|
Author
|
Topic: Here WE GO~It begins
|
WildB
Moderator
Member # 2917
|
posted
Hey chaoschristian.
Lets let some more laws to legalize this. "Do any of these rulings actually outlaw Christianity?" No you can still be "YOUR" type of christian.
This wannabe pedo tried to solicit jenjen_1991, a 13 year old girl
... or so they thought!
transcripts here http://www.perverted-justice.com/?archive=Markiemarcc
WAKE UP AMERICA
--------------------
That is all.....
Posts: 8775 | From: USA, MICHIGAN | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged | 
|
|
WildB
Moderator
Member # 2917
|
posted
chaoschristian
Advanced Member
Member # 5273
Icon 1 posted December 15, 2005 01:30 PM Profile for chaoschristian Author's Homepage Send New Private Message Edit/Delete Post Reply With Quote Do any of these rulings actually outlaw Christianity?
No, they do not.
Do any of these rulings restrict the PERSONAL spiritual life of any practicing Christian?
No, they do not.
Do any of these rulings prevent or restrict the private or public gathering of Christians?
No they do not.
Get the point?
These rulings are not against Christianity.
They are against the values of certain Christians who desire and would have Christianity legislated.
As far as I am concerned, Christianity that is legislated is Christianity defiled.
The power and holiness of Christ is derived from God, not from the state house. Jesus taught us to avoid earthly power, not to embrace it.
Yea I get the point. One can now be a chaoschristian.
A walk on the wide road without the Road Map of Life to keep true north.
Matt.7
1. [14] Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
Heb.10
1. [7] Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.
The BOOK is the Road Map of ETERNAL LIFE.
REPENT WHILE THE DAY IS YET CALLED DAY.
Rev.2
1. [25] But that which ye have already hold fast till I come.
Rev.3
1. [11] Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.
Rev.16
1. [15] Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
Rev.22
1. [7] Behold, I come quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book.
2. [12] And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
3. [20] He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
In Jesus Name,
Amen
A Patriot in Christ
--------------------
That is all.....
Posts: 8775 | From: USA, MICHIGAN | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
|
|
WildB
Moderator
Member # 2917
|
posted
Only in Utah, pretty convoluted.
-----------------------------------------------
Mom, 13, is ruled a sex crime offender
Appeals court: But she is also a victim; a boy, then 12, fathered her baby, and he is also a victim and perpetrator
By Pamela Manson
The Salt Lake Tribune
An appeals court on Friday upheld a judge's refusal to dismiss a sexual abuse allegation against a 13-year-old Ogden girl who became pregnant by her 12-year-old boyfriend.
The Utah Court of Appeals says the law's "rigorous protections" for younger minors include protecting them from each other.
The decision leaves the teens in the odd position of each being both a victim and a perpetrator in the same offense.
"The Legislature certainly may act to protect the health and safety of children, and may more vigorously protect those of more tender years," Judge Gregory Orme wrote for a three-member panel of the court, which made its decision "with some reluctance."
The girl's Ogden attorneys, Randall Richards and Dee Smith, are considering an appeal to the Utah Supreme Court.
Richards pointed out that Utah law says minors under age 14 do not have the ability to consent to sexual activity.
"It's a paradox," he said. "How can they be old enough to commit an offense if they're not old enough to consent to it?"
According to the court decision, the girl became pregnant after she and the boy engaged in sex in October 2003.
State authorities filed delinquency petitions in July 2004, alleging that each had committed sexual abuse of a child, a second-degree felony if committed by an adult.
The girl appealed the petition, saying her constitutional right to be treated equally under the law had been violated.
Her motion noted that for juveniles who are 16 and 17, having sex with others in their own age group does not qualify as a crime.
Juveniles who are 14 or 15 and have sex with peers can be charged with unlawful conduct with a minor but the law provides for mitigation when the age difference is less than four years, making the offense a misdemeanor.
For adolescents under 14, though, there
Advertisement
are no exceptions or mitigation and they are never considered capable of consenting to sex.
A juvenile court judge, although sympathetic to the situation, denied the motion. The girl then admitted to the offense while preserving her right to appeal to a higher court. The boy did not appeal.
The judge ordered the young mother to write a report about the effect of her actions on herself and her baby, to obey the reasonable requests of her parents, to remain under the supervision of the state Division of Child and Family Services, to refrain from unsupervised contact with the baby's father and to provide a DNA sample.
Despite the light sanctions, the conviction could have lingering effects, according to Richards.
If the girl commits a crime when she is an adult, her juvenile record will make it more likely that she will go to prison and could increase the length of her sentence, he said. And there is the emotional toll of knowing she has a sexual abuse conviction.
But the Court of Appeals said lawmakers can constitutionally give greater protection to younger juveniles.
"The Legislature is well within its rights to come down solidly against sexual activity with children of such tender years - anywhere, anytime, any place, and by anyone. . . . And we cannot say such strict treatment does not also rationally further those purposes by strongly discouraging any sexual conduct involving children."
Just put it on the list RIGHT chaoschristian cause these rulings don't actually outlaw Christianity
LANDMARK DECISIONS AGAINT US
Engel v. Vitale
June 17, 1962
The Supreme Court restricts prayer in schools.
Roe v. Wade
January 22, 1973
The Supreme Court finds that the right to personal privacy includes abortion.
Stone v. Graham
November 17th, 1980
The Supreme Court strikes down a Kentucky statute requiring display of the Ten Commandments in public schools.
Madsen v. Women's Health Center
June 30, 1994
The Supreme Court upholds the creation of so-called "buffer zones" around abortion clinics, severly restricting pro-life free speech.
Newdow v. U.S.
June 26, 2002
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rules that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.
Lawrence v. Texas
June 26, 2003
The Supreme Court strikes down a Texas law prohibiting sodomy.
Glassroth v. Moore
July 1, 2003
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal rules that a monument to the Ten Commandments placed in Alabama's judiciary building must be removed.
Nov 6, 2003
Federal judges in New York and California issue temporary restraining orders blocking enforcement of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.
Goodridge v. Dept of Public Health
Nov 18, 2003
The Massachusetts Supreme Court rules that same-sex couples can marry under the laws of that state.
Feb 4, 2004
The Massachusetts Supreme Court declares that the state legislature may not offer "civil union" as an alternative to same-sex marriage, amplifying the court's November 18, 2003 decision. The ruling paves the way for the first state-recognized, homosexual marriages in U.S. history.
March 13, 2008
The Supreme Court Rules Knowlegeable Sex by consent with minnors is OK by case discretion per case inference.
Randall Richards and Dee Smith~Vs~US
..................................
Lev.18
[25] And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.
--------------------
--------------------
That is all.....
http://thechristianbbs.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=002339
--------------------
That is all.....
Posts: 8775 | From: USA, MICHIGAN | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
