He is who He is, HE can do that. Did He? Understanding election is beyond us. He can surely show us that what we think, is not how it really is, if we think that we are so sure. I think that it is 'haughty' to assume, or presume election, which makes a statement in itself. That would not be a fruit of the Spirit. Amen!

Perhaps election is true? Perhaps however, we do not understand what we think we understand when we read what we read.
 
Posted by Carol Swenson (Member # 6929) on :
 
quote:
Perhaps election is true? Perhaps however, we do not understand what we think we understand when we read what we read.
Is this one of those statements that proves itself?

Anyway, if God chose the elect in eternity past, or if He only knows who will choose Him and the Holy Spirit prompts that individual, the line between these two is so fine that I don't get what the fuss is all about.
 
Posted by CHEWY (Member # 6970) on :
 
David-

I know ontologically. I know because of the changes He has made in my life. I know because I find myself doing those things that I don't want to do, yet I am driven by an unseen guiding hand to make the correct decisions. I know because God has opened my eyes and my ears to understand that He is sovereign. I know because only God could have taken the rebellious heart that I had and conditioned it to a point of which it was suitable for His use. I know because I realize that I would have never chosen Christ of my own accord. His wooing me, His chastising me, His seeking me in the ungodliest of places and letting me know that He was there even then have revealed to me that I am one of His elect.

Please, don't get me wrong. I clearly made a choice for Christ, I voluntarily professed Him as my Lord and Personal Savior. My questions revolve around the work that had to happen before I made that choice. This work that had to happen within my heart could not be performed by me. Without this work being completed, I could not have chosen Christ. I was in an evil place, a desolate land, an environment that had grips on every aspect of my life. To think that I just suddenly woke up one morning and decided to profess Christ is unimaginable for me. God chose me first. Then I voluntarily embraced Him.

Could I have rejected Him? Could I have refused His wooing? I to this day don't see that as even optional. The deliverances He performed in my life
before salvation tell me that He had my number and left the 99 behind to come get me and carry me home to where I belonged.

When does the regeneration of the heart happen? Before salvation, after?

Gathering information-
Plowing on-

Chewy-
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
Chewy,

The very same thing happen to me. But I believe the Holy Spirit draws all men at some point in their life. If they continue to say no then their heart becomes hard and they may never come.

I sure believe we are on the same team but we just don't agree on this subject.

I do however believe we need to point everyone to Jesus Christ and let Him be where we keep our gaze and not on certain teachers.

Jesus is the one that said:

And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.
John 12:32 (KJV)

So I shall keep telling people about the love of God. And lifting up the name of Jesus Christ.

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. - John 3:16 (KJV)

For once I was lost and now I am found, was blind but now I see. It is so good to know that God can save even some one as bad as me. I am sure if someone told me that Jesus only died for the elect before I came to know Him, that I would have though I sure was not one of the elect because I was surely on the highway to hell. It sure did not look like I was one and I would have though I had NO HOPE.

But think God no one told me that. They told me Jesus came so sinners would come to know Him.

Thank you so much for taking the time to answer my question. You are the first Calvinist that would say they where one of the elect. So I see you do know Jesus. That is the main thing to me. I know for sure no one is saved that does not know Jesus Christ.

God bless!

Plow on, plow on...
David C

.
 
Posted by Bloodbought (Member # 4365) on :
 
I think there is some misunderstanding among non-Calvinists concerning Calvinistic doctrine.

Calvinism does not teach that those who are saved can point the finger at those who are not saved and say they are not elect.

A Calvinist evangelist was once asked. “Why preach to those who are not elect, why don’t you preach to the elect only?” The evangelist replied. “You put a label on the elect and I will preach to them only.” No one knows who the elect are among the unsaved, so the evangelist must preach to all men equally. Only the elect will respond by the prompting of the Holy Spirit. The non-elect will not understand.
 
Posted by David Campbell (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bloodbought:
I think there is some misunderstanding among non-Calvinists concerning Calvinistic doctrine.

Calvinism does not teach that those who are saved can point the finger at those who are not saved and say they are not elect.

A Calvinist evangelist was once asked. “Why preach to those who are not elect, why don’t you preach to the elect only?” The evangelist replied. “You put a label on the elect and I will preach to them only.” No one knows who the elect are among the unsaved, so the evangelist must preach to all men equally. Only the elect will respond by the prompting of the Holy Spirit. The non-elect will not understand.

Good point. The ones that respond make the choice to do so via the Holy Spirit who calls all men when Jesus is lifted up.

.
 
Posted by WildB (Member # 2917) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fastforward:
WildB,
Thanks.
If you cared to look at my little profile here at this site you will see trucking listed. In the good old U.S. of A. we ship more goods by truck than any other country in the world. And on the backs of all those truck trailers are placed these seals. Only authorized personnel can legally break the seals and only when they reach their destination, (excepting upon some sort of catastrophe and even then it is still only authorized personnel just a different set).

It was good talking to you WildB,
Fastforward

I did. And hopefully we can put this dog to rest.


I too understand SEALING. ALL safty valves on a Boiler are SEALED.

The valve is set to a limit that lets the valve lift to mantain a safe operating pressure.

When lifted it goes back to the limit operation without having to be ~RE-SEALED.


Those that teach OSAS , ONCE SEALED AIN'T SEALED, are those that would by~pass the valve and jepordized the overal integaty of the boiler.


Boilers with misfunctioning, improperly set or TAMPERED with safty valves KILL.

Thats why the SEAL is important.

Lets Let the Holy Spirit SEAL and not man's sillyness.

I thank God Thru Jesus my Lord that I am SEALED untill the day of REDEMPTION.
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
WildB all I can say is if you are Truly Sealed you will live like you are seal, just like the Boiler that has been sealed remains seal and does it intended purpose!
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
To those of Calvinist teaching that say only the elect will be saved, your teaching makes Yahweh a being worst than Hitler.

Bring your thought of Election to its conclusion!

Why bother to obey Yahweh's command to raise up a child in the way he should go. if he or she is Elected they will be saved anyway !

Your doctrine make Yahweh and Yeshua respecters of persons, "which the scripture plainly say Yahweh is not.

Yeshua died for whosoever will!

Not just the Elect.
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
bump...I was really wondering about your answer to my statement...

WildB all I can say is if you are Truly Sealed you will live like you are seal, just like the Boiler that has been sealed remains sealed and does it intended purpose!

Am I off in my reasoning?
 
Posted by CHEWY (Member # 6970) on :
 
David-
In further response to the post on March 23...

No matter whether you are Calvinist, Armenian or somewhere in between, all agree back to God's foreknowledge. He foreknew who would be saved and who wouldn't be saved even before the creation of the universe. This being said, If God foreknew that many wouldn't be saved and he created them anyway, aren't they without hope of salvation? [I guess I have a hard time understanding how God's foreknowledge could be wrong.]

Also I see those, that are of the elect, as some who were selected for no reason of our own. I view myself and everyone else as deserving of death and hell. God in His justice has every right to send us all to hell and save none due to our sin. Because He has chosen to make a way for some of these sinful people to be redeemed is an act of His mercy, not that there was anything special about me or any other member of the elect.

One of the problems with the Calvinistic teaching stems from the idea that since I am one of God's elect, I can become prideful in this. God's mercy should in no way shape or form make us prideful, except in the Lord Jesus. It should make us grateful.

I know that you would rather see this thread fade away. Sorry for reopening it.

Still gathering information and trying to be able to explain what I believe and the reason for the hope that is within me- Thank You Jesus!!!!


Chewy-
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
Is correct theology, offering hope to the hopeless or taking away hope?

True story…

A preacher who once believed and preached …
“Once Saved Always Saved’’ “Predestination, Heaven or Hell”…

One day his little girl came to him and said “dad I’ve been listening to you preach ever since I was old enough to listen and understand and I know I am predestined for hell there is no use me trying to do any different, I am going to enjoy as much of life as I can before I go to hell.

The dad / pastor / begged and pleaded with his little girl only sixteen years of age, but to no avail. Her mind was made up she was going to hell, she was convinced from her dad’s preaching she was predestined for hell so why try…

and with that left home.

The girl started living a very rebellious life alcohol, drugs, and sex …. The next information the dad got about his daughter was she was dead from an accident.

I would hate to be this father for more than one reason….

Could this story be different if the dad had a different theology?
 
Posted by KnowHim (Member # 1) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CHEWY:
David-

I know that you would rather see this thread fade away. Sorry for reopening it.

Chewy-

No I don’t want this thread to fade away as I am very interested in what people believe and why.

It is very interesting to me that seemingly good Godly people that have Godly fruit bearing lives and are really out to tell people about the Good News of salvation through Jesus Christ, see what the bible says and means in such a different light.

It is very puzzling to me.

First of all I want to state that I believe in God’s Supreme Sovereignty. God is God and can do what ever He wants and He does just that. This is to include giving men freewill on certain decisions if He chooses to do so. If He wants, yes he can create people to be like robots. If He wants, He can if He so chooses to do so, create people to go to hell. But that don’t mean I believe He does.

When reading the T.U.L.I.P.

Total Depravity (also known as Total Inability and Original Sin)
Unconditional Election
Limited Atonement (also known as Particular Atonement)
Irresistible Grace
Perseverance of the Saints (also known as Once Saved Always Saved)

I do agree with 3 of these, not necessarily the way Calvin sees it but the way I understand it when asking the Holy Spirit to show me what He wants me to know.

Total Depravity (also known as Total Inability and Original Sin)
Limited Atonement (also known as Particular Atonement
Perseverance of the Saints (also known as Once Saved Always Saved)

The Holy Spirit is the one that has taught me as I would have never came know Jesus Christ by listening to men as they seem to have ulterior motives. I have learned that the Holy Spirit never tries to play games but is gently leading us toward knowing Jesus Christ the Son of God. And in seeking to know more about why this topic seems to split very Godly men and women apart. I want to know what people think and why we can not get on the same page. Because I know I love and follow Jesus Christ and I am certain that people on both sides of this issue love and follow the Lord. So if anyone else is interested and some what puzzled about this, lets discuss it in a friendly way. 


The below I agree with to a certain point, but not the way Calvin teaches it:
Unconditional Election
Irresistible Grace


I really like to read Charles Spurgeon’s writing. When I was told he was a Calvinist I started looking into it. I do agree with his below statement.


Many like to claim Spurgeon as a staunch Calvinist, all the way through, but listen to what he said concerning free-will, and I quote: “I do not think I differ from any of my Hyper-Calvinistic brethren in what I do believe, but I differ from them in what they do not believe. I do not hold any less than they do, but I hold a little more, and I think, a little more of the truth revealed in the Scriptures. Not only are there a few cardinal doctrines, by which we can steer our ship North, South, East, or West, but as we study the Word, we shall begin to learn something about the North-west and North-east, and all else that lies between the four cardinal points. The system of truth revealed in the Scriptures is not simply one straight line, but two; and no man will ever get a right view of the gospel until he knows how to look at the two lines at once. For instance, I read in one Book of the Bible, “The Spirit and the Bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take of the water of life freely.” Yet I am taught, in another part of the same inspired Word, that “it is not of him that willeth, or of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.” I see, in one place, God in providence presiding over all, and yet I see, and I cannot help seeing, that man acts as he pleases, and that God has left his actions, in a great measure, to his own free-will. Now, if I were to declare that man was so free to act that there was no control of God over his actions, I should be driven very near to atheism; and if, on the other hand, I should declare that God so over-rules all things that man is not free enough to be responsible, I should be driven at once to Antinomianism or fatalism. That God predestines, and yet that man is responsible, are two facts that few can see clearly. They are believed to be inconsistent and contradictory to each other. If, then, I find in one part of the Bible that everything is foreordained, that is true; and I find, in another Scripture, that man is responsible for all his actions, that is true; and it is only my folly that leads me to imagine that these two truths can ever contradict each other. I do not believe they can ever be welded into one upon any earthly anvil, but they certainly shall be one in eternity. They are two lines that are so nearly parallel, that the human mind which pursues them farthest will never discover that they converge, but they do converge, and they will meet somewhere in eternity, close to the throne of God, whence all truth doth spring.”

http://www.spurgeon.org/calvinis.htm

First I would like to know if you agree with Charles Spurgeon’s above statement?

Also this has become such an intriguing subject to me that I would like to open up several topics and look into them together. (Just discussing it not arguing)

One on Irresistible Grace and another on Unconditional Election.

I will open them today. Everyone please join us and lets talk about this subject in a kind and Christ like way.


.
 
Posted by CHEWY (Member # 6970) on :
 
David-

"First I would like to know if you agree with Charles Spurgeon’s above statement?"

I do agree with Spurgeon very much. As I have also posted recently on another topic, I believe that man has fallen into the trap of an either/or mentality. [Either the responsibility of man exists or the sovreignty of God exists] I choose both. The Scriptures plainly teach both and therefore I don't have to "choose" one or the other, I am to accept both.

For example: I have seen my wife stand at the closet and "choose" what she will wear. After donning several different garments, maybe even a dozen different ones, she will conclude with let's say the blue oufit. Yet from the omniscience of God, she had no choice but to wear the one God knew she would end up wearing.

This is something that nearly sent Martin Luther to the "madhouse." Yet he too came to the conclusion that this is something we have to accept and forget trying to understand.

I don't adhere to the teaching of Armenianism but I strongly disagree with the Calvinism that says there is no need to evangelize, pray, etc. as it is all foreordained. This is a dangerous teaching.

Have you ever considered that evangelism has two sides? On one side we have the person spreading the Gospel to an unbelieving world and someone receives the Gospel and is saved. On the other hand, we have the Gospel being presented with no response and the unbeliever continues to live in an unsaved state. Praise God for those occassions where the lost one is found. Yet there is a purpose for the evangelism of those who do not receive. Those who reject the Gospel one day will stand at the Great White Throne Judgment and there life will be judged. When the image of those who reject the Gospel is recalled to their memory they will find themselves in a situation where that "Every knee shall bow." Sadly, it will be too late.

Thanks David for hosting this site, where that we can share our thoughts and beliefs.

Chewy-
 
Posted by TB125 (Member # 2450) on :
 
The relationship between Calvinism and Arminianism in respect to the teachings of various individuals in the Bible (including Moses, Jesus, and Paul) is certainly challenging and somewhat confusing. We can get caught into repeating numerous historic discussions and citing various scriptural texts to "prove" our selected conclusions regarding this matter. I don't choose to do this.

It might help to recognize and to clearly affirm the basic truth of scriptural teaching that God's sovereign authority and power makes him the ultimate agent for salvation, which includes the redemption of all of his creation. This means that God's will governs the process of salvation for everyone and that no one, particularly any sinning rebels, have any right or authority to claim any exemption to his will or pride in their claim to his willful blessings.

Various texts of Scripture give us some clues as to what God considers to be basically important in his work of salvation, but it is the commission and the calling of God's children to reflect his glory, to witness to his grace and love in Jesus Christ, and to be faithful in their stewardship of all the resources and gifts that he has given to them, including his gift of faith and the forgiveness of their sins. All of us, all humanity, is going to stand before God and his authorized judge, Jesus, and there will be no human explanation for any of us to justify ourselves before them!

We would do well to stop this discussion and debate and proclaim and teach and interpret the "good news" of Jesus, who died and rose from the dead to make salvation possible. This is the commission that God and Jesus has given to his disciples, including those of us whom he has called to be his "children", his "apostles" (sent ones) in the world. I would like to see more "good news" in this forum, and less debates that probably only confuse and distract and probably offend many non-believing viewers.

Rather than dealing with questions regarding "election" and "free will", let us give more attention to what Jesus and the Holy Spirit and God is doing day by day in our lives; what is Jesus doing in your life today? That is a far more important question to be discussing than any that have to with "election" and "free will". Amen.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
Even Paul considered himself not to have attained. Attained what? Resurrection from the dead. This means simply that it wasn't over until it was over, and he was in heaven, knowing that he was on the right side of judgment. Even the doctrine of election, strong as it is, is not strong enough to nullify this attitude of Paul's. Else he could have taken it for granted and said that he was elected, and he was in good with his maker, and didn't have to attain to, or apprehend that for which he was apprehended, which was final closure concerning eternal life.
 
Posted by WildB (Member # 2917) on :
 
Phil.3

[1] Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.
[2] Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.
[3] For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

[4] Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:
[5] Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
[6] Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.
[7] But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.
[8] Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,
[9] And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:

[10] That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;
[11] If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
[12] Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus.

[13] Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
[14] I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.

[15] Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you.
[16] Nevertheless, whereto we have already attained, let us walk by the same rule, let us mind the same thing.

[17] Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for an ensample.
[18] (For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ:
[19] Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.)
[20] For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ:
[21] Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.

 
Posted by Eden (Member # 5728) on :
 
Salvation is by God's sovereing election to the extent that God and Jesus chose the method of Jesus dying on the cross for our sins and raising from the dead on the third day" as the method whereby people would be saved.

God and Jesus must have clearly understood that by choosing the above method whereby people could be saved, would automatically exclude a large segment of humanity, just as the method chosen would automatically include a minority segment of humanity.

The very method chosen by them limited who on earth would be able to choose that, and in that manner it appears to have become "election":

Exodus 33:19
And He said {to Moses}, I will make all My goodness pass before you, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before you; and I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy.

Romans 9:15
For He said to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

Romans 9:18
17 For the scripture said to Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised you up, that I might show My power in you, and that My name might be declared throughout all the earth.

18 Therefore has He mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He will He hardens.

19 You will say then to me, Why does He yet find fault? For who has resisted His will?

But it was the method that God and Jesus decided on and chose, whereby men could be saved, that predetermined who would be able to accept the method.

God and Jesus knew exactly who in history would be able to accept such a proposition or method, and who would not be able.

Therefore the method chosen itself made salvation "only by election of God and Jesus". But when we humans who in every generation are able to accept the method, it looks to us that we are "accepting" the method, but it is our prior generational make-up that decided that we "could" accept the method in the first place.

It "looks" like choosing to us, but it really isn't.

with love, eden
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
[7] But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.
[8] Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,
[9] And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:

[Cross] Have ye 'this' faith?

[10] That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;
[11] If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
[12] Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus.

[Cross] I follow after that I may lay hold of what is also His desire to lay hold of me for, in mutual interest.

[13] Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
[14] I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.
 
Posted by Michael Harrison (Member # 6801) on :
 
Israel was a chosen nation of people. Others who were outside of Israel appear chosen for wrath. Yet, some outside of Israel feared the God of Israel, and benefited with her. Rahab the Harlot comes to mind. There were others. All men are able to fear God. But the devil puts men under a whammy! The pressure brought to bear by the evil one by peer pressure, conformity and whatever, imprisons men. It is why we should pray, and be witnesses.
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
(Acts 8:13 NIV) Simon himself believed and was baptized. And he followed Philip everywhere, astonished by the great signs and miracles he saw.

He believed. I would say he was a believer, but look at what happens a little later:

(Acts 8:18-24 NIV) [18] When Simon saw that the Spirit was given at the laying on of the apostles' hands, he offered them money [19] and said, "Give me also this ability so that everyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit."

[20] Peter answered: "May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money! [21] You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. [22] Repent of this wickedness and pray to the Lord. Perhaps he will forgive you for having such a thought in your heart. [23] For I see that you are full of bitterness and captive to sin."

[24] Then Simon answered, "Pray to the Lord for me so that nothing you have said may happen to me."

Look what Peter says: 'repent of this wickedness .... perhaps he (the Lord) will forgive you.'

Once Saved Always Saved teaches that all our sins 'past, present and future' are forgiven at the moment of salvation.

If so then this passage is meaningless. Simon seems to have taken what Peter said pretty seriously.

You can try to say that Simon was never a true believer, but if that is true, then why did the Holy Spirit have Luke include the verse about him believing and being baptized? No, I think we can be sure that he was a true believer, but that he was pulled away by his own evil desires and greed.

Why do we teach people that once they have placed faith in Yahshua nothing else matters? That their sins are already forgiven and nothing they do, or believe or fail to believe from that point on matters? We are risking sending people to hell for eternity because we don't bother to read the Bible and accept what it says at face value.
 
Posted by CHEWY (Member # 6970) on :
 
And isn't it interesting that Peter said, "Perhaps" the Lord will forgive you?

Chewy-
 
Posted by becauseHElives (Member # 87) on :
 
quote:
Chewy said....

And isn't it interesting that Peter said, "Perhaps" the Lord will forgive you?

Can we grasp the importance of this statement...

think about it, this is Peter who was singled out by name by Yahshua after the resurrection...

if anyone understood forgiveness it was Peter...

but here Peter, under the direction of the Holy Spirit says to Simon Perhaps" the Lord will forgive you?

that passage should make us all very sober in our thinking....
 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0